Reproductive Freedom

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2024
Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States

Reproductive Freedom

Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States

Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court by Idaho politicians seeking to disregard a federal statute 鈥 the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) 鈥 and put doctors in jail for providing pregnant patients necessary emergency medical care. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this case on April 24, 2024. The Court鈥檚 ultimate decision will impact access to this essential care across the country.
Idaho And Moyle, Et Al. V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Reproductive Freedom

Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

The 桃子视频 joined over 200 reproductive health, rights, and justice organizations in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of an emergency request to stay a decision issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that severely restricted the use of mifepristone 鈥 a medication used in most abortions in this country 鈥 and threatened the innovation of new drugs and the ability of Americans to access lifesaving drugs.
Danco Laboratories, Llc, V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine; U.s. Fda V. Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2022
Bans Off Our Bodies Protest Sign

Reproductive Freedom

Dobbs v. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization

The case concerns the constitutionality of a Mississippi law prohibiting abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy. The state used the case as a vehicle to ask the Supreme Court to take away the federal constitutional right to abortion it first recognized 50 years before in Roe v. Wade. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States accepted the state鈥檚 invitation and overturned Roe eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion.
Dobbs V. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022
RFP attorneys Alexa Kolbi-Molinas and Andrew Beck heading towards the Supreme Court to argue the case.

Reproductive Freedom

Cameron v. EMW Women鈥檚 Surgical Center

In 2018, the 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Kentucky filed a suit on behalf of Kentucky abortion providers and their patients challenging a state law banning physicians from providing a safe and medically proven abortion method called dilation and evacuation, or 鈥淒&E.鈥 If it were to take effect, this law would prevent many patients from being able to obtain an abortion altogether. After two courts held that the law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled in March 2022 that Kentucky Attorney General Cameron can continue his pursuit to push abortion out of reach by intervening in the underlying challenge to an abortion ban, which is proceeding in a lower court.
Cameron V. Emw Women鈥檚 Surgical Center. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

Reproductive Freedom

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

The 桃子视频, the 桃子视频of Texas, and coalition partners filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of abortion providers and funds on July 13, 2021, challenging S.B. 8, a Texas law allowing private citizens to enforce a ban on abortion as early as six weeks in pregnancy鈥攂efore many know they are pregnant. The ACLU鈥檚 challenge made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court three times in as many months. After hearing oral arguments in the case, the Court issued a decision on December 10, 2021, that ended the most promising pathways to blocking the ban. The Supreme Court鈥檚 decision makes it more difficult to obtain adequate relief from the courts and gives states the green light to ban abortion using bounty-hunting schemes. Texas鈥 abortion ban will remain in effect until relief can be secured from a court.
Whole Woman's Health V. Jackson. Explore Case.

All Cases

121 Reproductive Freedom Cases

"Abortion Access" and "I heart Repro Rights" signs in front of Supreme Court
Arkansas
Sep 2022

Reproductive Freedom

Hopkins v. Jegley 鈥 Challenge to Arkansas Law Restricting Abortion Rights

On July 28, 2017, the U.S. District Court granted plaintiff鈥檚 motion for preliminary injunction, thereby blocking enforcement of four challenged Arkansas laws restricting abortion care in the state until the litigation is resolved.
Explore case
Hopkins V. Jegley 鈥 Challenge To Arkansas Law Restricting Abortion Rights. Explore Case.
Arkansas
Sep 2022
"Abortion Access" and "I heart Repro Rights" signs in front of Supreme Court

Reproductive Freedom

Hopkins v. Jegley 鈥 Challenge to Arkansas Law Restricting Abortion Rights

On July 28, 2017, the U.S. District Court granted plaintiff鈥檚 motion for preliminary injunction, thereby blocking enforcement of four challenged Arkansas laws restricting abortion care in the state until the litigation is resolved.
Hopkins V. Jegley 鈥 Challenge To Arkansas Law Restricting Abortion Rights. Explore Case.
State Ex Rel. Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Dave Yost, et al.
Court Case
Sep 2022

Reproductive Freedom

State Ex Rel. Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Dave Yost, et al.

Hours after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on June 24th, 2022, ending the federal constitutional right to abortion and reversing nearly 50 years of precedent, a federal judge in Ohio granted the state鈥檚 request to allow the previously blocked six-week abortion ban, Senate Bill 23, to take effect. On June 29th, 2022, abortion providers in Ohio filed a lawsuit seeking to block this six-week ban with the state supreme court.
Explore case
State Ex Rel. Preterm-cleveland, Et Al. V. Dave Yost, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Sep 2022
State Ex Rel. Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Dave Yost, et al.

Reproductive Freedom

State Ex Rel. Preterm-Cleveland, et al. v. Dave Yost, et al.

Hours after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on June 24th, 2022, ending the federal constitutional right to abortion and reversing nearly 50 years of precedent, a federal judge in Ohio granted the state鈥檚 request to allow the previously blocked six-week abortion ban, Senate Bill 23, to take effect. On June 29th, 2022, abortion providers in Ohio filed a lawsuit seeking to block this six-week ban with the state supreme court.
State Ex Rel. Preterm-cleveland, Et Al. V. Dave Yost, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Memphis Center for Reproductive Health, et al., v. Herbert Slatery, et al.
Court Case
Sep 2022

Reproductive Freedom

Memphis Center for Reproductive Health, et al., v. Herbert Slatery, et al.

The lawsuit challenges several abortion restrictions passed in Tennessee, including: a series of gestational age bans that would ban abortion at nearly every stage of pregnancy, starting as early as six weeks; and a ban on abortion based on a patient鈥檚 reason for seeking abortion, including reasons related to race, sex, or a fetal diagnosis of Down syndrome.
Explore case
Memphis Center For Reproductive Health, Et Al., V. Herbert Slatery, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Sep 2022
Memphis Center for Reproductive Health, et al., v. Herbert Slatery, et al.

Reproductive Freedom

Memphis Center for Reproductive Health, et al., v. Herbert Slatery, et al.

The lawsuit challenges several abortion restrictions passed in Tennessee, including: a series of gestational age bans that would ban abortion at nearly every stage of pregnancy, starting as early as six weeks; and a ban on abortion based on a patient鈥檚 reason for seeking abortion, including reasons related to race, sex, or a fetal diagnosis of Down syndrome.
Memphis Center For Reproductive Health, Et Al., V. Herbert Slatery, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Planned Parenthood Great NW, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, & Kentucky, Inc. v. Daniel Cameron, et al.
Court Case
Aug 2022

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood Great NW, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, & Kentucky, Inc. v. Daniel Cameron, et al.

On April 13, 2022, the Kentucky Legislature overrode Gov. Andy Beshear鈥檚 veto and passed H.B.3, an anti-abortion omnibus law with an immediate effective date designed to effectively ban abortion in the state.
Explore case
Planned Parenthood Great Nw, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, & Kentucky, Inc. V. Daniel Cameron, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Aug 2022
Planned Parenthood Great NW, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, & Kentucky, Inc. v. Daniel Cameron, et al.

Reproductive Freedom

Planned Parenthood Great NW, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, & Kentucky, Inc. v. Daniel Cameron, et al.

On April 13, 2022, the Kentucky Legislature overrode Gov. Andy Beshear鈥檚 veto and passed H.B.3, an anti-abortion omnibus law with an immediate effective date designed to effectively ban abortion in the state.
Planned Parenthood Great Nw, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, & Kentucky, Inc. V. Daniel Cameron, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Women鈥檚 Health Center of West Virginia, et al. v. Charles Miller, et al.
West Virginia
Aug 2022

Reproductive Freedom

Women鈥檚 Health Center of West Virginia, et al. v. Charles Miller, et al.

Following the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade 鈥 the landmark decision that acknowledged the right to an abortion to millions of Americans for nearly five decades 鈥 West Virginia medical providers and advocates filed a lawsuit on June 29, 2022 to prevent the enforcement of an archaic and cruel abortion ban in state court.
Explore case
Women鈥檚 Health Center Of West Virginia, Et Al. V. Charles Miller, Et Al.. Explore Case.
West Virginia
Aug 2022
Women鈥檚 Health Center of West Virginia, et al. v. Charles Miller, et al.

Reproductive Freedom

Women鈥檚 Health Center of West Virginia, et al. v. Charles Miller, et al.

Following the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade 鈥 the landmark decision that acknowledged the right to an abortion to millions of Americans for nearly five decades 鈥 West Virginia medical providers and advocates filed a lawsuit on June 29, 2022 to prevent the enforcement of an archaic and cruel abortion ban in state court.
Women鈥檚 Health Center Of West Virginia, Et Al. V. Charles Miller, Et Al.. Explore Case.
67
8
910...