Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

All Cases

48 Fighting Cuts to Voting Access Cases

vote sign
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2026

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Watson v. Republican National Committee (Amicus)

In 2020, in a nearly unanimous bipartisan vote, Mississippi joined eighteen other states in accepting mail ballots postmarked by Election Day that arrived after Election Day (in Mississippi’s case, up to five business days). This lawsuit by partisan actors seeks to disenfranchise these voters whose ballot is mailed by Election Day but—through no fault of their own—does not arrive until afterwards. In Mississippi, this harm will fall disproportionately on voters with disabilities, older voters, and other communities that rely upon absentee voting. Twisting the words and meaning of Congress, the RNC argues that three longstanding federal laws that set a uniform election day for federal races require that ballot may only be counted if they are received by election officials by Election Day. If accepted, this radical argument would not only disenfranchise thousands upon thousands of voters in Mississippi and eighteen other states, but also upend election administration in every state.
Explore case
Watson V. Republican National Committee (amicus). Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2026
vote sign

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Watson v. Republican National Committee (Amicus)

In 2020, in a nearly unanimous bipartisan vote, Mississippi joined eighteen other states in accepting mail ballots postmarked by Election Day that arrived after Election Day (in Mississippi’s case, up to five business days). This lawsuit by partisan actors seeks to disenfranchise these voters whose ballot is mailed by Election Day but—through no fault of their own—does not arrive until afterwards. In Mississippi, this harm will fall disproportionately on voters with disabilities, older voters, and other communities that rely upon absentee voting. Twisting the words and meaning of Congress, the RNC argues that three longstanding federal laws that set a uniform election day for federal races require that ballot may only be counted if they are received by election officials by Election Day. If accepted, this radical argument would not only disenfranchise thousands upon thousands of voters in Mississippi and eighteen other states, but also upend election administration in every state.
Watson V. Republican National Committee (amicus). Explore Case.
massachusetts voting
Illinois
Jan 2026

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Matthews

The Department of Justice sued the Illinois Board of Elections, demanding the state produce its full, unredacted voter file, which contains highly sensitive and personal data on every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of the federal government's efforts to build a national voter database without congressional authorization and to improperly question the validity of state voter rolls.
Explore case
United States V. Matthews. Explore Case.
Illinois
Jan 2026
massachusetts voting

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Matthews

The Department of Justice sued the Illinois Board of Elections, demanding the state produce its full, unredacted voter file, which contains highly sensitive and personal data on every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of the federal government's efforts to build a national voter database without congressional authorization and to improperly question the validity of state voter rolls.
United States V. Matthews. Explore Case.
A woman with her face hidden stands in front of a voting table.
Minnesota
Jan 2026

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Simon

Representing the League of Women Voters Minnesota, Common Cause, and two Minnesota voters with past felony convictions, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµVoting Rights Project and ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Minnesota have filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit over the federal government’s demand that Minnesota turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including with voters’ sensitive personal data such as drivers’ license numbers and partial social security numbers.
Explore case
United States V. Simon. Explore Case.
Minnesota
Jan 2026
A woman with her face hidden stands in front of a voting table.

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Simon

Representing the League of Women Voters Minnesota, Common Cause, and two Minnesota voters with past felony convictions, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµVoting Rights Project and ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Minnesota have filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit over the federal government’s demand that Minnesota turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including with voters’ sensitive personal data such as drivers’ license numbers and partial social security numbers.
United States V. Simon. Explore Case.
A close up of an "I Voted" sticker.
Colorado
Dec 2025

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Griswold

Representing Common Cause and two Colorado voters, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµVoting Rights Project and ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Colorado have filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit over the federal government’s demand that Colorado turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including voters’ sensitive personal data such as drivers’ license numbers and partial social security numbers.
Explore case
United States V. Griswold. Explore Case.
Colorado
Dec 2025
A close up of an "I Voted" sticker.

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Griswold

Representing Common Cause and two Colorado voters, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµVoting Rights Project and ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Colorado have filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit over the federal government’s demand that Colorado turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including voters’ sensitive personal data such as drivers’ license numbers and partial social security numbers.
United States V. Griswold. Explore Case.
NM
New Mexico
Dec 2025

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Oliver

The Department of Justice sued New Mexico Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver, demanding the state produce its full, unredacted voter file, which contains highly sensitive and personal data on every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of the federal government's efforts to build a national voter database without congressional authorization and to improperly question the validity of state voter rolls.
Explore case
United States V. Oliver. Explore Case.
New Mexico
Dec 2025
NM

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Oliver

The Department of Justice sued New Mexico Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver, demanding the state produce its full, unredacted voter file, which contains highly sensitive and personal data on every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of the federal government's efforts to build a national voter database without congressional authorization and to improperly question the validity of state voter rolls.
United States V. Oliver. Explore Case.
12
3
45...