Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

All Cases

48 Fighting Cuts to Voting Access Cases

voting
Georgia
Jan 2026

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Raffensperger

The Department of Justice sued Georgia, demanding the state produce its full, unredacted voter file, which contains highly sensitive and personal data on every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of the DOJ's efforts to build a national voter database without congressional authorization, improperly question the validity of state voter rolls, and intimidate eligible voters in Georgia and across the country.
Explore case
United States V. Raffensperger. Explore Case.
Georgia
Jan 2026
voting

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Raffensperger

The Department of Justice sued Georgia, demanding the state produce its full, unredacted voter file, which contains highly sensitive and personal data on every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of the DOJ's efforts to build a national voter database without congressional authorization, improperly question the validity of state voter rolls, and intimidate eligible voters in Georgia and across the country.
United States V. Raffensperger. Explore Case.
Colorado Voting
Connecticut
Jan 2026

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Thomas

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the State of Connecticut, seeking private, confidential voter data. DOJ鈥檚 efforts appear to be part of an effort to build a national voter database without congressional authorization and to improperly question the validity of state voter rolls.
Explore case
United States V. Thomas. Explore Case.
Connecticut
Jan 2026
Colorado Voting

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Thomas

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the State of Connecticut, seeking private, confidential voter data. DOJ鈥檚 efforts appear to be part of an effort to build a national voter database without congressional authorization and to improperly question the validity of state voter rolls.
United States V. Thomas. Explore Case.
With and American flag in the background, four people in the act of voting, stand behind voter booths as they make their selections.
California
Jan 2026

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Weber

Representing the League of Women Voters of California, the 桃子视频Voting Rights Project, 桃子视频of Northern California, and 桃子视频of Southern California have filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit over the federal government鈥檚 demand that California turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including with voters鈥 sensitive personal data such as drivers鈥 license numbers and partial social security numbers.
Explore case
United States V. Weber. Explore Case.
California
Jan 2026
With and American flag in the background, four people in the act of voting, stand behind voter booths as they make their selections.

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Weber

Representing the League of Women Voters of California, the 桃子视频Voting Rights Project, 桃子视频of Northern California, and 桃子视频of Southern California have filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit over the federal government鈥檚 demand that California turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including with voters鈥 sensitive personal data such as drivers鈥 license numbers and partial social security numbers.
United States V. Weber. Explore Case.
A person stands at a voting booth marked with an American flag and the word 鈥淰OTE鈥 inside a community polling place. The room has wooden floors, orange stacked chairs, and colorful landscape paintings on the walls, with a small U.S. flag displayed nearby.
Hawaii
Jan 2026

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Nago

The Department of Justice sued the Hawai鈥榠 Secretary of State, demanding the state produce its full, unredacted voter file, which contains highly sensitive and personal data on every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of the federal government's efforts to build a national voter database without congressional authorization and to improperly question the validity of state voter rolls.
Explore case
United States V. Nago. Explore Case.
Hawaii
Jan 2026
A person stands at a voting booth marked with an American flag and the word 鈥淰OTE鈥 inside a community polling place. The room has wooden floors, orange stacked chairs, and colorful landscape paintings on the walls, with a small U.S. flag displayed nearby.

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

United States v. Nago

The Department of Justice sued the Hawai鈥榠 Secretary of State, demanding the state produce its full, unredacted voter file, which contains highly sensitive and personal data on every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of the federal government's efforts to build a national voter database without congressional authorization and to improperly question the validity of state voter rolls.
United States V. Nago. Explore Case.
NM
Massachusetts
Jan 2026

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

California v. Trump (Amicus)

On March 25, 2025, in a sweeping and unprecedented Executive Order, President Trump attempted to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress and the States. Among other things, the Executive Order directs the Election Assistance Commission鈥攁n agency that Congress specifically established to be bipartisan and independent鈥攖o require voters to show a passport or other citizenship documentation in order to register to vote in federal elections. If implemented, the Executive Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible Americans to register and vote and upend the administration of federal elections.
Explore case
California V. Trump (amicus). Explore Case.
Massachusetts
Jan 2026
NM

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

California v. Trump (Amicus)

On March 25, 2025, in a sweeping and unprecedented Executive Order, President Trump attempted to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress and the States. Among other things, the Executive Order directs the Election Assistance Commission鈥攁n agency that Congress specifically established to be bipartisan and independent鈥攖o require voters to show a passport or other citizenship documentation in order to register to vote in federal elections. If implemented, the Executive Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible Americans to register and vote and upend the administration of federal elections.
California V. Trump (amicus). Explore Case.
1
2
34...