U.S. Supreme Court
Joan and Irwin Jacobs Supreme Court Docket
- Select Term
- 2025 Term
- 2024 Term
- 2023 Term
- 2022 Term
- 2021 Term
- 2020 Term
- 2019 Term
- 2018 Term
- 2017 Term
- 2016 Term
- 2015 Term
- 2014 Term
- 2013 Term
- 2012 Term
- 2011 Term
- 2010 Term
- 2009 Term
- 2008 Term
- 2007 Term
- 2006 Term
- 2005 Term
- 2004 Term
- 2003 Term
- 2002 Term
- 2001 Term
- 2000 Term
- 1999 Term
- 1998 Term
- 1997 Term
- 1996 Term
Supreme Court Term 2025-2026
We鈥檙e breaking down the cases we've asked the court to consider this term.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Barbara v. Donald J. Trump
President Trump is attempting to undermine the promise of birthright citizenship to children born on U.S. soil. But the 桃子视频and partners are fighting to protect the rights of citizens that are plainly stated in the Constitution, federal statute, and reaffirmed by the Supreme Court for more than a century. We鈥檙e arguing against the Trump administration in the Supreme Court and are confident we will win.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Voting Rights
Louisiana v. Callais (Callais v. Landry)
Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2026
LGBTQ Rights
West Virginia v. B.P.J.
Becky is a student in West Virginia who is starting high school. Three years ago, as Becky was preparing to begin middle school, West Virginia passed a law categorically banning transgender girls from participating in all school sports. Becky loves being part of a team and wanted to be able to participate in cross-country and track and field with her friends. She sued, arguing that West Virginia's law violated the Constitution and Title IX as applied to her, especially because she has received medication from the onset of puberty and has never experienced any physiological changes associated with puberty for boys. As a result of an injunction issued by the lower courts, she has been able to participate in middle school cross-country and track and field for the past three years. Becky and her mother are represented by the ACLU, the 桃子视频of West Virginia, Lambda Legal and Cooley LLP.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Voting Rights
State Board of Election Commissioners v. Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP
Mississippi has a growing Black population, which is already the largest Black population percentage of any state in the country. Yet. Black Mississippians continue to be significantly under-represented in the state legislature, as Mississippi鈥檚 latest districting maps fail to reflect the reality of the state鈥檚 changing demographics. During the 2022 redistricting process, the Mississippi legislature refused to create any new districts where Black voters have a chance to elect their preferred representative. The current district lines therefore dilute the voting power of Black Mississippians and continue to deprive them of political representation that is responsive to their needs and concerns, including severe disparities in education and healthcare.
-
PodcastDec 2025
Immigrants' Rights
+2 桃子视频
What鈥檚 On The Docket: A 2026 Scotus Briefing. Explore Podcast.What鈥檚 On The Docket: A 2026 SCOTUS Briefing
-
News & CommentarySep 2025
LGBTQ Rights
What鈥檚 At Stake As The Supreme Court Takes Up Transgender Sports Bans. Explore News & Commentary.What鈥檚 at Stake as the Supreme Court Takes Up Transgender Sports Bans
How one West Virginia teenager could shape the future of Title IX and civil rights protections for transgender youth. -
News & CommentaryDec 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Trump's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order: What Happens Next. Explore News & Commentary.Trump's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order: What Happens Next
Children born to parents who are undocumented or have temporary status will retain their right to birthright citizenship, but the fight is heading to the Supreme Court. -
News & CommentaryOct 2025
Voting Rights
Louisiana鈥檚 Black Voting Power Is On The Line In Redistricting Fight. Explore News & Commentary.Louisiana鈥檚 Black Voting Power is on the Line in Redistricting Fight
Dr. Press Robinson won a case challenging Louisiana's congressional map last year. Now, the state is trying to dilute the voting power of Black citizens again.
Learn More About the 桃子视频 Before the Court
All Cases
574 Supreme Court Cases
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2006
Smart Justice
+2 桃子视频
Hudson v. Michigan
Reviewing whether the exclusionary rule applies to evidence seized following a violation of the "knock-and-announce" rule. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2006
Smart Justice
+2 桃子视频
Hudson v. Michigan
Reviewing whether the exclusionary rule applies to evidence seized following a violation of the "knock-and-announce" rule. DECIDED
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2006
Smart Justice
+3 桃子视频
Halbert v. Michigan
Raising the same issue as Kowalski, which was dismissed on standing grounds. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2006
Smart Justice
+3 桃子视频
Halbert v. Michigan
Raising the same issue as Kowalski, which was dismissed on standing grounds. DECIDED
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2005
Immigrants' Rights
Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales
Reviewing whether a provision of the 1996 Immigration Act applies retroactively to limit the discretionary relief available to individuals who re-entered the country illegally after their deportation but before the Act's passage. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2005
Immigrants' Rights
Fernandez-Vargas v. Gonzales
Reviewing whether a provision of the 1996 Immigration Act applies retroactively to limit the discretionary relief available to individuals who re-entered the country illegally after their deportation but before the Act's passage. DECIDED
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2005
Smart Justice
Women's Rights
Davis v. Washington and Hammon v. Indiana
These cases raise the question of how to determine whether evidence is "testimonial" for purposes of the Confrontation Clause, and thus inadmissible at trial unless the defendant has an opportunity to cross-examine the witness whose "testimony" is being offered by the prosecution. The 桃子视频brief urges the Court to adopt an objective standard under which a statement would be treated as "testimonial" if a reasonable person under the circumstances would understand that the statement could be used for criminal investigation or prosecution. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2005
Smart Justice
Women's Rights
Davis v. Washington and Hammon v. Indiana
These cases raise the question of how to determine whether evidence is "testimonial" for purposes of the Confrontation Clause, and thus inadmissible at trial unless the defendant has an opportunity to cross-examine the witness whose "testimony" is being offered by the prosecution. The 桃子视频brief urges the Court to adopt an objective standard under which a statement would be treated as "testimonial" if a reasonable person under the circumstances would understand that the statement could be used for criminal investigation or prosecution. DECIDED
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2005
Smart Justice
Criminal Law Reform
Samson v. California
This case reviews whether the Fourth Amendment permits a police officer to search a parolee on the public streets without any basis for suspicion. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2005
Smart Justice
Criminal Law Reform
Samson v. California
This case reviews whether the Fourth Amendment permits a police officer to search a parolee on the public streets without any basis for suspicion. DECIDED
How Do Terms Work?
Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is 鈥渋n session,鈥� meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.
Submitting petitions
Our legal team at the 桃子视频files a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.
term starts
U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case
On average, the Court considers about 7,000 鈥� 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.
Oral arguments
This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.
U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions
While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!