Smart Justice

Featured

Mississippi
Mar 2017
Dockery v. Hall

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Dockery v. Hall

The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated in a perpetual state of crisis where prisoners are at grave risk of death and loss of limbs. The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
Dockery V. Hall. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Smart Justice Cases

Henderson et al. v. Thomas et al.
Alabama
Sep 2013

Smart Justice

+3 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Henderson et al. v. Thomas et al.

A federal judge has ruled that the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) can no longer discriminate against prisoners living with HIV by housing them separately from all other prisoners and categorically denying them equal access to prison rehabilitative programs, according to a landmark decision in a lawsuit filed by the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµNational Prison Project, the AIDS Project, and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Alabama. This ruling paves the way for prisoners living with HIV to have access to needed and appropriate services, and to the classes and training available to other prisoners.
Explore case
Henderson Et Al. V. Thomas Et Al.. Explore Case.
Alabama
Sep 2013
Henderson et al. v. Thomas et al.

Smart Justice

+3 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Henderson et al. v. Thomas et al.

A federal judge has ruled that the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) can no longer discriminate against prisoners living with HIV by housing them separately from all other prisoners and categorically denying them equal access to prison rehabilitative programs, according to a landmark decision in a lawsuit filed by the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµNational Prison Project, the AIDS Project, and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Alabama. This ruling paves the way for prisoners living with HIV to have access to needed and appropriate services, and to the classes and training available to other prisoners.
Henderson Et Al. V. Thomas Et Al.. Explore Case.
Missouri
Sep 2013

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Barrett v. Claycomb

A federal district court has ruled that a public college in Missouri must end its unconstitutional program of requiring all of its students—irrespective of their course of study—to submit to suspicionless drug-testing.
Explore case
Barrett V. Claycomb. Explore Case.
Missouri
Sep 2013

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Barrett v. Claycomb

A federal district court has ruled that a public college in Missouri must end its unconstitutional program of requiring all of its students—irrespective of their course of study—to submit to suspicionless drug-testing.
Barrett V. Claycomb. Explore Case.
Kansas v. Cheever
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2013

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Kansas v. Cheever

Whether the Fifth Amendment imposes any limits on the state's ability to introduce evidence derived from a court-ordered psychiatric examination of the defendant by the state's expert.
Explore case
Kansas V. Cheever. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2013
Kansas v. Cheever

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Kansas v. Cheever

Whether the Fifth Amendment imposes any limits on the state's ability to introduce evidence derived from a court-ordered psychiatric examination of the defendant by the state's expert.
Kansas V. Cheever. Explore Case.
BRCA
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2013

Smart Justice

+3 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics

Whether human genes can be patented.
Explore case
Association For Molecular Pathology V. Myriad Genetics. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2013
BRCA

Smart Justice

+3 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics

Whether human genes can be patented.
Association For Molecular Pathology V. Myriad Genetics. Explore Case.
DNA
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2013

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Maryland v. King

Whether collecting and analyzing DNA samples from arrestees without a warrant or consent violates the Fourth Amendment.
Explore case
Maryland V. King. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2013
DNA

Smart Justice

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Maryland v. King

Whether collecting and analyzing DNA samples from arrestees without a warrant or consent violates the Fourth Amendment.
Maryland V. King. Explore Case.
910
11
1213...