Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2021
Border Asylum Line

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Gender & Refugee Studies filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s new policy forcing asylum seekers to return to Mexico and remain there while their cases are considered.
Innovation Law Lab V. Wolf. Explore Case.

All Cases

41 Immigrants' Rights and Detention Cases

Flores-Villar v. United States
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Flores-Villar v. United States

Whether the government may constitutionally make it more difficult for citizen fathers than citizen mothers to transmit citizenship to their out-of-wedlock children born outside the U.S.
Explore case
Flores-villar V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011
Flores-Villar v. United States

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Flores-Villar v. United States

Whether the government may constitutionally make it more difficult for citizen fathers than citizen mothers to transmit citizenship to their out-of-wedlock children born outside the U.S.
Flores-villar V. United States. Explore Case.
Alli et al v. Decker
Pennsylvania
Mar 2010

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Immigrants' Rights

Alli et al v. Decker

Explore case
Alli Et Al V. Decker. Explore Case.
Pennsylvania
Mar 2010
Alli et al v. Decker

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Immigrants' Rights

Alli et al v. Decker

Alli Et Al V. Decker. Explore Case.
Scarlett v. DHS, et al.
New York
Jul 2009

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Immigrants' Rights

Scarlett v. DHS, et al.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York ruled on July 10 that a long-term legal resident will have a hearing within 60 days to determine whether his immigration detention is justified while he fights his removal proceedings.
Explore case
Scarlett V. Dhs, Et Al.. Explore Case.
New York
Jul 2009
Scarlett v. DHS, et al.

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Immigrants' Rights

Scarlett v. DHS, et al.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York ruled on July 10 that a long-term legal resident will have a hearing within 60 days to determine whether his immigration detention is justified while he fights his removal proceedings.
Scarlett V. Dhs, Et Al.. Explore Case.
Cases Challenging Indefinite Detention of Immigrants
Court Case
Jan 2008

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Immigrants' Rights

Cases Challenging Indefinite Detention of Immigrants

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµis challenging the incarceration of immigrants in detention centers for prolonged and indefinite periods of time while they fight their immigration cases.
Explore case
Cases Challenging Indefinite Detention Of Immigrants. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jan 2008
Cases Challenging Indefinite Detention of Immigrants

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Immigrants' Rights

Cases Challenging Indefinite Detention of Immigrants

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµis challenging the incarceration of immigrants in detention centers for prolonged and indefinite periods of time while they fight their immigration cases.
Cases Challenging Indefinite Detention Of Immigrants. Explore Case.
Benitez v. Mata
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2005

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Benitez v. Mata

Reviewing the government's claim that "Mariel" Cubans can be subject to indefinite detention if they have been found excludable from the United States and Cuba will not allow their return. DECIDED
Explore case
Benitez V. Mata. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2005
Benitez v. Mata

Immigrants' Rights and Detention

+2 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

Benitez v. Mata

Reviewing the government's claim that "Mariel" Cubans can be subject to indefinite detention if they have been found excludable from the United States and Cuba will not allow their return. DECIDED
Benitez V. Mata. Explore Case.
67
8
9