Reproductive Freedom

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2024
Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States

Reproductive Freedom

Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States

Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court by Idaho politicians seeking to disregard a federal statute 鈥 the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) 鈥 and put doctors in jail for providing pregnant patients necessary emergency medical care. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this case on April 24, 2024. The Court鈥檚 ultimate decision will impact access to this essential care across the country.
Idaho And Moyle, Et Al. V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Reproductive Freedom

Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

The 桃子视频 joined over 200 reproductive health, rights, and justice organizations in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of an emergency request to stay a decision issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that severely restricted the use of mifepristone 鈥 a medication used in most abortions in this country 鈥 and threatened the innovation of new drugs and the ability of Americans to access lifesaving drugs.
Danco Laboratories, Llc, V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine; U.s. Fda V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2022
Bans Off Our Bodies Protest Sign

Reproductive Freedom

Dobbs v. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization

The case concerns the constitutionality of a Mississippi law prohibiting abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy. The state used the case as a vehicle to ask the Supreme Court to take away the federal constitutional right to abortion it first recognized 50 years before in Roe v. Wade. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States accepted the state鈥檚 invitation and overturned Roe eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion.
Dobbs V. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022
RFP attorneys Alexa Kolbi-Molinas and Andrew Beck heading towards the Supreme Court to argue the case.

Reproductive Freedom

Cameron v. EMW Women鈥檚 Surgical Center

In 2018, the 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Kentucky filed a suit on behalf of Kentucky abortion providers and their patients challenging a state law banning physicians from providing a safe and medically proven abortion method called dilation and evacuation, or 鈥淒&E.鈥 If it were to take effect, this law would prevent many patients from being able to obtain an abortion altogether. After two courts held that the law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled in March 2022 that Kentucky Attorney General Cameron can continue his pursuit to push abortion out of reach by intervening in the underlying challenge to an abortion ban, which is proceeding in a lower court.
Cameron V. Emw Women鈥檚 Surgical Center. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

Reproductive Freedom

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Texas, and coalition partners filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of abortion providers and funds on July 13, 2021, challenging S.B. 8, a Texas law allowing private citizens to enforce a ban on abortion as early as six weeks in pregnancy鈥攂efore many know they are pregnant. The ACLU鈥檚 challenge made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court three times in as many months. After hearing oral arguments in the case, the Court issued a decision on December 10, 2021, that ended the most promising pathways to blocking the ban. The Supreme Court鈥檚 decision makes it more difficult to obtain adequate relief from the courts and gives states the green light to ban abortion using bounty-hunting schemes. Texas鈥 abortion ban will remain in effect until relief can be secured from a court.
Whole Woman's Health V. Jackson. Explore Case.

All Cases

121 Reproductive Freedom Cases

Woman looking depressed
Kentucky
Aug 2022

Reproductive Freedom

EMW Women鈥檚 Surgical Center v. Friedlander: Ban on Safe Abortion Procedure

In 2018, the 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Kentucky filed suit on behalf of Kentucky abortion providers to challenge a state law banning physicians from providing a safe and medically proven abortion method called dilation and evacuation, or 鈥淒&E.鈥 If it were to take effect, this law would prevent many patients from being able to obtain an abortion altogether. The law imposes serious harm on patients' health and dignity.
Explore case
Emw Women鈥檚 Surgical Center V. Friedlander: Ban On Safe Abortion Procedure. Explore Case.
Kentucky
Aug 2022
Woman looking depressed

Reproductive Freedom

EMW Women鈥檚 Surgical Center v. Friedlander: Ban on Safe Abortion Procedure

In 2018, the 桃子视频and the 桃子视频of Kentucky filed suit on behalf of Kentucky abortion providers to challenge a state law banning physicians from providing a safe and medically proven abortion method called dilation and evacuation, or 鈥淒&E.鈥 If it were to take effect, this law would prevent many patients from being able to obtain an abortion altogether. The law imposes serious harm on patients' health and dignity.
Emw Women鈥檚 Surgical Center V. Friedlander: Ban On Safe Abortion Procedure. Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et al v. Moore et al
Court Case
Aug 2022

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et al v. Moore et al

The ACLU, the 桃子视频of North Carolina, Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the Center for Reproductive Rights filed sweeping litigation on behalf of North Carolina abortion providers and reproductive justice activists challenging several abortion restrictions in the state.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic Et Al V. Moore Et Al. Explore Case.
Court Case
Aug 2022
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et al v. Moore et al

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et al v. Moore et al

The ACLU, the 桃子视频of North Carolina, Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the Center for Reproductive Rights filed sweeping litigation on behalf of North Carolina abortion providers and reproductive justice activists challenging several abortion restrictions in the state.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic Et Al V. Moore Et Al. Explore Case.
EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Meier: Six-Week Ban and Reason Ban
Kentucky
Aug 2022

Reproductive Freedom

EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Meier: Six-Week Ban and Reason Ban

In 2019, the 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Kentucky filed a lawsuit to challenge two new Kentucky laws. One law is a ban on abortion at 6-weeks in pregnancy, and the other law would ban abortion based on the specific reasons for the person鈥檚 decision, such as a fetal diagnosis. Both laws are unconstitutional bans on abortion, and they intrude into the personal health decisions of women and families.
Explore case
Emw Women's Surgical Center V. Meier: Six-week Ban And Reason Ban. Explore Case.
Kentucky
Aug 2022
EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Meier: Six-Week Ban and Reason Ban

Reproductive Freedom

EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Meier: Six-Week Ban and Reason Ban

In 2019, the 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Kentucky filed a lawsuit to challenge two new Kentucky laws. One law is a ban on abortion at 6-weeks in pregnancy, and the other law would ban abortion based on the specific reasons for the person鈥檚 decision, such as a fetal diagnosis. Both laws are unconstitutional bans on abortion, and they intrude into the personal health decisions of women and families.
Emw Women's Surgical Center V. Meier: Six-week Ban And Reason Ban. Explore Case.
Pro-abortion protesters.
Court Case
Jul 2022

Reproductive Freedom

SisterSong v. State of Georgia

Georgia physicians, reproductive health care providers, and advocates filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of Fulton County on June 26, bringing a state constitutional challenge against H.B. 481, a law banning abortion at approximately six weeks of pregnancy 鈥 just two weeks after a person鈥檚 first missed period and before many people even know they are pregnant. This lawsuit comes one week after a federal appeals court allowed Georgia鈥檚 six-week ban to take effect for the first time since it was passed in 2019, causing an immediate, devastating crisis as clinics were forced to turn away patients in waiting rooms across the state and to cancel many upcoming appointments.
Explore case
Sistersong V. State Of Georgia. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jul 2022
Pro-abortion protesters.

Reproductive Freedom

SisterSong v. State of Georgia

Georgia physicians, reproductive health care providers, and advocates filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of Fulton County on June 26, bringing a state constitutional challenge against H.B. 481, a law banning abortion at approximately six weeks of pregnancy 鈥 just two weeks after a person鈥檚 first missed period and before many people even know they are pregnant. This lawsuit comes one week after a federal appeals court allowed Georgia鈥檚 six-week ban to take effect for the first time since it was passed in 2019, causing an immediate, devastating crisis as clinics were forced to turn away patients in waiting rooms across the state and to cancel many upcoming appointments.
Sistersong V. State Of Georgia. Explore Case.
Preterm-Cleveland v. Yost
Ohio
Jul 2022

Reproductive Freedom

Preterm-Cleveland v. Yost

The 桃子视频, 桃子视频of Ohio, and Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit in June of 2019 challenging an Ohio law banning abortion as early as six weeks into pregnancy. This law would effectively eliminate abortion access in the state. In July of 2019, we successfully obtained a preliminary injunction, blocking this law from taking effect. On July 7, 2022, following the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization reversing Roe v. Wade, the case was dismissed without prejudice.
Explore case
Preterm-cleveland V. Yost. Explore Case.
Ohio
Jul 2022
Preterm-Cleveland v. Yost

Reproductive Freedom

Preterm-Cleveland v. Yost

The 桃子视频, 桃子视频of Ohio, and Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit in June of 2019 challenging an Ohio law banning abortion as early as six weeks into pregnancy. This law would effectively eliminate abortion access in the state. In July of 2019, we successfully obtained a preliminary injunction, blocking this law from taking effect. On July 7, 2022, following the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization reversing Roe v. Wade, the case was dismissed without prejudice.
Preterm-cleveland V. Yost. Explore Case.
78
9
1011...