Texas

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Reproductive Freedom

Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ joined over 200 reproductive health, rights, and justice organizations in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of an emergency request to stay a decision issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that severely restricted the use of mifepristone — a medication used in most abortions in this country — and threatened the innovation of new drugs and the ability of Americans to access lifesaving drugs.
Danco Laboratories, Llc, V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine; U.s. Fda V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

Reproductive Freedom

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Texas, and coalition partners filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of abortion providers and funds on July 13, 2021, challenging S.B. 8, a Texas law allowing private citizens to enforce a ban on abortion as early as six weeks in pregnancy—before many know they are pregnant. The ACLU’s challenge made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court three times in as many months. After hearing oral arguments in the case, the Court issued a decision on December 10, 2021, that ended the most promising pathways to blocking the ban. The Supreme Court’s decision makes it more difficult to obtain adequate relief from the courts and gives states the green light to ban abortion using bounty-hunting schemes. Texas’ abortion ban will remain in effect until relief can be secured from a court.
Whole Woman's Health V. Jackson. Explore Case.
Texas
Jul 2021
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Prisoners' Rights

Criminal Law Reform

Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
Sanchez Et Al V. Dallas County Sheriff Et Al. Explore Case.

All Cases

46 Texas Cases

Garza v. Hargan - Challenge to Trump Administration's Attempts to Block Abortions for Young Immigrant Women
Texas
Aug 2018

Immigrants' Rights

Reproductive Freedom

Garza v. Hargan - Challenge to Trump Administration's Attempts to Block Abortions for Young Immigrant Women

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas taken the Trump administration to court over its new policy of preventing young immigrant women from having abortions they want. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµrepresents a 17-year-old woman who came to the United States without her parents and who is currently residing in a government-funded shelter in Texas. The Trump administration will not allow her to leave the shelter in order to get an abortion.
Explore case
Garza V. Hargan - Challenge To Trump Administration's Attempts To Block Abortions For Young Immigrant Women. Explore Case.
Texas
Aug 2018
Garza v. Hargan - Challenge to Trump Administration's Attempts to Block Abortions for Young Immigrant Women

Immigrants' Rights

Reproductive Freedom

Garza v. Hargan - Challenge to Trump Administration's Attempts to Block Abortions for Young Immigrant Women

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas taken the Trump administration to court over its new policy of preventing young immigrant women from having abortions they want. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµrepresents a 17-year-old woman who came to the United States without her parents and who is currently residing in a government-funded shelter in Texas. The Trump administration will not allow her to leave the shelter in order to get an abortion.
Garza V. Hargan - Challenge To Trump Administration's Attempts To Block Abortions For Young Immigrant Women. Explore Case.
R.M.H. v. Lloyd
Texas
Nov 2017

Immigrants' Rights

R.M.H. v. Lloyd

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Texas filed a federal lawsuit seeking to free 10-year-old Rosa Maria Hernandez from government custody and reunite her with her family.
Explore case
R.m.h. V. Lloyd. Explore Case.
Texas
Nov 2017
R.M.H. v. Lloyd

Immigrants' Rights

R.M.H. v. Lloyd

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Texas filed a federal lawsuit seeking to free 10-year-old Rosa Maria Hernandez from government custody and reunite her with her family.
R.m.h. V. Lloyd. Explore Case.
City of El Cenizo et al v. State of Texas et al
Texas
Aug 2017

Immigrants' Rights

City of El Cenizo et al v. State of Texas et al

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Texas filed the first motion to block the anti-immigrant and anti-law enforcement Texas Senate Bill (SB4) before it takes effect.
Explore case
City Of El Cenizo Et Al V. State Of Texas Et Al. Explore Case.
Texas
Aug 2017
City of El Cenizo et al v. State of Texas et al

Immigrants' Rights

City of El Cenizo et al v. State of Texas et al

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Texas filed the first motion to block the anti-immigrant and anti-law enforcement Texas Senate Bill (SB4) before it takes effect.
City Of El Cenizo Et Al V. State Of Texas Et Al. Explore Case.
Moore v. Texas
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2017

Capital Punishment

Moore v. Texas

Whether Texas is violating the Constitution by using a test to determine intellectual disability in death penalty cases that is inconsistent with both Supreme Court precedent and science.
Explore case
Moore V. Texas. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2017
Moore v. Texas

Capital Punishment

Moore v. Texas

Whether Texas is violating the Constitution by using a test to determine intellectual disability in death penalty cases that is inconsistent with both Supreme Court precedent and science.
Moore V. Texas. Explore Case.
Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. United States of America
Texas
Oct 2016

Immigrants' Rights

Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. United States of America

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Texas, National Immigration Law Center and Southern Poverty Law Center filed a legal response on behalf of the International Rescue Committee in order to prevent the State of Texas from illegally barring Syrian refugees from entering the state.
Explore case
Texas Health And Human Services Commission V. United States Of America. Explore Case.
Texas
Oct 2016
Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. United States of America

Immigrants' Rights

Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. United States of America

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Texas, National Immigration Law Center and Southern Poverty Law Center filed a legal response on behalf of the International Rescue Committee in order to prevent the State of Texas from illegally barring Syrian refugees from entering the state.
Texas Health And Human Services Commission V. United States Of America. Explore Case.