LGBTQ Youth

All Cases

50 LGBTQ Youth Cases

Medical professionals protest Texas legislation that would ban the gender-affirming medical care.
Texas
Feb 2026

LGBTQ Youth

Doe v. Abbott

A family in Texas had a child welfare investigator arrive at their home due to a directive from Governor Greg Abbott stating that health care that is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria should be considered a form of child abuse. This family — an employee of DFPS, her husband, and their transgender teen — sued Governor Abbott and the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Dr. Megan Mooney, a licensed psychologist who works with transgender youth and their families, also joined the lawsuit.
Explore case
Doe V. Abbott. Explore Case.
Texas
Feb 2026
Medical professionals protest Texas legislation that would ban the gender-affirming medical care.

LGBTQ Youth

Doe v. Abbott

A family in Texas had a child welfare investigator arrive at their home due to a directive from Governor Greg Abbott stating that health care that is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria should be considered a form of child abuse. This family — an employee of DFPS, her husband, and their transgender teen — sued Governor Abbott and the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Dr. Megan Mooney, a licensed psychologist who works with transgender youth and their families, also joined the lawsuit.
Doe V. Abbott. Explore Case.
Metropolitan School District of Martinsville v. A.C.
Indiana
Feb 2026

LGBTQ Youth

Metropolitan School District of Martinsville v. A.C.

Alongside his parents, A.C., a boy who was barred from using the boys’ restroom with the other boys because he is transgender, has sued his Indiana school district for violating his right under federal law to attend school.
Explore case
Metropolitan School District Of Martinsville V. A.c.. Explore Case.
Indiana
Feb 2026
Metropolitan School District of Martinsville v. A.C.

LGBTQ Youth

Metropolitan School District of Martinsville v. A.C.

Alongside his parents, A.C., a boy who was barred from using the boys’ restroom with the other boys because he is transgender, has sued his Indiana school district for violating his right under federal law to attend school.
Metropolitan School District Of Martinsville V. A.c.. Explore Case.
Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education
Oklahoma
Feb 2026

LGBTQ Youth

Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

Thousands of school districts across the country operate with nondiscrimination policies inclusive of their transgender students, including the legal right for these students to access facilities (bathrooms, locker rooms, etc.) consistent with their gender identity. These policies help protect transgender students from harassment, being isolated from their peers, and thrive in a learning environment that believes in their fundamental rights.
Explore case
Bridge V. Oklahoma State Department Of Education. Explore Case.
Oklahoma
Feb 2026
Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

LGBTQ Youth

Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

Thousands of school districts across the country operate with nondiscrimination policies inclusive of their transgender students, including the legal right for these students to access facilities (bathrooms, locker rooms, etc.) consistent with their gender identity. These policies help protect transgender students from harassment, being isolated from their peers, and thrive in a learning environment that believes in their fundamental rights.
Bridge V. Oklahoma State Department Of Education. Explore Case.
Moe v. Yost
Ohio
Jan 2026

LGBTQ Youth

Moe v. Yost

Two transgender adolescents and their families are challenging Ohio’s House Bill 68, a law passed in January 2024 that prohibits gender-affirming medical care that is widely accepted to treat gender dysphoria, helping alleviate the distress of gender dysphoria and significantly improving patients’ mental health and well-being. Such treatment is supported by leading medical experts and all major U.S. medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Explore case
Moe V. Yost. Explore Case.
Ohio
Jan 2026
Moe v. Yost

LGBTQ Youth

Moe v. Yost

Two transgender adolescents and their families are challenging Ohio’s House Bill 68, a law passed in January 2024 that prohibits gender-affirming medical care that is widely accepted to treat gender dysphoria, helping alleviate the distress of gender dysphoria and significantly improving patients’ mental health and well-being. Such treatment is supported by leading medical experts and all major U.S. medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Moe V. Yost. Explore Case.
Misanin v. Wilson
South Carolina
Jan 2026

LGBTQ Youth

Misanin v. Wilson

Transgender South Carolinians and their families challenged a 2024 state law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth and prohibiting any state funds from supporting access to gender-affirming medical care. South Carolina’s ban led to medical providers ending treatment for transgender patients regardless of age.
Explore case
Misanin V. Wilson. Explore Case.
South Carolina
Jan 2026
Misanin v. Wilson

LGBTQ Youth

Misanin v. Wilson

Transgender South Carolinians and their families challenged a 2024 state law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth and prohibiting any state funds from supporting access to gender-affirming medical care. South Carolina’s ban led to medical providers ending treatment for transgender patients regardless of age.
Misanin V. Wilson. Explore Case.
1
23...