Fighting Voter Suppression

All Cases

94 Fighting Voter Suppression Cases

SC license
South Carolina
Oct 2024

Fighting Voter Suppression

ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ of South Carolina v. State Election Commission

The South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles (SCDMV) has unlawfully denied young, eligible South Carolinians the opportunity to register to vote. Under South Carolina law, individuals who are 17 years old may register to vote and vote in primary elections so long as they (1) will turn 18 on or before the next general election, and (2) otherwise meet the qualifications for voting. An administrative error in the SCDMV's processes, however has stopped the Department from transmitting the proper paperwork to complete all registration information to the South Carolina Elections Commission. As a result, thousands of young voters who did everything right and should have been registered to vote have not been added to the state's voter rolls in the runup to the 2024 general election. ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof South Carolina sued, asking the court to ensure that these new voters are registered and properly notified in time for them to vote in the November 2024 election.
Explore case
ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ Of South Carolina V. State Election Commission. Explore Case.
South Carolina
Oct 2024
SC license

Fighting Voter Suppression

ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ of South Carolina v. State Election Commission

The South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles (SCDMV) has unlawfully denied young, eligible South Carolinians the opportunity to register to vote. Under South Carolina law, individuals who are 17 years old may register to vote and vote in primary elections so long as they (1) will turn 18 on or before the next general election, and (2) otherwise meet the qualifications for voting. An administrative error in the SCDMV's processes, however has stopped the Department from transmitting the proper paperwork to complete all registration information to the South Carolina Elections Commission. As a result, thousands of young voters who did everything right and should have been registered to vote have not been added to the state's voter rolls in the runup to the 2024 general election. ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof South Carolina sued, asking the court to ensure that these new voters are registered and properly notified in time for them to vote in the November 2024 election.
ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ Of South Carolina V. State Election Commission. Explore Case.
Wisconsin vote
Wisconsin
Oct 2024

Fighting Voter Suppression

Eucke v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

Just weeks before Election Day, three individuals filed a lawsuit asking a court to initiate an improper purge of Milwaukee voters from the voter rolls. We moved to intervene to protect voters from being purged based on unreliable information.
Explore case
Eucke V. Wisconsin Elections Commission. Explore Case.
Wisconsin
Oct 2024
Wisconsin vote

Fighting Voter Suppression

Eucke v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

Just weeks before Election Day, three individuals filed a lawsuit asking a court to initiate an improper purge of Milwaukee voters from the voter rolls. We moved to intervene to protect voters from being purged based on unreliable information.
Eucke V. Wisconsin Elections Commission. Explore Case.
Ohio Dropbox
Ohio Supreme Court
Oct 2024

Fighting Voter Suppression

Ohio Democratic Party v. LaRose (Amicus)

Just weeks before absentee voting begins in Ohio, Secretary LaRose issued Directive 2024-21 to curtail the use of drop boxes. The directive deprives everyone who is lawfully assisting another voter from using a drop box, and mandates that drop boxes may be used only by voters who are returning their own ballot. We filed an amicus brief to explain the harsh, unnecessary burdens this directive will impose on voters and election officials alike.
Explore case
Ohio Democratic Party V. Larose (amicus). Explore Case.
Ohio Supreme Court
Oct 2024
Ohio Dropbox

Fighting Voter Suppression

Ohio Democratic Party v. LaRose (Amicus)

Just weeks before absentee voting begins in Ohio, Secretary LaRose issued Directive 2024-21 to curtail the use of drop boxes. The directive deprives everyone who is lawfully assisting another voter from using a drop box, and mandates that drop boxes may be used only by voters who are returning their own ballot. We filed an amicus brief to explain the harsh, unnecessary burdens this directive will impose on voters and election officials alike.
Ohio Democratic Party V. Larose (amicus). Explore Case.
clark nv
Nevada
Oct 2024

Fighting Voter Suppression

Citizen Outreach Foundation v. Portillo

On the eve of the November 2024 presidential election, a third-party organization has challenged about 20,000 voters in Clark County, Nevada on the basis of purportedly improper residency. When Clark County rightly declined to process these challenges as improper under Nevada law, the third-party organization sued to compel the county to act on the challenges. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµVoting Rights Project and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Nevada have moved to intervene in the case to prevent mass disenfranchisement of Clark County voters mere weeks out from the 2024 general election.
Explore case
Citizen Outreach Foundation V. Portillo. Explore Case.
Nevada
Oct 2024
clark nv

Fighting Voter Suppression

Citizen Outreach Foundation v. Portillo

On the eve of the November 2024 presidential election, a third-party organization has challenged about 20,000 voters in Clark County, Nevada on the basis of purportedly improper residency. When Clark County rightly declined to process these challenges as improper under Nevada law, the third-party organization sued to compel the county to act on the challenges. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµVoting Rights Project and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Nevada have moved to intervene in the case to prevent mass disenfranchisement of Clark County voters mere weeks out from the 2024 general election.
Citizen Outreach Foundation V. Portillo. Explore Case.
Nevada
Nevada
Oct 2024

Fighting Voter Suppression

Citizen Outreach Foundation v. Burgess

On the eve of the November 2024 presidential election, a third-party organization has challenged about 11,000 voters in Washoe County, Nevada on the basis of purportedly improper residency. When Washoe County rightly declined to process these challenges as improper under Nevada law, the third-party organization sued to compel the county to act on the challenges. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµVoting Rights Project and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Nevada have moved to intervene in the case to prevent mass disenfranchisement of Washoe County voters mere weeks out from the 2024 general election.
Explore case
Citizen Outreach Foundation V. Burgess. Explore Case.
Nevada
Oct 2024
Nevada

Fighting Voter Suppression

Citizen Outreach Foundation v. Burgess

On the eve of the November 2024 presidential election, a third-party organization has challenged about 11,000 voters in Washoe County, Nevada on the basis of purportedly improper residency. When Washoe County rightly declined to process these challenges as improper under Nevada law, the third-party organization sued to compel the county to act on the challenges. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµVoting Rights Project and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Nevada have moved to intervene in the case to prevent mass disenfranchisement of Washoe County voters mere weeks out from the 2024 general election.
Citizen Outreach Foundation V. Burgess. Explore Case.
89
10
1112...