Free Speech

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Molina v. Book

Free Speech

Molina v. Book

Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
Molina V. Book. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023
O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed

Free Speech

O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed

The ACLU, the Ƶof Northern California, and the Ƶof Southern California filed amicus briefs in support of everyday people fighting for government transparency and accountability in two cases set for review by the U.S. Supreme Court this Term: O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed.
O’connor-ratcliff V. Garnier And Lindke V. Freed. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

Free Speech

Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

On September 25, 2017, the ACLU-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
Mahanoy Area School District V. B.l.. Explore Case.

All Cases

158 Free Speech Cases

Doe v. DHS
California
Jan 2026

Free Speech

Privacy & Technology

Doe v. DHS

On February 2, 2026, the ACLU, Ƶof Northern California, and the Ƶof Pennsylvania filed a motion in federal court to quash a Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) administrative subpoena seeking Google subscriber records about our client, solely because he engaged in constitutionally protected speech criticizing DHS conduct.
Explore case
Doe V. Dhs. Explore Case.
California
Jan 2026
Doe v. DHS

Free Speech

Privacy & Technology

Doe v. DHS

On February 2, 2026, the ACLU, Ƶof Northern California, and the Ƶof Pennsylvania filed a motion in federal court to quash a Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) administrative subpoena seeking Google subscriber records about our client, solely because he engaged in constitutionally protected speech criticizing DHS conduct.
Doe V. Dhs. Explore Case.
O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina
South Carolina
Jan 2026

Free Speech

LGBTQ Rights

O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina

Local library patrons, with help from the Ƶ and Ƶof South Carolina, are suing officials in South Carolina’s most populous county for systematically purging literature by and about lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people from its public library collection.
Explore case
O.r. V. Greenville County, South Carolina. Explore Case.
South Carolina
Jan 2026
O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina

Free Speech

LGBTQ Rights

O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina

Local library patrons, with help from the Ƶ and Ƶof South Carolina, are suing officials in South Carolina’s most populous county for systematically purging literature by and about lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people from its public library collection.
O.r. V. Greenville County, South Carolina. Explore Case.
The New York Times Co. v. Department of Defense
Washington, D.C.
Jan 2026

Free Speech

The New York Times Co. v. Department of Defense

Explore case
The New York Times Co. V. Department Of Defense. Explore Case.
Washington, D.C.
Jan 2026
The New York Times Co. v. Department of Defense

Free Speech

The New York Times Co. v. Department of Defense

The New York Times Co. V. Department Of Defense. Explore Case.
Image showing the symbol of the International Criminal Court on a window at the Hague
Maine
Dec 2025

Free Speech

National Security

Smith v. Trump

On April 11, 2025, the Ƶand Ƶof Maine filed a lawsuit on behalf of two human rights advocates who, because of an executive order signed by President Trump, have been forced to stop humanitarian work with the International Criminal Court.
Explore case
Smith V. Trump. Explore Case.
Maine
Dec 2025
Image showing the symbol of the International Criminal Court on a window at the Hague

Free Speech

National Security

Smith v. Trump

On April 11, 2025, the Ƶand Ƶof Maine filed a lawsuit on behalf of two human rights advocates who, because of an executive order signed by President Trump, have been forced to stop humanitarian work with the International Criminal Court.
Smith V. Trump. Explore Case.
Parnell v. Escambia
Florida
Dec 2025

Free Speech

Parnell v. Escambia

Explore case
Parnell V. Escambia. Explore Case.
Florida
Dec 2025
Parnell v. Escambia

Free Speech

Parnell v. Escambia

Parnell V. Escambia. Explore Case.
1
23...