NSA Surveillance

All Cases

10 NSA Surveillance Cases

Upstream surveillance
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2023

NSA Surveillance

Wikimedia v. NSA - Challenge to Upstream Surveillance

The Ƶis challenging the constitutionality of the NSA’s mass interception and searching of Americans’ international Internet communications. At issue is the NSA’s “Upstream” surveillance, through which the U.S. government systematically monitors private emails, messages, and other data flowing into and out of the country on the Internet’s central arteries. The ACLU’s lawsuit was brought on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation and eight legal, human rights, and media organizations, which together engage in trillions of sensitive communications and have been harmed by Upstream surveillance.
Explore case
Wikimedia V. Nsa - Challenge To Upstream Surveillance. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2023
Upstream surveillance

NSA Surveillance

Wikimedia v. NSA - Challenge to Upstream Surveillance

The Ƶis challenging the constitutionality of the NSA’s mass interception and searching of Americans’ international Internet communications. At issue is the NSA’s “Upstream” surveillance, through which the U.S. government systematically monitors private emails, messages, and other data flowing into and out of the country on the Internet’s central arteries. The ACLU’s lawsuit was brought on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation and eight legal, human rights, and media organizations, which together engage in trillions of sensitive communications and have been harmed by Upstream surveillance.
Wikimedia V. Nsa - Challenge To Upstream Surveillance. Explore Case.
Spying
Court Case
Apr 2022

NSA Surveillance

U.S. v. Muhtorov

The Ƶand the Office of the Federal Public Defender of Colorado jointly represented Jamshid Muhtorov in challenging the warrantless surveillance of his communications under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and the lawfulness of other spying methods the government used against him. Mr. Muhtorov was the first person ever to receive notice from the government that Section 702 had been used to spy on their communications. In a split decision in December 2021, the Tenth Circuit court of appeals ruled against Mr. Muhtorov.
Explore case
U.s. V. Muhtorov. Explore Case.
Court Case
Apr 2022
Spying

NSA Surveillance

U.S. v. Muhtorov

The Ƶand the Office of the Federal Public Defender of Colorado jointly represented Jamshid Muhtorov in challenging the warrantless surveillance of his communications under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and the lawfulness of other spying methods the government used against him. Mr. Muhtorov was the first person ever to receive notice from the government that Section 702 had been used to spy on their communications. In a split decision in December 2021, the Tenth Circuit court of appeals ruled against Mr. Muhtorov.
U.s. V. Muhtorov. Explore Case.
NSA Building
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2021

NSA Surveillance

Free Speech

Ƶv. United States

The Ƶhas filed three motions in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) asking it to release secret opinions authorizing the surveillance of Americans. The public has a right to see the legal decisions addressing novel surveillance programs that affect our privacy and free speech rights — but many of the FISC’s opinions remained closely guarded secrets. After the FISC and its appeals court rejected the ACLU’s public access arguments in a series of rulings, the Ƶasked the Supreme Court to review those rulings and to recognize that the public has a First Amendment right of access to the FISC’s opinions.
Explore case
Aclu V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2021
NSA Building

NSA Surveillance

Free Speech

Ƶv. United States

The Ƶhas filed three motions in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) asking it to release secret opinions authorizing the surveillance of Americans. The public has a right to see the legal decisions addressing novel surveillance programs that affect our privacy and free speech rights — but many of the FISC’s opinions remained closely guarded secrets. After the FISC and its appeals court rejected the ACLU’s public access arguments in a series of rulings, the Ƶasked the Supreme Court to review those rulings and to recognize that the public has a First Amendment right of access to the FISC’s opinions.
Aclu V. United States. Explore Case.
NSA headquarters
Court Case
Jan 2017

NSA Surveillance

Ƶv. NSA – FOIA Lawsuit Seeking Records of Government Use of Section 702 of FISA

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international communications, and the government has used that authority to seize and search the personal communications of Americans and others on an immense scale. In September 2016, the Ƶsubmitted a Freedom of Information Act request to several government agencies seeking basic information about how the government conducts surveillance under Section 702. In November 2016, we filed a lawsuit to enforce the request in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Explore case
Aclu V. Nsa – Foia Lawsuit Seeking Records Of Government Use Of Section 702 Of Fisa. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jan 2017
NSA headquarters

NSA Surveillance

Ƶv. NSA – FOIA Lawsuit Seeking Records of Government Use of Section 702 of FISA

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international communications, and the government has used that authority to seize and search the personal communications of Americans and others on an immense scale. In September 2016, the Ƶsubmitted a Freedom of Information Act request to several government agencies seeking basic information about how the government conducts surveillance under Section 702. In November 2016, we filed a lawsuit to enforce the request in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Aclu V. Nsa – Foia Lawsuit Seeking Records Of Government Use Of Section 702 Of Fisa. Explore Case.
1
2