Transgender Rights

All Cases

63 Transgender Rights Cases

Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education
Oklahoma
Feb 2026

Transgender Rights

Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

Thousands of school districts across the country operate with nondiscrimination policies inclusive of their transgender students, including the legal right for these students to access facilities (bathrooms, locker rooms, etc.) consistent with their gender identity. These policies help protect transgender students from harassment, being isolated from their peers, and thrive in a learning environment that believes in their fundamental rights.
Explore case
Bridge V. Oklahoma State Department Of Education. Explore Case.
Oklahoma
Feb 2026
Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

Transgender Rights

Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

Thousands of school districts across the country operate with nondiscrimination policies inclusive of their transgender students, including the legal right for these students to access facilities (bathrooms, locker rooms, etc.) consistent with their gender identity. These policies help protect transgender students from harassment, being isolated from their peers, and thrive in a learning environment that believes in their fundamental rights.
Bridge V. Oklahoma State Department Of Education. Explore Case.
Misanin v. Wilson
South Carolina
Jan 2026

Transgender Rights

Misanin v. Wilson

Transgender South Carolinians and their families challenged a 2024 state law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth and prohibiting any state funds from supporting access to gender-affirming medical care. South Carolina’s ban led to medical providers ending treatment for transgender patients regardless of age.
Explore case
Misanin V. Wilson. Explore Case.
South Carolina
Jan 2026
Misanin v. Wilson

Transgender Rights

Misanin v. Wilson

Transgender South Carolinians and their families challenged a 2024 state law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth and prohibiting any state funds from supporting access to gender-affirming medical care. South Carolina’s ban led to medical providers ending treatment for transgender patients regardless of age.
Misanin V. Wilson. Explore Case.
PFLAG v. Abbott
Texas
Jan 2026

Transgender Rights

PFLAG v. Abbott

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, Lambda Legal, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Texas, and Baker Botts filed a lawsuit in Texas State Court on behalf of PFLAG National and three Texas families. This is the second of two lawsuits challenging unlawful attempts to ban essential health care for transgender youth by Texas state leaders.
Explore case
Pflag V. Abbott. Explore Case.
Texas
Jan 2026
PFLAG v. Abbott

Transgender Rights

PFLAG v. Abbott

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, Lambda Legal, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Texas, and Baker Botts filed a lawsuit in Texas State Court on behalf of PFLAG National and three Texas families. This is the second of two lawsuits challenging unlawful attempts to ban essential health care for transgender youth by Texas state leaders.
Pflag V. Abbott. Explore Case.
Little v. Hecox
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2026

Transgender Rights

Little v. Hecox

Lindsay is a college student at Boise State University. She wants to run on the track team so she can form friendships with other girls. A new law in Idaho would ban her from doing so because she is transgender.
Explore case
Little V. Hecox. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2026
Little v. Hecox

Transgender Rights

Little v. Hecox

Lindsay is a college student at Boise State University. She wants to run on the track team so she can form friendships with other girls. A new law in Idaho would ban her from doing so because she is transgender.
Little V. Hecox. Explore Case.
Dylan, a white boy in a black tshirt with blonde hair, and his mom, Joanna, a white women with gray hair and a pink tshirt sitting on a poarch with a peach-painted wood and green stained glass windows.
Arkansas
Dec 2025

Transgender Rights

Brandt et al v. Rutledge et al

Four families of transgender youth and two doctors have challenged an Arkansas law that would prohibit healthcare professionals from providing or even referring transgender young people for medically necessary health care. The law would also bar any state funds or insurance coverage for gender-affirming health care for transgender people under 18, and it would allow private insurers to refuse to cover gender-affirming care for people of any age. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges that House Bill 1570 is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Explore case
Brandt Et Al V. Rutledge Et Al. Explore Case.
Arkansas
Dec 2025
Dylan, a white boy in a black tshirt with blonde hair, and his mom, Joanna, a white women with gray hair and a pink tshirt sitting on a poarch with a peach-painted wood and green stained glass windows.

Transgender Rights

Brandt et al v. Rutledge et al

Four families of transgender youth and two doctors have challenged an Arkansas law that would prohibit healthcare professionals from providing or even referring transgender young people for medically necessary health care. The law would also bar any state funds or insurance coverage for gender-affirming health care for transgender people under 18, and it would allow private insurers to refuse to cover gender-affirming care for people of any age. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges that House Bill 1570 is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Brandt Et Al V. Rutledge Et Al. Explore Case.
12
3
45...