South Carolina

All Cases

18 South Carolina Cases

O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina
South Carolina
Jan 2026

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina

Local library patrons, with help from the Ƶ and Ƶof South Carolina, are suing officials in South Carolina’s most populous county for systematically purging literature by and about lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people from its public library collection.
Explore case
O.r. V. Greenville County, South Carolina. Explore Case.
South Carolina
Jan 2026
O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina

Local library patrons, with help from the Ƶ and Ƶof South Carolina, are suing officials in South Carolina’s most populous county for systematically purging literature by and about lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people from its public library collection.
O.r. V. Greenville County, South Carolina. Explore Case.
Misanin v. Wilson
South Carolina
Jan 2026

LGBTQ Rights

Misanin v. Wilson

Transgender South Carolinians and their families challenged a 2024 state law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth and prohibiting any state funds from supporting access to gender-affirming medical care. South Carolina’s ban led to medical providers ending treatment for transgender patients regardless of age.
Explore case
Misanin V. Wilson. Explore Case.
South Carolina
Jan 2026
Misanin v. Wilson

LGBTQ Rights

Misanin v. Wilson

Transgender South Carolinians and their families challenged a 2024 state law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth and prohibiting any state funds from supporting access to gender-affirming medical care. South Carolina’s ban led to medical providers ending treatment for transgender patients regardless of age.
Misanin V. Wilson. Explore Case.
South CArolina Supreme
South Carolina Supreme Court
Sep 2025

Voting Rights

League of Women Voters of South Carolina v. Alexander

This case involves a state constitutional challenge to South Carolina’s 2022 congressional redistricting plan, which legislators admit was drawn to entrench a 6-1 Republican majority in the state’s federal delegation. Plaintiff the League of Women Voters of South Carolina has asked the state’s Supreme Court to conclude that the congressional map is an unlawful partisan gerrymander that violates the state constitution.
Explore case
League Of Women Voters Of South Carolina V. Alexander. Explore Case.
South Carolina Supreme Court
Sep 2025
South CArolina Supreme

Voting Rights

League of Women Voters of South Carolina v. Alexander

This case involves a state constitutional challenge to South Carolina’s 2022 congressional redistricting plan, which legislators admit was drawn to entrench a 6-1 Republican majority in the state’s federal delegation. Plaintiff the League of Women Voters of South Carolina has asked the state’s Supreme Court to conclude that the congressional map is an unlawful partisan gerrymander that violates the state constitution.
League Of Women Voters Of South Carolina V. Alexander. Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Wilson
South Carolina Supreme Court
Nov 2024

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Wilson

This case in the South Carolina Supreme Court involves the question of whether a ban on abortion, the “2023 Fetal Heartbeat Act,” forbids abortion starting after approximately nine weeks of pregnancy or, as the state contends, earlier at six weeks of pregnancy, before many people even know they are pregnant. This case is the third state supreme court proceeding in South Carolina involving a post-Dobbs challenge to an abortion ban. The outcome will substantially affect access to reproductive care in the state.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood south atlantic V. Wilson. Explore Case.
South Carolina Supreme Court
Nov 2024
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Wilson

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Wilson

This case in the South Carolina Supreme Court involves the question of whether a ban on abortion, the “2023 Fetal Heartbeat Act,” forbids abortion starting after approximately nine weeks of pregnancy or, as the state contends, earlier at six weeks of pregnancy, before many people even know they are pregnant. This case is the third state supreme court proceeding in South Carolina involving a post-Dobbs challenge to an abortion ban. The outcome will substantially affect access to reproductive care in the state.
Planned Parenthood south atlantic V. Wilson. Explore Case.
1
23...