Smart Justice

Featured

Mississippi
Mar 2017
Dockery v. Hall

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Dockery v. Hall

The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated in a perpetual state of crisis where prisoners are at grave risk of death and loss of limbs. The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
Dockery V. Hall. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Smart Justice Cases

Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington

Whether a jail policy of strip searching every new detainee violates the Fourth Amendment.
Explore case
Florence V. Board Of Chosen Freeholders Of The County Of Burlington. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington

Whether a jail policy of strip searching every new detainee violates the Fourth Amendment.
Florence V. Board Of Chosen Freeholders Of The County Of Burlington. Explore Case.
J.D.B. v. North Carolina
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

J.D.B. v. North Carolina

Whether a child's age may be considered as part of the totality of circumstances in determining whether a suspect is in custody and must therefore be given Miranda warnings prior to any police interrogation.
Explore case
J.d.b. V. North Carolina. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011
J.D.B. v. North Carolina

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

J.D.B. v. North Carolina

Whether a child's age may be considered as part of the totality of circumstances in determining whether a suspect is in custody and must therefore be given Miranda warnings prior to any police interrogation.
J.d.b. V. North Carolina. Explore Case.
Flores-Villar v. United States
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Flores-Villar v. United States

Whether the government may constitutionally make it more difficult for citizen fathers than citizen mothers to transmit citizenship to their out-of-wedlock children born outside the U.S.
Explore case
Flores-villar V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011
Flores-Villar v. United States

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Flores-Villar v. United States

Whether the government may constitutionally make it more difficult for citizen fathers than citizen mothers to transmit citizenship to their out-of-wedlock children born outside the U.S.
Flores-villar V. United States. Explore Case.
Capital Punishment
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Maples v. Thomas

Whether the defendant's failure to file a timely appeal in state court should bar all subsequent federal court review of his death sentence when the reason for the missed deadline was that Alabama officials made no effort to inform him of an adverse decision from the state courts after it was returned unopened by his lawyers' former law firm.
Explore case
Maples V. Thomas. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011
Capital Punishment

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Maples v. Thomas

Whether the defendant's failure to file a timely appeal in state court should bar all subsequent federal court review of his death sentence when the reason for the missed deadline was that Alabama officials made no effort to inform him of an adverse decision from the state courts after it was returned unopened by his lawyers' former law firm.
Maples V. Thomas. Explore Case.
Brown v. Plata
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Brown v. Plata

Whether a federal court appropriately exercised its authority by ordering the State of California to reduce the size of its prison population, which was more than double the system’s intended capacity, after dozens of remedial orders had failed for more than a decade to ensure that California prisoners received constitutionally adequate medical and mental health care.
Explore case
Brown V. Plata. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011
Brown v. Plata

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Brown v. Plata

Whether a federal court appropriately exercised its authority by ordering the State of California to reduce the size of its prison population, which was more than double the system’s intended capacity, after dozens of remedial orders had failed for more than a decade to ensure that California prisoners received constitutionally adequate medical and mental health care.
Brown V. Plata. Explore Case.
1415
16
1718...