Texas

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Reproductive Freedom

Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ joined over 200 reproductive health, rights, and justice organizations in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of an emergency request to stay a decision issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that severely restricted the use of mifepristone — a medication used in most abortions in this country — and threatened the innovation of new drugs and the ability of Americans to access lifesaving drugs.
Danco Laboratories, Llc, V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine; U.s. Fda V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

Reproductive Freedom

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Texas, and coalition partners filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of abortion providers and funds on July 13, 2021, challenging S.B. 8, a Texas law allowing private citizens to enforce a ban on abortion as early as six weeks in pregnancy—before many know they are pregnant. The ACLU’s challenge made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court three times in as many months. After hearing oral arguments in the case, the Court issued a decision on December 10, 2021, that ended the most promising pathways to blocking the ban. The Supreme Court’s decision makes it more difficult to obtain adequate relief from the courts and gives states the green light to ban abortion using bounty-hunting schemes. Texas’ abortion ban will remain in effect until relief can be secured from a court.
Whole Woman's Health V. Jackson. Explore Case.
Texas
Jul 2021
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Prisoners' Rights

Criminal Law Reform

Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
Sanchez Et Al V. Dallas County Sheriff Et Al. Explore Case.

All Cases

46 Texas Cases

Texas v. U.S.
Texas
Aug 2016

LGBTQ Rights

Texas v. U.S.

Five leading national civil and LGBT rights organizations filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief in a multi-state lawsuit challenging the Federal Government issued guidance regarding public school districts’ responsibility to allow transgender students to use the same restrooms as other students.
Explore case
Texas V. U.s.. Explore Case.
Texas
Aug 2016
Texas v. U.S.

LGBTQ Rights

Texas v. U.S.

Five leading national civil and LGBT rights organizations filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief in a multi-state lawsuit challenging the Federal Government issued guidance regarding public school districts’ responsibility to allow transgender students to use the same restrooms as other students.
Texas V. U.s.. Explore Case.
Paul Reid in July 1980 (l), Police Composite Bowling-Alley Murders (m), Max Soffar (r)
Texas
Feb 2015

Capital Punishment

State of Texas v. Max Soffar

An innocent man is dying of terminal liver cancer on Texas's Death Row.
Explore case
State Of Texas V. Max Soffar. Explore Case.
Texas
Feb 2015
Paul Reid in July 1980 (l), Police Composite Bowling-Alley Murders (m), Max Soffar (r)

Capital Punishment

State of Texas v. Max Soffar

An innocent man is dying of terminal liver cancer on Texas's Death Row.
State Of Texas V. Max Soffar. Explore Case.
Manuel Velez
Texas
Oct 2014

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Manuel Velez v. The State of Texas

Manuel Velez, an innocent man, was released from a Texas prison today after almost nine years behind bars, four on death row. Rather than risk a new trial that could be plagued with the same problems that sent him to death row, Velez, an ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµclient, pleaded no contest to a lesser charge.
Explore case
Manuel Velez V. The State Of Texas. Explore Case.
Texas
Oct 2014
Manuel Velez

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Manuel Velez v. The State of Texas

Manuel Velez, an innocent man, was released from a Texas prison today after almost nine years behind bars, four on death row. Rather than risk a new trial that could be plagued with the same problems that sent him to death row, Velez, an ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµclient, pleaded no contest to a lesser charge.
Manuel Velez V. The State Of Texas. Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
Texas
Mar 2014

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood v. Abbott

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Center for Reproductive Rights and Texas law firm George Brothers Kincaid & Horton have filed a lawsuit in federal court on behalf of their clients (over a dozen women's health care providers) to block harmful and unconstitutional provisions of a recently enacted Texas law that would force a third of the health centers that currently offer abortion care to stop providing abortions altogether.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood V. Abbott. Explore Case.
Texas
Mar 2014
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood v. Abbott

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Center for Reproductive Rights and Texas law firm George Brothers Kincaid & Horton have filed a lawsuit in federal court on behalf of their clients (over a dozen women's health care providers) to block harmful and unconstitutional provisions of a recently enacted Texas law that would force a third of the health centers that currently offer abortion care to stop providing abortions altogether.
Planned Parenthood V. Abbott. Explore Case.
Estrada v. The State of Texas
Texas
Apr 2011

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Estrada v. The State of Texas

Jurors in Estrada's 2007 sentencing trial were incorrectly told by a State's prison expert that if Estrada were given a sentence of life without parole instead of the death penalty, he could be eligible for a classification level that would allow him to leave the prison grounds after 10 years of imprisonment. Two juror notes strongly suggested that the expert's false testimony led to their decision to sentence Estrada to death. Prosecutors' use of false and misleading evidence is a leading cause of wrongful death sentences in Texas and nationwide.
Explore case
Estrada V. The State Of Texas. Explore Case.
Texas
Apr 2011
Estrada v. The State of Texas

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Estrada v. The State of Texas

Jurors in Estrada's 2007 sentencing trial were incorrectly told by a State's prison expert that if Estrada were given a sentence of life without parole instead of the death penalty, he could be eligible for a classification level that would allow him to leave the prison grounds after 10 years of imprisonment. Two juror notes strongly suggested that the expert's false testimony led to their decision to sentence Estrada to death. Prosecutors' use of false and misleading evidence is a leading cause of wrongful death sentences in Texas and nationwide.
Estrada V. The State Of Texas. Explore Case.
78
9
10