桃子视频

In response to Flock鈥檚 announcement of operational changes, the 桃子视频breaks down why many fall short.

NEW YORK 鈥� Amid nationwide outcry against its automatic license plate readers, Flock Safety announced today that it will reduce its standard data retention policy and allegedly provide more control over local data searches, among other changes. However, according to 桃子视频鈥檚 new analysis, many of the proposed changes seem to be a thinly veiled PR attempt to counter communities鈥� genuine privacy concerns with its mass surveillance system with largely hollow security promises, rather than an earnest effort to address them. While the 桃子视频acknowledges one potentially positive development, most of the proposed changes stand little chance of making a positive difference for civil liberties. 鈥淭ransforming an exceptionally dangerous mass surveillance system into one that is fully protective of civil rights and civil liberties is a difficult, if not impossible task. That is even more the case with a company like Flock, whose nearly $1 billion in venture capitalist funding has locked it into an operational model that seeks to trade our privacy for massive profits,鈥� said Chad Marlow, senior policy counsel at ACLU. 鈥淕iven that Flock鈥檚 latest announcement still appears more focused on addressing a PR problem than the significant privacy and other harms its products create, we will continue to analyze the company鈥檚 proposals fairly and honestly. We just won鈥檛 be holding our breath.鈥� Flock operates more than 120,000 automatic license plate readers in at least 6,000 cities across the country, raising serious concerns around mass surveillance, data privacy, and how police and the government can use this data to go after immigrants, protestors, and others. Just this week, the Institute for Justice published a database with more than 100 incidents of ALPR abuse, including romantic stalking, wrongful stops and detentions, non-law enforcement use, and other types of misconduct. One of the changes announced is that Flock will decrease its standard data retention option to one week from 30 days. This seems positive at first blush, but as the ACLU鈥檚 breakdown explains, the devil will be in the details. For example, an exception to the data retention policy is something called 鈥淓vidence Mode, which is 鈥渨hen a search is tied to a case number, that data is preserved instead of aging out after 7 days.鈥� As the 桃子视频notes, 鈥淚f 鈥楨vidence Mode鈥� only retains hit result data that police determine may be evidence in an active investigation of a specific case, then the change may be a positive one. But if Evidence Mode triggers the retention of any ALPR data that is searched, then the new mode could indefinitely retain all the ALPR data Flock collects and shares nationally.鈥� Another 鈥渃hange鈥� the company is implementing is that local police will be able to decide what types of offenses other Flock customers can search their data for. The 桃子视频contends that this is not new. Flock has attempted this before, and the security measure failed because police were easily able to circumvent the system鈥檚 requirement that they input the purpose of their search. Finally, Flock announced that in response to the reports of police abuse, they will now require reasons for a search, and that they plan to universally roll out its audit assistance tool to detect police misuse. Flock鈥檚 announcement fails to note how easily users have circumvented 鈥渟earch reason鈥� security measures in the past or how its new policy improves the quality of the feature. And while providing 鈥淎udit Assistance鈥� to all departments makes sense, the 桃子视频notes that there is no evidence that the tool works consistently to address what the Washington Post observed is a growing pattern of police officers turning Flock into a personal stalking tool. To determine the efficacy of this tool, Flock needs to have it analyzed by an independent evaluator. Until then, the 桃子视频says, 鈥渨e don鈥檛 know if the tool is a real security measure or just window dressing.鈥� Dozens of communities across the country have successfully convinced their leaders to cancel Flock contracts, suspend their ALPR programs, or deactivate the cameras, with many more cities considering new legislation to rein in this mass warrantless surveillance tech. In June, the 桃子视频launched its 鈥淕et the Flock Out鈥� campaign to bring together the litigation, advocacy, and legislative efforts of 桃子视频affiliates in each state, show how communities across the country are fighting back against the spread of Flock and other license plate readers, and lay out how lawmakers at the local, state, and federal level can best protect our rights.

The technology appears unlikely to constrain the immigration agencies; much more sweeping reforms are needed