Arizona

Featured

Arizona
Apr 2023
Prison Inside

Prisoners' Rights

Jensen v. Thornell

UPDATE: In a thorough and sweeping injunction issued on April 7, 2023, U.S. District Judge Roslyn O. Silver is requiring the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation, and Reentry (“ADCRR”) to make “substantial” changes to staffing and conditions so that medical care and mental healthcare at Arizona prisons comes up to constitutional standards.
Jensen V. Thornell. Explore Case.

All Cases

37 Arizona Cases

Gill et al. v. State of Arizona
Arizona
Feb 2026

Reproductive Freedom

Gill et al. v. State of Arizona

A group of Arizona advanced practice nurses filed a lawsuit challenging the state’s ban on the provision of abortion by trained advanced practice clinicians (APCs) such as nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives. The lawsuit, brought on behalf of the nurses by the Ƶ (ACLU), the Ƶof Arizona, and the law firm Papetti Samuels Weiss McKirgan LLP, argues that the APC ban violates Arizonans' constitutional right to abortion access, established by voters in 2024, by arbitrarily restricting their choice of provider and, more broadly, making abortion less available in the state.
Explore case
Gill Et Al. V. State Of Arizona. Explore Case.
Arizona
Feb 2026
Gill et al. v. State of Arizona

Reproductive Freedom

Gill et al. v. State of Arizona

A group of Arizona advanced practice nurses filed a lawsuit challenging the state’s ban on the provision of abortion by trained advanced practice clinicians (APCs) such as nurse practitioners and certified nurse midwives. The lawsuit, brought on behalf of the nurses by the Ƶ (ACLU), the Ƶof Arizona, and the law firm Papetti Samuels Weiss McKirgan LLP, argues that the APC ban violates Arizonans' constitutional right to abortion access, established by voters in 2024, by arbitrarily restricting their choice of provider and, more broadly, making abortion less available in the state.
Gill Et Al. V. State Of Arizona. Explore Case.
texas vote
Arizona
Jan 2026

Voting Rights

United States v. Fontes

The United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) sued Arizona demanding the release of its full, unredacted voter file, which includes the highly sensitive and personal data of every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of DOJ’s effort to build a national voter database without congressional authorization, improperly question the validity of state voter rolls, and intimidate eligible voters in Arizona and around the country.
Explore case
United States V. Fontes. Explore Case.
Arizona
Jan 2026
texas vote

Voting Rights

United States v. Fontes

The United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) sued Arizona demanding the release of its full, unredacted voter file, which includes the highly sensitive and personal data of every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of DOJ’s effort to build a national voter database without congressional authorization, improperly question the validity of state voter rolls, and intimidate eligible voters in Arizona and around the country.
United States V. Fontes. Explore Case.
Isaacson v. Arizona
Arizona
May 2025

Reproductive Freedom

Isaacson v. Arizona

Arizona doctors filed a lawsuit seeking to strike down many remaining abortion restrictions and further expand access to care in the state. One such restriction forces patients to unnecessarily make two separate trips to a clinic, delaying access to time-sensitive care for days, if not weeks. The lawsuit argues that these medically unnecessary restrictions make it harder to access abortion care and thus violate the state’s new constitutional amendment protecting the right to abortion.
Explore case
Isaacson V. Arizona. Explore Case.
Arizona
May 2025
Isaacson v. Arizona

Reproductive Freedom

Isaacson v. Arizona

Arizona doctors filed a lawsuit seeking to strike down many remaining abortion restrictions and further expand access to care in the state. One such restriction forces patients to unnecessarily make two separate trips to a clinic, delaying access to time-sensitive care for days, if not weeks. The lawsuit argues that these medically unnecessary restrictions make it harder to access abortion care and thus violate the state’s new constitutional amendment protecting the right to abortion.
Isaacson V. Arizona. Explore Case.
Reuss v. Arizona
Arizona
Dec 2024

Reproductive Freedom

Reuss v. Arizona

Arizona health care providers filed a lawsuit challenging a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which is in violation of the state’s new constitutional amendment protecting the fundamental right to abortion. The case, filed in Maricopa County Superior Court, asserts that the ban is unconstitutional because it denies Arizonans access to abortion care in violation of the new constitutional amendment passed by the voters.
Explore case
Reuss V. Arizona. Explore Case.
Arizona
Dec 2024
Reuss v. Arizona

Reproductive Freedom

Reuss v. Arizona

Arizona health care providers filed a lawsuit challenging a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which is in violation of the state’s new constitutional amendment protecting the fundamental right to abortion. The case, filed in Maricopa County Superior Court, asserts that the ban is unconstitutional because it denies Arizonans access to abortion care in violation of the new constitutional amendment passed by the voters.
Reuss V. Arizona. Explore Case.
I Voted
Arizona
Nov 2024

Voting Rights

Ƶ of Arizona v. Richer

We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice.
Explore case
Ƶ Of Arizona V. Richer. Explore Case.
Arizona
Nov 2024
I Voted

Voting Rights

Ƶ of Arizona v. Richer

We sued elections officials in Arizona to extend the mail ballot “cure” deadline after ballot processing delays threatened to disenfranchise thousands of voters without notice.
Ƶ Of Arizona V. Richer. Explore Case.
1
23...