Internet Privacy

All Cases

9 Internet Privacy Cases

Doe v. DHS
California
Jan 2026

Internet Privacy

Privacy & Technology

Doe v. DHS

On February 2, 2026, the ACLU, Ƶof Northern California, and the Ƶof Pennsylvania filed a motion in federal court to quash a Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) administrative subpoena seeking Google subscriber records about our client, solely because he engaged in constitutionally protected speech criticizing DHS conduct.
Explore case
Doe V. Dhs. Explore Case.
California
Jan 2026
Doe v. DHS

Internet Privacy

Privacy & Technology

Doe v. DHS

On February 2, 2026, the ACLU, Ƶof Northern California, and the Ƶof Pennsylvania filed a motion in federal court to quash a Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) administrative subpoena seeking Google subscriber records about our client, solely because he engaged in constitutionally protected speech criticizing DHS conduct.
Doe V. Dhs. Explore Case.
NetChoice v. Fitch
Mississippi
Jul 2024

Internet Privacy

Privacy & Technology

NetChoice v. Fitch

Whether a law that mandates age verification for all users of social media services violates the First Amendment.
Explore case
Netchoice V. Fitch. Explore Case.
Mississippi
Jul 2024
NetChoice v. Fitch

Internet Privacy

Privacy & Technology

NetChoice v. Fitch

Whether a law that mandates age verification for all users of social media services violates the First Amendment.
Netchoice V. Fitch. Explore Case.
Wells v. State of Texas
Texas
Apr 2024

Internet Privacy

Wells v. State of Texas

Explore case
Wells V. State Of Texas. Explore Case.
Texas
Apr 2024
Wells v. State of Texas

Internet Privacy

Wells v. State of Texas

Wells V. State Of Texas. Explore Case.
A finger pressign a keyboard.
California
Feb 2024

Internet Privacy

Privacy & Technology

Netchoice, LLC v. Bonta

This amicus brief highlights the constitutional defects of a California law that purports to protect consumer privacy but is actually an impermissible, content-based regulation of online speech. The brief urges that this law should be struck down while emphasizing that the court should rule narrowly and leave paths open for other consumer privacy laws to withstand First Amendment challenge.
Explore case
Netchoice, Llc V. Bonta. Explore Case.
California
Feb 2024
A finger pressign a keyboard.

Internet Privacy

Privacy & Technology

Netchoice, LLC v. Bonta

This amicus brief highlights the constitutional defects of a California law that purports to protect consumer privacy but is actually an impermissible, content-based regulation of online speech. The brief urges that this law should be struck down while emphasizing that the court should rule narrowly and leave paths open for other consumer privacy laws to withstand First Amendment challenge.
Netchoice, Llc V. Bonta. Explore Case.
iPhone with "Get a Warrant - ACLU" sticker
Court Case
May 2023

Internet Privacy

National Security

The Warrant Clause in the Digital Age

The information generated by today’s digital devices and online services reveals private matters far beyond what one could learn from physical analogs. In a series of legal filings and a white paper, available below, the Ƶhas argued that to keep apace with technological developments and adequately protect our privacy, the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement must be interpreted robustly. Seizures and searches of digital data must be cabined to probable cause, limited to specific categories of information relevant to the investigation, and closely overseen by a neutral magistrate.
Explore case
The Warrant Clause In The Digital Age. Explore Case.
Court Case
May 2023
iPhone with "Get a Warrant - ACLU" sticker

Internet Privacy

National Security

The Warrant Clause in the Digital Age

The information generated by today’s digital devices and online services reveals private matters far beyond what one could learn from physical analogs. In a series of legal filings and a white paper, available below, the Ƶhas argued that to keep apace with technological developments and adequately protect our privacy, the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement must be interpreted robustly. Seizures and searches of digital data must be cabined to probable cause, limited to specific categories of information relevant to the investigation, and closely overseen by a neutral magistrate.
The Warrant Clause In The Digital Age. Explore Case.
1
2