Smart Justice

Featured

Mississippi
Mar 2017
Dockery v. Hall

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Dockery v. Hall

The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated in a perpetual state of crisis where prisoners are at grave risk of death and loss of limbs. The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
Dockery V. Hall. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Smart Justice Cases

Coble v. Texas
Court Case
May 2011

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Coble v. Texas

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of Billie Wayne Coble. Mr. Coble served on Texas's death row for 18 years between his first and second capital trials. During these 18 years he proved to be a model inmate. He was never once issued a violation notice - a rare feat in prison. He was a positive role model to other inmates and consistently helped other inmates and prison guards.
Explore case
Coble V. Texas. Explore Case.
Court Case
May 2011
Coble v. Texas

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Coble v. Texas

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµhas filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of Billie Wayne Coble. Mr. Coble served on Texas's death row for 18 years between his first and second capital trials. During these 18 years he proved to be a model inmate. He was never once issued a violation notice - a rare feat in prison. He was a positive role model to other inmates and consistently helped other inmates and prison guards.
Coble V. Texas. Explore Case.
Estrada v. The State of Texas
Texas
Apr 2011

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Estrada v. The State of Texas

Jurors in Estrada's 2007 sentencing trial were incorrectly told by a State's prison expert that if Estrada were given a sentence of life without parole instead of the death penalty, he could be eligible for a classification level that would allow him to leave the prison grounds after 10 years of imprisonment. Two juror notes strongly suggested that the expert's false testimony led to their decision to sentence Estrada to death. Prosecutors' use of false and misleading evidence is a leading cause of wrongful death sentences in Texas and nationwide.
Explore case
Estrada V. The State Of Texas. Explore Case.
Texas
Apr 2011
Estrada v. The State of Texas

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Estrada v. The State of Texas

Jurors in Estrada's 2007 sentencing trial were incorrectly told by a State's prison expert that if Estrada were given a sentence of life without parole instead of the death penalty, he could be eligible for a classification level that would allow him to leave the prison grounds after 10 years of imprisonment. Two juror notes strongly suggested that the expert's false testimony led to their decision to sentence Estrada to death. Prosecutors' use of false and misleading evidence is a leading cause of wrongful death sentences in Texas and nationwide.
Estrada V. The State Of Texas. Explore Case.
Jalatzai v. Gates and Wahid v. Gates
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2011

Smart Justice

National Security

Jalatzai v. Gates and Wahid v. Gates

In February 2010, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµfiled two habeas corpus petitions challenging the illegal detention of four men who have been held — some for nearly two years — at the notorious Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. The men — who have never engaged in hostilities against the United States and are not members of groups that have engaged in hostilities against the United States — have never been told why they are being detained, been permitted to speak with a lawyer, or given a meaningful opportunity to challenge their detention before a court or a fair and impartial administrative board.
Explore case
Jalatzai V. Gates And Wahid V. Gates. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2011
Jalatzai v. Gates and Wahid v. Gates

Smart Justice

National Security

Jalatzai v. Gates and Wahid v. Gates

In February 2010, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµfiled two habeas corpus petitions challenging the illegal detention of four men who have been held — some for nearly two years — at the notorious Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. The men — who have never engaged in hostilities against the United States and are not members of groups that have engaged in hostilities against the United States — have never been told why they are being detained, been permitted to speak with a lawyer, or given a meaningful opportunity to challenge their detention before a court or a fair and impartial administrative board.
Jalatzai V. Gates And Wahid V. Gates. Explore Case.
Casey A., et al. v. Robles, et al.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2011

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Casey A., et al. v. Robles, et al.

Explore case
Casey A., Et Al. V. Robles, Et Al.. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2011
Casey A., et al. v. Robles, et al.

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Casey A., et al. v. Robles, et al.

Casey A., Et Al. V. Robles, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Turner v. Rogers
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2011

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Turner v. Rogers

Whether an indigent parent facing imprisonment for failure to pay child support is entitled to appointed counsel?
Explore case
Turner V. Rogers. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2011
Turner v. Rogers

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Turner v. Rogers

Whether an indigent parent facing imprisonment for failure to pay child support is entitled to appointed counsel?
Turner V. Rogers. Explore Case.
1516
17
1819...