Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Jim Obergefell

LGBTQ Rights

Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Freedom to Marry in Ohio

The Ƶ, the Ƶof Ohio and Alphonse Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch have filed suit on behalf of Jim Obergefell and David Michener, two widowers, and Robert Grunn, a funeral director, in a challenge to the Ohio constitutional and statutory marriage recognition bans.
Obergefell, Et Al. V. Hodges - Freedom To Marry In Ohio. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Bourke Family

LGBTQ Rights

Bourke v. Beshear & Love v. Beshear - Freedom to Marry in Kentucky

Bourke v. Beshear is a federal court challenge to Kentucky's constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples, filed by attorneys at Clay Daniel Walton & Adams and Fauver Law Office on July 26, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are four same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their out-of-state marriages.
Bourke V. Beshear & Love V. Beshear - Freedom To Marry In Kentucky. Explore Case.

All Cases

13 Supreme Court Cases during the 2014 Term

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015

Racial Justice

Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project

Whether housing policies that have a disproportionate impact on racial minorities and women violate the anti-discrimination provision of the federal Fair Housing Act.
Explore case
Texas Department Of Housing & Community Affairs V. Inclusive Communities Project. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015

Racial Justice

Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project

Whether housing policies that have a disproportionate impact on racial minorities and women violate the anti-discrimination provision of the federal Fair Housing Act.
Texas Department Of Housing & Community Affairs V. Inclusive Communities Project. Explore Case.
Pregnant woman
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2015

Women's Rights

Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act prohibits an employer from denying a light-duty accommodation to pregnant workers that is available to other employees.
Explore case
Young V. United Parcel Service, Inc.. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2015
Pregnant woman

Women's Rights

Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act prohibits an employer from denying a light-duty accommodation to pregnant workers that is available to other employees.
Young V. United Parcel Service, Inc.. Explore Case.
Kingsley v. Hendrickson
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2015

Prisoners' Rights

Kingsley v. Hendrickson

Whether the Constitution protects pretrial detainees against the unreasonable use of force regardless of the subjective motivation of the guards using that force.
Explore case
Kingsley V. Hendrickson. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2015
Kingsley v. Hendrickson

Prisoners' Rights

Kingsley v. Hendrickson

Whether the Constitution protects pretrial detainees against the unreasonable use of force regardless of the subjective motivation of the guards using that force.
Kingsley V. Hendrickson. Explore Case.
Walker v. Sons of Confederate Veterans
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2015

Free Speech

Walker v. Sons of Confederate Veterans

Whether Texas violated the First Amendment by refusing to allow a specialty license plate bearing the Confederate Flag because its message was deemed offensive to many members of the public.
Explore case
Walker V. Sons Of Confederate Veterans. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2015
Walker v. Sons of Confederate Veterans

Free Speech

Walker v. Sons of Confederate Veterans

Whether Texas violated the First Amendment by refusing to allow a specialty license plate bearing the Confederate Flag because its message was deemed offensive to many members of the public.
Walker V. Sons Of Confederate Veterans. Explore Case.
City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2015

Disability Rights

City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan

Whether the ADA's requirement to make reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities applies to arrests and detentions.
Explore case
City And County Of San Francisco V. Sheehan. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2015
City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan

Disability Rights

City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan

Whether the ADA's requirement to make reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities applies to arrests and detentions.
City And County Of San Francisco V. Sheehan. Explore Case.
1
23

How Do Terms Work?

Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is “in session,” meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.

Submitting petitions

Our legal team at the Ƶfiles a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.

term starts

U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case

On average, the Court considers about 7,000 ‐ 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.

Oral arguments

This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.

U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions

While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!