Women's Rights

All Cases

133 Women's Rights Cases

A picture of Jessica and her children
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2016

Women's Rights

Castle Rock v. Gonzales

Reviewing whether a woman whose three children were killed after being abducted by her estranged husband can raise a procedural due process claim based on the Town of Castle Rock's failure to enforce a protective order despite Colorado's mandatory arrest law. DECIDED
Explore case
Castle Rock V. Gonzales. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2016
A picture of Jessica and her children

Women's Rights

Castle Rock v. Gonzales

Reviewing whether a woman whose three children were killed after being abducted by her estranged husband can raise a procedural due process claim based on the Town of Castle Rock's failure to enforce a protective order despite Colorado's mandatory arrest law. DECIDED
Castle Rock V. Gonzales. Explore Case.
Manning v. Hagel, et al.
Court Case
Jan 2016

Women's Rights

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Manning v. Hagel, et al.

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof the Nation's Capital, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Kansas and civilian defense counsel David E. Coombs have filed a lawsuit on behalf of Chelsea Manning in federal court in the District of Columbia against Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and other Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of the Army officials for their failure to provide necessary medical treatment for her gender dysphoria, a condition with which she was originally diagnosed by Army doctors more than four years ago.
Explore case
Manning V. Hagel, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jan 2016
Manning v. Hagel, et al.

Women's Rights

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Manning v. Hagel, et al.

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof the Nation's Capital, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Kansas and civilian defense counsel David E. Coombs have filed a lawsuit on behalf of Chelsea Manning in federal court in the District of Columbia against Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and other Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of the Army officials for their failure to provide necessary medical treatment for her gender dysphoria, a condition with which she was originally diagnosed by Army doctors more than four years ago.
Manning V. Hagel, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2015

Women's Rights

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association

Whether public employee unions can be authorized by state law to collect a fee from non-members for the cost of negotiating and implementing a collective bargaining agreement that benefits all employees.
Explore case
Friedrichs V. California Teachers Association. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2015
Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association

Women's Rights

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association

Whether public employee unions can be authorized by state law to collect a fee from non-members for the cost of negotiating and implementing a collective bargaining agreement that benefits all employees.
Friedrichs V. California Teachers Association. Explore Case.
Myers v. Hope Healthcare Center LLC
Michigan
Aug 2015

Women's Rights

Myers v. Hope Healthcare Center LLC

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Michigan, and Cary McGehee of the law firm Pitt McGehee Palmer Rivers & Golden have filed an amended lawsuit in federal court today on behalf of a woman who was forced out of work after she became pregnant.
Explore case
Myers V. Hope Healthcare Center Llc. Explore Case.
Michigan
Aug 2015
Myers v. Hope Healthcare Center LLC

Women's Rights

Myers v. Hope Healthcare Center LLC

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Michigan, and Cary McGehee of the law firm Pitt McGehee Palmer Rivers & Golden have filed an amended lawsuit in federal court today on behalf of a woman who was forced out of work after she became pregnant.
Myers V. Hope Healthcare Center Llc. Explore Case.
Michigan
Jun 2015

Women's Rights

Reproductive Freedom

Tamesha Means v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Michigan have filed a lawsuit on behalf of a pregnant woman who miscarried and was denied appropriate medical treatment because the only hospital in her county is required to abide by religious directives. The directives, written by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, prohibited that hospital from complying with the applicable standard of care in this case.
Explore case
Tamesha Means V. United States Conference Of Catholic Bishops. Explore Case.
Michigan
Jun 2015

Women's Rights

Reproductive Freedom

Tamesha Means v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Michigan have filed a lawsuit on behalf of a pregnant woman who miscarried and was denied appropriate medical treatment because the only hospital in her county is required to abide by religious directives. The directives, written by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, prohibited that hospital from complying with the applicable standard of care in this case.
Tamesha Means V. United States Conference Of Catholic Bishops. Explore Case.
1011
12
1314...