Little v. Hecox

Location: Idaho
Court Type: U.S. Supreme Court
Status: Closed
Last Update: August 6, 2026

What's at Stake

Lindsay is a college student at Boise State University. She wants to run on the track team so she can form friendships with other girls. A new law in Idaho would ban her from doing so because she is transgender.

Summary


Update: On June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court upheld Idaho鈥檚 sports ban, holding that the law does not violate either Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause. Read more about the ruling here.

Among the dozens of anti-trans laws introduced in 2020 was Idaho鈥檚 HB 500, which bans women and girls who are transgender and many women and girls who are intersex from participating in sports. Governor Brad Little signed the law, making Idaho the first state to impose an outright ban on participation of transgender student athletes.

Idaho already had one of the most restrictive policies in the country regulating participation of transgender athletes in high school athletics. This restrictive policy, which was replaced by HB 500鈥檚 outright ban on participation, required girls who are transgender to complete one year of hormone therapy as part of gender transition before competing in girls鈥� sports. Under the Idaho law, girls and women who are transgender were categorically barred from participation under any circumstances, and at all levels of competition.

Lindsay is represented by the 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Idaho, Legal Voice, and Cooley LLP.

As a result of an injunction issued by the lower courts at the beginning of the case, our client Lindsay has been able to try out for club sports at her college, and played on the club soccer team.

On June 30, 2025, the Supreme Court granted Idaho鈥檚 request to review the lower courts' decision.

Press Releases


News & Commentary


Other Documents


Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts

Related 桃子视频