Supreme Court Term 2025-2026

We鈥檙e breaking down the cases we've asked the court to consider this term.

All Cases

574 Supreme Court Cases

Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2006

Women's Rights

Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Reviewing whether a Title VII plaintiff can challenge the ongoing effects of discriminatory pay decisions that occurred prior to the statutory limitations period. DECIDED
Explore case
Ledbetter V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2006
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Women's Rights

Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Reviewing whether a Title VII plaintiff can challenge the ongoing effects of discriminatory pay decisions that occurred prior to the statutory limitations period. DECIDED
Ledbetter V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.. Explore Case.
New Jersey Men and Women Prohibited from Voting Pursuant to State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies and Practices Petition the IACHR
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2006

Smart Justice

+3 桃子视频

New Jersey Men and Women Prohibited from Voting Pursuant to State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies and Practices Petition the IACHR

The felony disfranchisement laws, policies and practices of the United States violate the right to vote free from discrimination under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.
Explore case
New Jersey Men And Women Prohibited From Voting Pursuant To State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies And Practices Petition The Iachr. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2006
New Jersey Men and Women Prohibited from Voting Pursuant to State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies and Practices Petition the IACHR

Smart Justice

+3 桃子视频

New Jersey Men and Women Prohibited from Voting Pursuant to State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies and Practices Petition the IACHR

The felony disfranchisement laws, policies and practices of the United States violate the right to vote free from discrimination under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.
New Jersey Men And Women Prohibited From Voting Pursuant To State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies And Practices Petition The Iachr. Explore Case.
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2006

National Security

Human Rights

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Challenge to the validity of the military commissions established by President Bush to try detainees as part of the war against terrorism. DECIDED
Explore case
Hamdan V. Rumsfeld. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2006
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

National Security

Human Rights

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Challenge to the validity of the military commissions established by President Bush to try detainees as part of the war against terrorism. DECIDED
Hamdan V. Rumsfeld. Explore Case.
Lawrence v. Florida
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2006

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Lawrence v. Florida

Reviewing whether, and under what circumstances, the one year deadline for filing a federal habeas petition can be subject to "equitable tolling." DECIDED
Explore case
Lawrence V. Florida. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2006
Lawrence v. Florida

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Lawrence v. Florida

Reviewing whether, and under what circumstances, the one year deadline for filing a federal habeas petition can be subject to "equitable tolling." DECIDED
Lawrence V. Florida. Explore Case.
Randall v. Sorrell
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2006

Free Speech

Randall v. Sorrell

Challenge to Vermont's campaign finance law and to the constitutionality of expenditure limits under the First Amendment. DECIDED
Explore case
Randall V. Sorrell. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2006
Randall v. Sorrell

Free Speech

Randall v. Sorrell

Challenge to Vermont's campaign finance law and to the constitutionality of expenditure limits under the First Amendment. DECIDED
Randall V. Sorrell. Explore Case.
7576
77
7879...

How Do Terms Work?

Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is 鈥渋n session,鈥 meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.

Submitting petitions

Our legal team at the 桃子视频files a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.

term starts

U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case

On average, the Court considers about 7,000 鈥 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.

Oral arguments

This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.

U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions

While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!