Surveillance Technologies

All Cases

15 Surveillance Technologies Cases

Woodruff v. Oliver
Michigan
Dec 2024

Surveillance Technologies

Woodruff v. Oliver

On December 5, 2024, the Ƶand the Ƶof Michigan filed an amicus brief in Woodruff v. Oliver, a wrongful arrest lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, arguing that the Detroit Police Department’s (DPD) reliance on flawed facial recognition technology (FRT) impermissibly tainted the investigation and failed to establish probable cause for the plaintiff’s arrest.
Explore case
Woodruff V. Oliver. Explore Case.
Michigan
Dec 2024
Woodruff v. Oliver

Surveillance Technologies

Woodruff v. Oliver

On December 5, 2024, the Ƶand the Ƶof Michigan filed an amicus brief in Woodruff v. Oliver, a wrongful arrest lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, arguing that the Detroit Police Department’s (DPD) reliance on flawed facial recognition technology (FRT) impermissibly tainted the investigation and failed to establish probable cause for the plaintiff’s arrest.
Woodruff V. Oliver. Explore Case.
Robert Williams
Michigan
Jan 2024

Surveillance Technologies

+2 Ƶ

Williams v. City of Detroit

This case seeks to hold Detroit police accountable for the wrongful arrest of our client due to officers’ reliance on a false match from face recognition technology.
Explore case
Williams V. City Of Detroit. Explore Case.
Michigan
Jan 2024
Robert Williams

Surveillance Technologies

+2 Ƶ

Williams v. City of Detroit

This case seeks to hold Detroit police accountable for the wrongful arrest of our client due to officers’ reliance on a false match from face recognition technology.
Williams V. City Of Detroit. Explore Case.
Parks v. McCormac
New Jersey
Jan 2024

Surveillance Technologies

Parks v. McCormac

On January 29, 2024, the Ƶand the Ƶof New Jersey filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in support of Plaintiff Nijeer Parks. The brief argues that law enforcement’s wrongful arrest of Mr. Parks due to police reliance on unreliable facial face recognition technology violated Mr. Parks’s constitutional rights.
Explore case
Parks V. Mccormac. Explore Case.
New Jersey
Jan 2024
Parks v. McCormac

Surveillance Technologies

Parks v. McCormac

On January 29, 2024, the Ƶand the Ƶof New Jersey filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in support of Plaintiff Nijeer Parks. The brief argues that law enforcement’s wrongful arrest of Mr. Parks due to police reliance on unreliable facial face recognition technology violated Mr. Parks’s constitutional rights.
Parks V. Mccormac. Explore Case.
United States v. Hay
Kansas
Sep 2023

Surveillance Technologies

National Security

United States v. Hay

This case concerns whether long-term, continuous use of a surveillance camera targeted at a person’s home is a Fourth Amendment search.
Explore case
United States V. Hay. Explore Case.
Kansas
Sep 2023
United States v. Hay

Surveillance Technologies

National Security

United States v. Hay

This case concerns whether long-term, continuous use of a surveillance camera targeted at a person’s home is a Fourth Amendment search.
United States V. Hay. Explore Case.
Long Lake Township v. Maxon
Michigan Supreme Court
Sep 2023

Surveillance Technologies

Privacy & Technology

Long Lake Township v. Maxon

On September 8, 2023, the ACLU, the Ƶof Michigan, and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy filed an amicus brief in the Michigan Supreme Court arguing that the local government deploying an unmanned drone to take aerial photographs of the appellant’s property violated the Fourth Amendment.
Explore case
Long Lake Township V. Maxon. Explore Case.
Michigan Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Long Lake Township v. Maxon

Surveillance Technologies

Privacy & Technology

Long Lake Township v. Maxon

On September 8, 2023, the ACLU, the Ƶof Michigan, and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy filed an amicus brief in the Michigan Supreme Court arguing that the local government deploying an unmanned drone to take aerial photographs of the appellant’s property violated the Fourth Amendment.
Long Lake Township V. Maxon. Explore Case.
1
23