Birth Control
Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc., v. Strange
The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Alabama, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and Planned Parenthood Southeast, have filed a lawsuit challenging a state law that places onerous and medically unnecessary restrictions on abortion providers and would force most of the state鈥檚 clinics to stop providing abortions.
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View Case
Learn About Birth Control
All Cases
4 Birth Control Cases
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2016
Birth Control
Zubik v. Burwell
Whether religiously-affiliated nonprofits have a valid religious objection to a rule that allows them to opt out of the requirement to provide contraceptive care coverage for their employees under the Affordable Care Act.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2016
Birth Control
Zubik v. Burwell
Whether religiously-affiliated nonprofits have a valid religious objection to a rule that allows them to opt out of the requirement to provide contraceptive care coverage for their employees under the Affordable Care Act.
Indiana
Aug 2013
Birth Control
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., v. Commissioner, Indiana State Department of Health et al.
The 桃子视频, 桃子视频of Indiana and Planned Parenthood Federation of America have challenged amendments to state laws that single out one health care center in Lafayette, Ind. for a host of unnecessary new regulations. The lawsuit, filed in federal court on behalf of Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky against the Indiana State Department of Health and the Tippecanoe County Prosecutor, claims that these laws violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Explore case
Indiana
Aug 2013
Birth Control
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., v. Commissioner, Indiana State Department of Health et al.
The 桃子视频, 桃子视频of Indiana and Planned Parenthood Federation of America have challenged amendments to state laws that single out one health care center in Lafayette, Ind. for a host of unnecessary new regulations. The lawsuit, filed in federal court on behalf of Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky against the Indiana State Department of Health and the Tippecanoe County Prosecutor, claims that these laws violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Massachusetts
Dec 2012
Birth Control
+2 桃子视频
桃子视频of Massachusetts v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al.
From April 2006 to October 2011, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has awarded the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) $2.5 million to $4 million annually to fund organizations that provide direct services to trafficking victims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act. HHS does this knowing that USCCB prohibits, based on its religious beliefs, grantees from using any of the federal funds to provide or refer for contraceptive or abortion services.
Explore case
Massachusetts
Dec 2012
Birth Control
+2 桃子视频
桃子视频of Massachusetts v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al.
From April 2006 to October 2011, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has awarded the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) $2.5 million to $4 million annually to fund organizations that provide direct services to trafficking victims under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act. HHS does this knowing that USCCB prohibits, based on its religious beliefs, grantees from using any of the federal funds to provide or refer for contraceptive or abortion services.