Featured

Missouri
Feb 2026
A briefcase of a Census taker.

Voting Rights

Missouri v. U.S. Department of Commerce

A coalition of civil rights and immigrant-rights organizations has moved to intervene as defendants in a lawsuit that threatens to dismantle the Constitution鈥檚 long-standing requirement that the decennial census count all people living in the United States. Missouri asks the court to exclude undocumented immigrants and people living in the country on temporary visas from the census count used to determine congressional representation鈥攁n unprecedented move that would upend more than two centuries of constitutional practice.
Missouri V. U.s. Department Of Commerce. Explore Case.
Mississippi
Dec 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

White v. Mississippi State Board of Elections

District lines used to elect Mississippi鈥檚 Supreme Court have gone unchanged for more than 35 years. We鈥檙e suing because the current lines crack the Mississippi Delta and dilute the voting strength of Black Mississippians in state Supreme Court elections, in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
White V. Mississippi State Board Of Elections. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2025
FOIA Case Seeking the Trump Administration鈥檚 Legal Justification for Deadly Boat Strikes

National Security

Human Rights

FOIA Case Seeking the Trump Administration鈥檚 Legal Justification for Deadly Boat Strikes

The Department of Justice鈥檚 Office of Legal Counsel (鈥淥LC鈥) authored a legal opinion that reportedly claims to justify the Trump administration鈥檚 illegal lethal strikes on civilians in boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean. Media reports indicate that, in addition to claiming that the strikes are lawful acts in an alleged 鈥渁rmed conflict鈥 with unspecified drug cartels, the OLC opinion also purports to immunize personnel who authorized or took part in the strikes from future criminal prosecution. Because the public deserves to know how our government is justifying these illegal strikes, and why they think the people who carried them out should not be held accountable, the 桃子视频is seeking immediate release of the OLC legal opinion and related documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.
Foia Case Seeking The Trump Administration鈥檚 Legal Justification For Deadly Boat Strikes. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2025
A collage image featuring an image of the Supreme Court and an image of a young girl waving an American flag.

Immigrants' Rights

Barbara v. Donald J. Trump

President Trump is attempting to undermine the promise of birthright citizenship to children born on U.S. soil. But the 桃子视频and partners are fighting to protect the rights of citizens that are plainly stated in the Constitution, federal statute, and reaffirmed by the Supreme Court for more than a century. We鈥檙e arguing against the Trump administration in the Supreme Court and are confident we will win.
Barbara V. Donald J. Trump. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025
Alabama on a map of the United States of America

Voting Rights

Racial Justice

Allen v. Milligan

Whether Alabama鈥檚 congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade. In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
Allen V. Milligan. Explore Case.
Washington, D.C.
Oct 2025
trump

Voting Rights

League of Women Voters Education Fund v. Trump

On March 25, 2025, in a sweeping and unprecedented Executive Order, President Trump attempted to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress and the States. Among other things, the Executive Order directs the Election Assistance Commission鈥攁n agency that Congress specifically established to be bipartisan and independent鈥攖o require voters to show a passport or other citizenship documentation in order to register to vote in federal elections. If implemented, the Executive Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible Americans to register and vote and upend the administration of federal elections. On behalf of leading voter registration organizations and advocacy organizations, the 桃子视频and co-counsel filed a lawsuit to block the Executive Order as an unconstitutional power grab.
League Of Women Voters Education Fund V. Trump. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

State Board of Election Commissioners v. Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP

Mississippi has a growing Black population, which is already the largest Black population percentage of any state in the country. Yet. Black Mississippians continue to be significantly under-represented in the state legislature, as Mississippi鈥檚 latest districting maps fail to reflect the reality of the state鈥檚 changing demographics. During the 2022 redistricting process, the Mississippi legislature refused to create any new districts where Black voters have a chance to elect their preferred representative. The current district lines therefore dilute the voting power of Black Mississippians and continue to deprive them of political representation that is responsive to their needs and concerns, including severe disparities in education and healthcare.
State Board Of Election Commissioners V. Mississippi State Conference Of The Naacp. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Louisiana

Voting Rights

Louisiana v. Callais (Callais v. Landry)

Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
Louisiana V. Callais (callais V. Landry). Explore Case.
Missouri
Sep 2025
A close up of an "I Voted" sticker.

Voting Rights

Wise v. Missouri

In unprecedented fashion, the State of Missouri has redrawn the district lines used for electing members of Congress for a second time this decade. These new district lines are gerrymandered and will harm political representation for all Missourians, particularly Black residents in Kansas City, who have been divided along racial lines.
Wise V. Missouri. Explore Case.

All Cases

1,681 Court Cases

Rosas v. Luna
California
May 2023

Prisoners' Rights

Smart Justice

Rosas v. Luna

Rosas v. Luna is a class action lawsuit brought by the 桃子视频of Southern California (桃子视频SoCal), the ACLU鈥檚 National Prison Project (NPP), and the law firm of Paul Hastings LLP in 2012 against the Los Angeles Sheriff鈥檚 Department (LASD) over its routine, excessive, and unnecessary use of force against incarcerated people in the Los Angeles Jail system.
Explore case
Rosas V. Luna. Explore Case.
California
May 2023
Rosas v. Luna

Prisoners' Rights

Smart Justice

Rosas v. Luna

Rosas v. Luna is a class action lawsuit brought by the 桃子视频of Southern California (桃子视频SoCal), the ACLU鈥檚 National Prison Project (NPP), and the law firm of Paul Hastings LLP in 2012 against the Los Angeles Sheriff鈥檚 Department (LASD) over its routine, excessive, and unnecessary use of force against incarcerated people in the Los Angeles Jail system.
Rosas V. Luna. Explore Case.
Professor Xi
Court Case
May 2023

National Security

Xi v. United States 鈥 Challenge to Warrantless Surveillance

The 桃子视频represents Xiaoxing Xi, a Chinese-American physics professor at Temple University, who is suing the government over its dismissed prosecution of him for supposedly sharing sensitive technology with scientists in China. The lawsuit, filed in 2017, challenges the FBI鈥檚 baseless arrest of Xi and it surveillance methods as well as its discriminatory targeting of Chinese-American scientists.
Explore case
Xi V. United States 鈥 Challenge To Warrantless Surveillance. Explore Case.
Court Case
May 2023
Professor Xi

National Security

Xi v. United States 鈥 Challenge to Warrantless Surveillance

The 桃子视频represents Xiaoxing Xi, a Chinese-American physics professor at Temple University, who is suing the government over its dismissed prosecution of him for supposedly sharing sensitive technology with scientists in China. The lawsuit, filed in 2017, challenges the FBI鈥檚 baseless arrest of Xi and it surveillance methods as well as its discriminatory targeting of Chinese-American scientists.
Xi V. United States 鈥 Challenge To Warrantless Surveillance. Explore Case.
Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2023

Privacy & Technology

Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service

This case concerns the scope of the IRS鈥檚 obligation under a federal law to provide notice to individuals that it is seeking their records from a third party, such as a bank, accountant, or lawyer.
Explore case
Polselli V. Internal Revenue Service. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2023
Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service

Privacy & Technology

Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service

This case concerns the scope of the IRS鈥檚 obligation under a federal law to provide notice to individuals that it is seeking their records from a third party, such as a bank, accountant, or lawyer.
Polselli V. Internal Revenue Service. Explore Case.
Using Laptop
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2023

Privacy & Technology

Free Speech

Google v. Gonzalez LLC

The Supreme Court will decide whether social media and other platforms are liable for their users鈥 posts if they make recommendations or suggestions about what content to access, or whether Section 230 affords them immunity from such claims.
Explore case
Google V. Gonzalez Llc. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2023
Using Laptop

Privacy & Technology

Free Speech

Google v. Gonzalez LLC

The Supreme Court will decide whether social media and other platforms are liable for their users鈥 posts if they make recommendations or suggestions about what content to access, or whether Section 230 affords them immunity from such claims.
Google V. Gonzalez Llc. Explore Case.
Hersom v. Crouch
West Virginia
May 2023

LGBTQ Rights

Hersom v. Crouch

Xavier Hersom applied for and was denied a gender marker change on his birth certificate. He said DHHR鈥檚 policy has created yet another layer of difficulty for him as a transgender person living in West Virginia. The ACLU, the 桃子视频of West Virginia, and the Harvard Law School LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic filed a federal lawsuit asking a court to declare West Virginia鈥檚 birth certificate policies relating to transgender people unconstitutional on behalf of Hersom and an another anonymous plaintiff.
Explore case
Hersom V. Crouch. Explore Case.
West Virginia
May 2023
Hersom v. Crouch

LGBTQ Rights

Hersom v. Crouch

Xavier Hersom applied for and was denied a gender marker change on his birth certificate. He said DHHR鈥檚 policy has created yet another layer of difficulty for him as a transgender person living in West Virginia. The ACLU, the 桃子视频of West Virginia, and the Harvard Law School LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic filed a federal lawsuit asking a court to declare West Virginia鈥檚 birth certificate policies relating to transgender people unconstitutional on behalf of Hersom and an another anonymous plaintiff.
Hersom V. Crouch. Explore Case.
8283
84
8586...