Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions
Rogers v. Health and Human Services
Eden Rogers and Brandy Welch were turned away by a government-funded foster care agency for failing to meet the agency鈥檚 religious criteria which exclude prospective foster parents who are not evangelical Protestant Christian or who are same-sex couples of any faith.
Status: Closed
View Case
Learn About Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions
All Cases
11 Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions Cases
Michigan
Nov 2022
Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions
Buck v. Gordon
A state-contracted, taxpayer-funded child placing agency sued the State of Michigan claiming a constitutional right to discriminate against prospective foster and adoptive families headed by same-sex couples in violation of State contracts. The ACLU, representing prospective adoptive parents Kristy and Dana Dumont, is seeking to intervene in this lawsuit in support of the State.
Explore case
Michigan
Nov 2022
Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions
Buck v. Gordon
A state-contracted, taxpayer-funded child placing agency sued the State of Michigan claiming a constitutional right to discriminate against prospective foster and adoptive families headed by same-sex couples in violation of State contracts. The ACLU, representing prospective adoptive parents Kristy and Dana Dumont, is seeking to intervene in this lawsuit in support of the State.
Court Case
Mar 2022
Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions
Catholic Charities West Michigan v. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
A second state-contracted, taxpayer-funded child placing agency sued the State of Michigan claiming a constitutional right to discriminate against prospective foster and adoptive families headed by same-sex couples in violation of State contracts. The ACLU, representing prospective adoptive parents Kristy and Dana Dumont, is seeking to intervene in this lawsuit in support of the State.
Explore case
Court Case
Mar 2022
Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions
Catholic Charities West Michigan v. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
A second state-contracted, taxpayer-funded child placing agency sued the State of Michigan claiming a constitutional right to discriminate against prospective foster and adoptive families headed by same-sex couples in violation of State contracts. The ACLU, representing prospective adoptive parents Kristy and Dana Dumont, is seeking to intervene in this lawsuit in support of the State.
Michigan
Feb 2022
Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions
Dumont v. Gordon
Attorneys for the 桃子视频and 桃子视频of Michigan filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court to challenge the state鈥檚 practice of permitting state-funded child placement agencies to use religious criteria to turn away lesbian and gay prospective foster and adoptive parents. The legislature passed a law in 2015 with the purpose of codifying that practice.
Explore case
Michigan
Feb 2022
Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions
Dumont v. Gordon
Attorneys for the 桃子视频and 桃子视频of Michigan filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court to challenge the state鈥檚 practice of permitting state-funded child placement agencies to use religious criteria to turn away lesbian and gay prospective foster and adoptive parents. The legislature passed a law in 2015 with the purpose of codifying that practice.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2021
Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
On November 4, the Supreme Court heard a case that could allow private agencies that receive taxpayer-funding to provide government services 鈥� such as foster care providers, food banks, homeless shelters, and more 鈥� to deny services to people who are LGBTQ, Jewish, Muslim, or Mormon.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2021
Discriminatory Treatment in Foster Parenting and Adoptions
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
On November 4, the Supreme Court heard a case that could allow private agencies that receive taxpayer-funding to provide government services 鈥� such as foster care providers, food banks, homeless shelters, and more 鈥� to deny services to people who are LGBTQ, Jewish, Muslim, or Mormon.