LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
David Mullins and Charlie Craig

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

Religious Liberty

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Explore Case.

All Cases

24 LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections Cases

Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education
Oklahoma
Feb 2026

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

Thousands of school districts across the country operate with nondiscrimination policies inclusive of their transgender students, including the legal right for these students to access facilities (bathrooms, locker rooms, etc.) consistent with their gender identity. These policies help protect transgender students from harassment, being isolated from their peers, and thrive in a learning environment that believes in their fundamental rights.
Explore case
Bridge V. Oklahoma State Department Of Education. Explore Case.
Oklahoma
Feb 2026
Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

Bridge v. Oklahoma State Department of Education

Thousands of school districts across the country operate with nondiscrimination policies inclusive of their transgender students, including the legal right for these students to access facilities (bathrooms, locker rooms, etc.) consistent with their gender identity. These policies help protect transgender students from harassment, being isolated from their peers, and thrive in a learning environment that believes in their fundamental rights.
Bridge V. Oklahoma State Department Of Education. Explore Case.
Perkins et al. v. State (HB 121)
Montana
Apr 2025

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

LGBTQ Rights

Perkins et al. v. State (HB 121)

A newly enacted Montana law, HB 121, bars transgender and intersex people from using restrooms and other sex-separated facilities that correspond to their gender identity in public spaces. In doing so, HB 121 seeks to undermine transgender and intersex people’s personhood and ability to participate in public life. Together with the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Montana and Legal Voice, the ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative filed this lawsuit on behalf of a group of transgender and intersex Montanans challenging HB 121 as violating numerous provisions of the Montana Constitution.
Explore case
Perkins Et Al. V. State (hb 121). Explore Case.
Montana
Apr 2025
Perkins et al. v. State (HB 121)

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

LGBTQ Rights

Perkins et al. v. State (HB 121)

A newly enacted Montana law, HB 121, bars transgender and intersex people from using restrooms and other sex-separated facilities that correspond to their gender identity in public spaces. In doing so, HB 121 seeks to undermine transgender and intersex people’s personhood and ability to participate in public life. Together with the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Montana and Legal Voice, the ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative filed this lawsuit on behalf of a group of transgender and intersex Montanans challenging HB 121 as violating numerous provisions of the Montana Constitution.
Perkins Et Al. V. State (hb 121). Explore Case.
Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School
North Carolina
Dec 2024

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School

Lonnie Billard worked at Charlotte Catholic High School for more than a decade – both as full-time drama and as a long-term substitute teacher – and has won numerous teaching awards, including teacher of the year. In October 2014, Lonnie wrote a Facebook post announcing that he and his long-time partner were getting married. Later that year, the school told Lonnie he could no longer work as a substitute teacher because his engagement and marriage to another man was contrary to the religious principles of the Catholic Church.
Explore case
Billard V. Charlotte Catholic High School. Explore Case.
North Carolina
Dec 2024
Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School

Lonnie Billard worked at Charlotte Catholic High School for more than a decade – both as full-time drama and as a long-term substitute teacher – and has won numerous teaching awards, including teacher of the year. In October 2014, Lonnie wrote a Facebook post announcing that he and his long-time partner were getting married. Later that year, the school told Lonnie he could no longer work as a substitute teacher because his engagement and marriage to another man was contrary to the religious principles of the Catholic Church.
Billard V. Charlotte Catholic High School. Explore Case.
two 3-tier white wedding cakes, one with white flowers on top
California
Apr 2024

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

LGBTQ Rights

California Civil Rights Department v. Cathy's Creations d/b/a Tastries

On April 11, 2024, the ACLU, ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Southern California, ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Northern California, and ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof San Diego & Imperial Counties filed an amicus brief with the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District supporting the California Civil Rights Department’s appeal of a lower court judgment finding that a bakery owner did not violate the California public accommodations law when she refused to sell a wedding cake to a same-sex couple.
Explore case
California Civil Rights Department V. Cathy's Creations D/b/a Tastries. Explore Case.
California
Apr 2024
two 3-tier white wedding cakes, one with white flowers on top

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

LGBTQ Rights

California Civil Rights Department v. Cathy's Creations d/b/a Tastries

On April 11, 2024, the ACLU, ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Southern California, ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Northern California, and ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof San Diego & Imperial Counties filed an amicus brief with the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District supporting the California Civil Rights Department’s appeal of a lower court judgment finding that a bakery owner did not violate the California public accommodations law when she refused to sell a wedding cake to a same-sex couple.
California Civil Rights Department V. Cathy's Creations D/b/a Tastries. Explore Case.
SCOTUS April 2015
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

303 Creative, Inc. v. Elenis

This case concerns whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel a business that chooses to serve the public to provide wedding website design services without discriminating against a same-sex couple violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
Explore case
303 Creative, Inc. V. Elenis. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
SCOTUS April 2015

LGBTQ Nondiscrim­ination Protections

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

303 Creative, Inc. v. Elenis

This case concerns whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel a business that chooses to serve the public to provide wedding website design services without discriminating against a same-sex couple violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
303 Creative, Inc. V. Elenis. Explore Case.
1
23...