Abortion

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2024
Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States

Abortion

Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States

Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court by Idaho politicians seeking to disregard a federal statute 鈥 the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) 鈥 and put doctors in jail for providing pregnant patients necessary emergency medical care. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this case on April 24, 2024. The Court鈥檚 ultimate decision will impact access to this essential care across the country.
Idaho And Moyle, Et Al. V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2022
Bans Off Our Bodies Protest Sign

Abortion

Dobbs v. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization

The case concerns the constitutionality of a Mississippi law prohibiting abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy. The state used the case as a vehicle to ask the Supreme Court to take away the federal constitutional right to abortion it first recognized 50 years before in Roe v. Wade. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States accepted the state鈥檚 invitation and overturned Roe eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion.
Dobbs V. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022
RFP attorneys Alexa Kolbi-Molinas and Andrew Beck heading towards the Supreme Court to argue the case.

Abortion

Cameron v. EMW Women鈥檚 Surgical Center

In 2018, the 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Kentucky filed a suit on behalf of Kentucky abortion providers and their patients challenging a state law banning physicians from providing a safe and medically proven abortion method called dilation and evacuation, or 鈥淒&E.鈥 If it were to take effect, this law would prevent many patients from being able to obtain an abortion altogether. After two courts held that the law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled in March 2022 that Kentucky Attorney General Cameron can continue his pursuit to push abortion out of reach by intervening in the underlying challenge to an abortion ban, which is proceeding in a lower court.
Cameron V. Emw Women鈥檚 Surgical Center. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

Abortion

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Texas, and coalition partners filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of abortion providers and funds on July 13, 2021, challenging S.B. 8, a Texas law allowing private citizens to enforce a ban on abortion as early as six weeks in pregnancy鈥攂efore many know they are pregnant. The ACLU鈥檚 challenge made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court three times in as many months. After hearing oral arguments in the case, the Court issued a decision on December 10, 2021, that ended the most promising pathways to blocking the ban. The Supreme Court鈥檚 decision makes it more difficult to obtain adequate relief from the courts and gives states the green light to ban abortion using bounty-hunting schemes. Texas鈥 abortion ban will remain in effect until relief can be secured from a court.
Whole Woman's Health V. Jackson. Explore Case.

All Cases

93 Abortion Cases

Woman looking depressed
Court Case
Jun 2021

Abortion

Bryant et al. v. Woodall et al.

The 桃子视频, along with Planned Parenthood and the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a federal lawsuit that seeks to overturn North Carolina鈥檚 unconstitutional law that prevents doctors from providing abortion care to a woman after the twentieth week of pregnancy.
Explore case
Bryant Et Al. V. Woodall Et Al.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jun 2021
Woman looking depressed

Abortion

Bryant et al. v. Woodall et al.

The 桃子视频, along with Planned Parenthood and the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a federal lawsuit that seeks to overturn North Carolina鈥檚 unconstitutional law that prevents doctors from providing abortion care to a woman after the twentieth week of pregnancy.
Bryant Et Al. V. Woodall Et Al.. Explore Case.
Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., v. Larry Jegley, et al.
Arkansas
May 2021

Abortion

Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., v. Larry Jegley, et al.

The 桃子视频 (ACLU), the 桃子视频of Arkansas, and Planned Parenthood Federation filed a lawsuit challenging Arkansas鈥檚 new total ban on abortion.
Explore case
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Et Al., V. Larry Jegley, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Arkansas
May 2021
Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., v. Larry Jegley, et al.

Abortion

Little Rock Family Planning Services, et al., v. Larry Jegley, et al.

The 桃子视频 (ACLU), the 桃子视频of Arkansas, and Planned Parenthood Federation filed a lawsuit challenging Arkansas鈥檚 new total ban on abortion.
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Et Al., V. Larry Jegley, Et Al.. Explore Case.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Maryland
Feb 2021

Abortion

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

The 桃子视频 filed a federal lawsuit challenging an FDA rule that subjects patients to unnecessary risks of contracting COVID-19 as a condition of receiving a medication used for early abortion and miscarriage treatment.
Explore case
American College Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists V. U.s. Food And Drug Administration. Explore Case.
Maryland
Feb 2021
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Abortion

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

The 桃子视频 filed a federal lawsuit challenging an FDA rule that subjects patients to unnecessary risks of contracting COVID-19 as a condition of receiving a medication used for early abortion and miscarriage treatment.
American College Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists V. U.s. Food And Drug Administration. Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi et al v. Slatery et al
Court Case
Sep 2020

Abortion

Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi et al v. Slatery et al

The ACLU, the 桃子视频of Tennessee, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the Center for Reproductive Rights challenged a medically unsound 鈥渁bortion reversal鈥 law in Tennessee on behalf of abortion providers in the state: Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi, Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health, Memphis Center for Reproductive Health, and Carafem.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood Of Tennessee And North Mississippi Et Al V. Slatery Et Al. Explore Case.
Court Case
Sep 2020
Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi et al v. Slatery et al

Abortion

Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi et al v. Slatery et al

The ACLU, the 桃子视频of Tennessee, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the Center for Reproductive Rights challenged a medically unsound 鈥渁bortion reversal鈥 law in Tennessee on behalf of abortion providers in the state: Planned Parenthood of Tennessee and North Mississippi, Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health, Memphis Center for Reproductive Health, and Carafem.
Planned Parenthood Of Tennessee And North Mississippi Et Al V. Slatery Et Al. Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et. al. v. Moore et. al.
North Carolina
Sep 2020

Abortion

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et. al. v. Moore et. al.

Abortion providers in North Carolina and SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective filed litigation on September 3, 2020, challenging several medically unnecessary abortion restrictions that have pushed abortion out of reach in the state and stigmatized essential health care.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic Et. Al. V. Moore Et. Al.. Explore Case.
North Carolina
Sep 2020
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et. al. v. Moore et. al.

Abortion

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et. al. v. Moore et. al.

Abortion providers in North Carolina and SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective filed litigation on September 3, 2020, challenging several medically unnecessary abortion restrictions that have pushed abortion out of reach in the state and stigmatized essential health care.
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic Et. Al. V. Moore Et. Al.. Explore Case.
78
9
1011...