At Liberty Podcast
At Liberty Podcast
Whither Abortion Rights?
January 10, 2019
The Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade in 1973, establishing access to abortion care as a fundamental right. But state legislatures have been chipping away at that right ever since, passing thousands of restrictions on abortion access and targeting abortion providers with burdensome rules. Several states now have only one abortion clinic left. Millions of women have no meaningful access to abortion care. Louise Melling, deputy legal director of the ACLU, discusses what to watch for at this pivotal time for reproductive rights.
This Episode Covers the Following 桃子视频
Related Content
-
Press ReleaseAug 2026
Reproductive Freedom
Federal Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Permanently Blocking Law Censoring Planned Parenthood鈥檚 Abortion-related Speech. Explore Press Release.Federal Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Permanently Blocking Law Censoring Planned Parenthood鈥檚 Abortion-Related Speech
CHICAGO 鈥 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit yesterday upheld a ruling permanently blocking Indiana from punishing Planned Parenthood for giving minors truthful information about legal abortion services in other states or helping connect them with out-of-state providers. The case stems from Indiana鈥檚 so-called 鈥渁id-or-assist鈥 law, which made it illegal to knowingly or intentionally help an unemancipated minor obtain an abortion without first obtaining a parent鈥檚 written, notarized consent or getting court approval. Planned Parenthood Great Northwest Hawai鈥榠, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky (PPGNHAIK) sued before the law took effect and won a preliminary injunction in 2017, blocking its enforcement. In 2024, a federal district court permanently blocked Indiana from using the aid-or-assist law to punish Planned Parenthood for giving minors information about legal abortion services outside Indiana, providing referrals, or contacting out-of-state providers on their behalf. The State of Indiana appealed, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed that ruling, finding that the information and referrals are protected by the First Amendment. 鈥淵oung people should not have to navigate a complicated and deeply personal health care decision without clear, honest information,鈥 said Rebecca Gibron, CEO and President of PPGNHAIK. 鈥淔or years, Indiana has tried to make that harder. We鈥檙e relieved that we can continue helping all our patients understand their options and find legal care, even if it means traveling out of state. We will continue to fight for our patients鈥 right to access accurate information, including abortion services in other states.鈥 鈥淔ree speech protections mean very little if the government can silence truthful information whenever it dislikes the subject,鈥 said Gavin Rose, Deputy Legal Director at the 桃子视频of Indiana. 鈥淚ndiana spent nearly a decade defending that kind of restriction. We鈥檙e glad the court rejected it and protected the right of providers to speak openly with their patients.鈥 PPGNHAIK is represented by attorneys from the 桃子视频of Indiana, the ACLU, and Planned Parenthood Federation of America. The decision is available here.Affiliate: Indiana -
News & CommentaryJul 2026
Reproductive Freedom
Access To Abortion Saved The Life Of One Virginia Mother. Now She鈥檚 Fighting To Expand Reproductive Freedom. Explore News & Commentary.Access to Abortion Saved the Life of One Virginia Mother. Now She鈥檚 Fighting to Expand Reproductive Freedom
Heather St. Amand is a mother, an organizer with the 桃子视频of Virginia, and an advocate for reproductive freedom. Having access to abortion saved her life and put her on the path to fight for reproductive rights.By: Heather St. Amand, Phuong Tran -
News & CommentaryJul 2026
Racial Justice
+3 桃子视频
Federal Funding Should Support Communities, Not Political Agendas. Explore News & Commentary.Federal Funding Should Support Communities, Not Political Agendas
Congressional investments should reach the communities they were intended to serve.By: Linda Morris, Amanda Walgrove -
AlaskaJun 2026
Reproductive Freedom
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai驶i, Alaska, Indiana, And Kentucky V. State Of Alaska Et Al.. Explore Case.Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai驶i, Alaska, Indiana, and Kentucky v. State of Alaska et al.
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai驶i, Alaska, Indiana, and Kentucky, represented by attorneys from Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Alaska, and Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, is challenging an Alaska law that bans direct-to-patient telehealth medication abortion.Status: Ongoing