Smart Justice

Featured

Mississippi
Mar 2017
Dockery v. Hall

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Dockery v. Hall

The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated in a perpetual state of crisis where prisoners are at grave risk of death and loss of limbs. The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
Dockery V. Hall. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Smart Justice Cases

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2013

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Missouri v. McNeely

Whether every person arrested for drunk driving can be forced to submit to a blood test without consent and without a warrant.
Explore case
Missouri V. Mcneely. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2013

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Missouri v. McNeely

Whether every person arrested for drunk driving can be forced to submit to a blood test without consent and without a warrant.
Missouri V. Mcneely. Explore Case.
Morrow v. City of Tenaha
Court Case
Mar 2013

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Morrow v. City of Tenaha, et al.

Beginning in 2006, under the guise of looking for criminal activity, the police in Tenaha, Texas stopped, searched, and often seized property from Blacks and Latinos traveling through town with no suspicion of criminal activity.
Explore case
Morrow V. City Of Tenaha, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Mar 2013
Morrow v. City of Tenaha

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Morrow v. City of Tenaha, et al.

Beginning in 2006, under the guise of looking for criminal activity, the police in Tenaha, Texas stopped, searched, and often seized property from Blacks and Latinos traveling through town with no suspicion of criminal activity.
Morrow V. City Of Tenaha, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Salinas v. Texas
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2013

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Salinas v. Texas

Whether the Fifth Amendment prohibits the prosecution from commenting at trial on a defendant’s silence when questioned by the police prior to Miranda warnings.
Explore case
Salinas V. Texas. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2013
Salinas v. Texas

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Salinas v. Texas

Whether the Fifth Amendment prohibits the prosecution from commenting at trial on a defendant’s silence when questioned by the police prior to Miranda warnings.
Salinas V. Texas. Explore Case.
Gayle v. Napolitano
New Jersey
Jan 2013

Smart Justice

Immigrants' Rights

Gayle v. Napolitano

Gayle v. Napolitano is a class action lawsuit filed on behalf of hundreds of immigrants in New Jersey subject to mandatory immigration detention. The lawsuit challenges the federal government's policy of locking up immigrants in deportation proceedings without any chance for release on bail, even when they have strong arguments that they have a right to continue living in the United States.
Explore case
Gayle V. Napolitano. Explore Case.
New Jersey
Jan 2013
Gayle v. Napolitano

Smart Justice

Immigrants' Rights

Gayle v. Napolitano

Gayle v. Napolitano is a class action lawsuit filed on behalf of hundreds of immigrants in New Jersey subject to mandatory immigration detention. The lawsuit challenges the federal government's policy of locking up immigrants in deportation proceedings without any chance for release on bail, even when they have strong arguments that they have a right to continue living in the United States.
Gayle V. Napolitano. Explore Case.
Petitions Filed Under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act
Court Case
Dec 2012

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Petitions Filed Under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act

On August 3, 2010, five North Carolina death row inmates filed claims under their state's landmark legislation, the Racial Justice Act. The law, which passed in August 2009, requires that courts enter a life sentence for any death row defendant who proves that race was a factor in the imposition of his or her death sentence.
Explore case
Petitions Filed Under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2012
Petitions Filed Under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act

Smart Justice

Capital Punishment

Petitions Filed Under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act

On August 3, 2010, five North Carolina death row inmates filed claims under their state's landmark legislation, the Racial Justice Act. The law, which passed in August 2009, requires that courts enter a life sentence for any death row defendant who proves that race was a factor in the imposition of his or her death sentence.
Petitions Filed Under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act. Explore Case.
1011
12
1314...