All Cases

15 Supreme Court Cases during the 2004 Term

A picture of Jessica and her children
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2016

Women's Rights

Castle Rock v. Gonzales

Reviewing whether a woman whose three children were killed after being abducted by her estranged husband can raise a procedural due process claim based on the Town of Castle Rock's failure to enforce a protective order despite Colorado's mandatory arrest law. DECIDED
Explore case
Castle Rock V. Gonzales. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2016
A picture of Jessica and her children

Women's Rights

Castle Rock v. Gonzales

Reviewing whether a woman whose three children were killed after being abducted by her estranged husband can raise a procedural due process claim based on the Town of Castle Rock's failure to enforce a protective order despite Colorado's mandatory arrest law. DECIDED
Castle Rock V. Gonzales. Explore Case.
Halbert v. Michigan
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2006

Smart Justice

+3 Ƶ

Halbert v. Michigan

Raising the same issue as Kowalski, which was dismissed on standing grounds. DECIDED
Explore case
Halbert V. Michigan. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2006
Halbert v. Michigan

Smart Justice

+3 Ƶ

Halbert v. Michigan

Raising the same issue as Kowalski, which was dismissed on standing grounds. DECIDED
Halbert V. Michigan. Explore Case.
McCreary County v. ACLU
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2005

Religious Liberty

McCreary County v. Ƶ

Explore case
Mccreary County V. Aclu. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2005
McCreary County v. ACLU

Religious Liberty

McCreary County v. Ƶ

Mccreary County V. Aclu. Explore Case.
Wilkinson v. Austin
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2005

Smart Justice

+2 Ƶ

Wilkinson v. Austin

Reviewing the procedures required by due process before an Ohio prisoner can be transferred to the state's Supermax facility. DECIDED
Explore case
Wilkinson V. Austin. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2005
Wilkinson v. Austin

Smart Justice

+2 Ƶ

Wilkinson v. Austin

Reviewing the procedures required by due process before an Ohio prisoner can be transferred to the state's Supermax facility. DECIDED
Wilkinson V. Austin. Explore Case.
Cutter v. Wilkinson
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2005

National Security

Religious Liberty

Cutter v. Wilkinson

Reviewing the constitutionality of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, a federal law designed in part to protect the free exercise rights of prisoners and other institutionalized persons. DECIDED
Explore case
Cutter V. Wilkinson. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2005
Cutter v. Wilkinson

National Security

Religious Liberty

Cutter v. Wilkinson

Reviewing the constitutionality of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, a federal law designed in part to protect the free exercise rights of prisoners and other institutionalized persons. DECIDED
Cutter V. Wilkinson. Explore Case.
1
23

How Do Terms Work?

Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is “in session,” meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.

Submitting petitions

Our legal team at the Ƶfiles a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.

term starts

U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case

On average, the Court considers about 7,000 ‐ 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.

Oral arguments

This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.

U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions

While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!