Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

All Cases

48 Fighting Cuts to Voting Access Cases

Credit: Right to Democracy
Alaska
Sep 2025

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Racial Justice

Smith v. State of Alaska (Amicus)

The 桃子视频and 桃子视频of Alaska have filed an amicus in support of Tupe Smith, a woman born in American Samoa who now lives in Whittier, Alaska charged with falsely affirming that she was a U.S. citizen when she registered to vote. But Tupe Smith is not an 鈥渁lien鈥 under the law. People, like her, born in the U.S. territory of American Samoa are the only remaining individuals recognized as 鈥渘on-citizen U.S. nationals,鈥 a unique status that falls short of 鈥渃itizen鈥 but nonetheless recognizes that American Samoa has been part of the United States for over 125 years.   All evidence indicates that Ms. Smith believed that, as a non-citizen U.S. national, she was eligible to vote in local elections when she registered to vote. In fact, local election officials encouraged her to check the box labeled U.S. citizen when she registered, given the fact that there was no option for U.S. national.   Our amicus brief urges Alaska鈥檚 Court of Appeals to dismiss Tupe Smith鈥檚 indictment because of well-settled principles that election-crime statutes should be construed to avoid punishing innocent mistakes. Separately, we warn that upholding a different view of the law would make Alaska an outlier among the states.
Explore case
Smith V. State Of Alaska (amicus). Explore Case.
Alaska
Sep 2025
Credit: Right to Democracy

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Racial Justice

Smith v. State of Alaska (Amicus)

The 桃子视频and 桃子视频of Alaska have filed an amicus in support of Tupe Smith, a woman born in American Samoa who now lives in Whittier, Alaska charged with falsely affirming that she was a U.S. citizen when she registered to vote. But Tupe Smith is not an 鈥渁lien鈥 under the law. People, like her, born in the U.S. territory of American Samoa are the only remaining individuals recognized as 鈥渘on-citizen U.S. nationals,鈥 a unique status that falls short of 鈥渃itizen鈥 but nonetheless recognizes that American Samoa has been part of the United States for over 125 years.   All evidence indicates that Ms. Smith believed that, as a non-citizen U.S. national, she was eligible to vote in local elections when she registered to vote. In fact, local election officials encouraged her to check the box labeled U.S. citizen when she registered, given the fact that there was no option for U.S. national.   Our amicus brief urges Alaska鈥檚 Court of Appeals to dismiss Tupe Smith鈥檚 indictment because of well-settled principles that election-crime statutes should be construed to avoid punishing innocent mistakes. Separately, we warn that upholding a different view of the law would make Alaska an outlier among the states.
Smith V. State Of Alaska (amicus). Explore Case.
With and American flag in the background, four people in the act of voting, stand behind voter booths as they make their selections.
Montana
Sep 2025

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Montana Federation of Public Employees v. Montana

Representing Western Native Voice and four sovereign tribal nations in Montana, the 桃子视频, 桃子视频of Montana, and Native American Rights Fund (NARF) challenged the latest in a line of Montana laws that hinder Native American participation in the state鈥檚 electoral process 鈥 SB 490, which drastically limits access to Election Day voter registration (EDR) in Montana. These laws violate a number of provisions in the Montana Constitution: the right to vote, equal protection, and due process.
Explore case
Montana Federation Of Public Employees V. Montana. Explore Case.
Montana
Sep 2025
With and American flag in the background, four people in the act of voting, stand behind voter booths as they make their selections.

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Montana Federation of Public Employees v. Montana

Representing Western Native Voice and four sovereign tribal nations in Montana, the 桃子视频, 桃子视频of Montana, and Native American Rights Fund (NARF) challenged the latest in a line of Montana laws that hinder Native American participation in the state鈥檚 electoral process 鈥 SB 490, which drastically limits access to Election Day voter registration (EDR) in Montana. These laws violate a number of provisions in the Montana Constitution: the right to vote, equal protection, and due process.
Montana Federation Of Public Employees V. Montana. Explore Case.
A volunteer prepares "I Voted" stickers at a polling station.
Iowa
Aug 2025

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Selcuk v. Pate

Just two weeks out from the November 2024 presidential election, Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate issued a directive to county clerks to challenge more than 2,000 voters at the polls on Election Day and force them to vote a provisional ballot that will count only if the voter can prove their citizenship. The Secretary鈥檚 list of more than 2,000 voters does not adequately account for Iowans who have recently become U.S. citizens through naturalization, and thus risks disenfranchising scores of eligible voters based on national origin. The Secretary鈥檚 eleventh-hour gambit violates several provisions of the U.S. Constitution and federal law, and we have thus filed emergency suit to enjoin the directive.
Explore case
Selcuk V. Pate. Explore Case.
Iowa
Aug 2025
A volunteer prepares "I Voted" stickers at a polling station.

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Selcuk v. Pate

Just two weeks out from the November 2024 presidential election, Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate issued a directive to county clerks to challenge more than 2,000 voters at the polls on Election Day and force them to vote a provisional ballot that will count only if the voter can prove their citizenship. The Secretary鈥檚 list of more than 2,000 voters does not adequately account for Iowans who have recently become U.S. citizens through naturalization, and thus risks disenfranchising scores of eligible voters based on national origin. The Secretary鈥檚 eleventh-hour gambit violates several provisions of the U.S. Constitution and federal law, and we have thus filed emergency suit to enjoin the directive.
Selcuk V. Pate. Explore Case.
With and American flag in the background, four people in the act of voting, stand behind voter booths as they make their selections.
Pennsylvania
Aug 2025

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Eakin v. Adams County Board of Elections (Amicus)

In November 2022, thousands of Pennsylvania voters were denied the right to vote based on a meaningless paperwork error. They filled out their mail ballots, signed the form on the outer return envelope, and returned their ballots on time. Yet their ballots were not counted, because they either forgot to write the date on their return envelope, or they accidentally wrote the wrong date. We're fighting to make sure that every vote counts
Explore case
Eakin V. Adams County Board Of Elections (amicus). Explore Case.
Pennsylvania
Aug 2025
With and American flag in the background, four people in the act of voting, stand behind voter booths as they make their selections.

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Eakin v. Adams County Board of Elections (Amicus)

In November 2022, thousands of Pennsylvania voters were denied the right to vote based on a meaningless paperwork error. They filled out their mail ballots, signed the form on the outer return envelope, and returned their ballots on time. Yet their ballots were not counted, because they either forgot to write the date on their return envelope, or they accidentally wrote the wrong date. We're fighting to make sure that every vote counts
Eakin V. Adams County Board Of Elections (amicus). Explore Case.
FOIA
Washington, D.C.
Aug 2025

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Bower v. Social Security Administration

Representing itself and two journalists from Lawfare, the 桃子视频 brought a lawsuit to enforce Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests made to the Social Security Administration and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services regarding changes made to the SAVE program, which has been touted as being used by states in order to remove voters from the registration rolls. While the government made public statements about the SAVE program being updated, the details of those changes, such as the particular programs and databases that have been altered, the ways they have been altered, and the nature and extent of any use and sharing of individuals鈥 personal information by the federal agencies entrusted with that information, have all been kept secret.
Explore case
Bower V. Social Security Administration. Explore Case.
Washington, D.C.
Aug 2025
FOIA

Fighting Cuts to Voting Access

Bower v. Social Security Administration

Representing itself and two journalists from Lawfare, the 桃子视频 brought a lawsuit to enforce Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests made to the Social Security Administration and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services regarding changes made to the SAVE program, which has been touted as being used by states in order to remove voters from the registration rolls. While the government made public statements about the SAVE program being updated, the details of those changes, such as the particular programs and databases that have been altered, the ways they have been altered, and the nature and extent of any use and sharing of individuals鈥 personal information by the federal agencies entrusted with that information, have all been kept secret.
Bower V. Social Security Administration. Explore Case.
34
5
67...