LGBTQ Rights

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020
Aimee Stephens in front of the Supreme Court

LGBTQ Rights

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC & Aimee Stephens

Aimee Stephens had worked for nearly six years as a funeral director at R.G. and G.R. Harris Funeral Homes when she informed the funeral home’s owner that she is a transgender woman. She was fired, the EEOC sued on her behalf, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Aimee’s employer engaged in unlawful sex discrimination when it fired her because she’s transgender. We represented Aimee Stephens in front of the U.S. Supreme Court — and won.
R.g. & G.r. Harris Funeral Homes V Eeoc & Aimee Stephens. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
Don Zarda, Melissa Zarda, Bill Moore

LGBTQ Rights

Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda

Don Zarda loved to skydive. He worked as a skydiving instructor at Altitude Express, a company on Long Island, N.Y. He was fired for being gay.
Altitude Express Inc. V. Zarda. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
David Mullins and Charlie Craig

LGBTQ Rights

Religious Liberty

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Jim Obergefell

LGBTQ Rights

Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Freedom to Marry in Ohio

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Ohio and Alphonse Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch have filed suit on behalf of Jim Obergefell and David Michener, two widowers, and Robert Grunn, a funeral director, in a challenge to the Ohio constitutional and statutory marriage recognition bans.
Obergefell, Et Al. V. Hodges - Freedom To Marry In Ohio. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Bourke Family

LGBTQ Rights

Bourke v. Beshear & Love v. Beshear - Freedom to Marry in Kentucky

Bourke v. Beshear is a federal court challenge to Kentucky's constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples, filed by attorneys at Clay Daniel Walton & Adams and Fauver Law Office on July 26, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are four same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their out-of-state marriages.
Bourke V. Beshear & Love V. Beshear - Freedom To Marry In Kentucky. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 LGBTQ Rights Cases

Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton

Whether a content-based regulation that burdens adults’ access to protected speech has to be merely reasonable to satisfy the First Amendment because it was passed in the name of protecting children from sexual material online.
Explore case
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. V. Paxton. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton

Whether a content-based regulation that burdens adults’ access to protected speech has to be merely reasonable to satisfy the First Amendment because it was passed in the name of protecting children from sexual material online.
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. V. Paxton. Explore Case.
LGBT flag
Florida
May 2025

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

HM Florida-ORL, LLC v. Griffin

On January 24, 2024, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Florida filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit supporting HM Florida-ORL, which operates the restaurant and bar Hamburger Mary’s in Orlando, in its lawsuit alleging that a Florida law infringes upon minors’ First Amendment rights by prohibiting them from attending drag performances.
Explore case
Hm Florida-orl, Llc V. Griffin. Explore Case.
Florida
May 2025
LGBT flag

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

HM Florida-ORL, LLC v. Griffin

On January 24, 2024, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Florida filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit supporting HM Florida-ORL, which operates the restaurant and bar Hamburger Mary’s in Orlando, in its lawsuit alleging that a Florida law infringes upon minors’ First Amendment rights by prohibiting them from attending drag performances.
Hm Florida-orl, Llc V. Griffin. Explore Case.
E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity
Virginia
Apr 2025

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity

Whether the Department of Defense Education Activity can remove educational material related to race and gender from its libraries and classrooms in K-12 schools.
Explore case
E.k. V. Department Of Defense Education Activity. Explore Case.
Virginia
Apr 2025
E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity

Whether the Department of Defense Education Activity can remove educational material related to race and gender from its libraries and classrooms in K-12 schools.
E.k. V. Department Of Defense Education Activity. Explore Case.
Perkins et al. v. State (HB 121)
Montana
Apr 2025

LGBTQ Rights

Civil Liberties

Perkins et al. v. State (HB 121)

A newly enacted Montana law, HB 121, bars transgender and intersex people from using restrooms and other sex-separated facilities that correspond to their gender identity in public spaces. In doing so, HB 121 seeks to undermine transgender and intersex people’s personhood and ability to participate in public life. Together with the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Montana and Legal Voice, the ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative filed this lawsuit on behalf of a group of transgender and intersex Montanans challenging HB 121 as violating numerous provisions of the Montana Constitution.
Explore case
Perkins Et Al. V. State (hb 121). Explore Case.
Montana
Apr 2025
Perkins et al. v. State (HB 121)

LGBTQ Rights

Civil Liberties

Perkins et al. v. State (HB 121)

A newly enacted Montana law, HB 121, bars transgender and intersex people from using restrooms and other sex-separated facilities that correspond to their gender identity in public spaces. In doing so, HB 121 seeks to undermine transgender and intersex people’s personhood and ability to participate in public life. Together with the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Montana and Legal Voice, the ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative filed this lawsuit on behalf of a group of transgender and intersex Montanans challenging HB 121 as violating numerous provisions of the Montana Constitution.
Perkins Et Al. V. State (hb 121). Explore Case.
Loe v. Texas
Texas
Mar 2025

LGBTQ Rights

Loe v. Texas

In the spring of 2023, Texas became the largest state in the country to ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth after Governor Greg Abbott signed SB 14. In July 2023, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of five Texas families, three medical professionals, and two organizations representing hundreds of families and health professionals across the state. The five Texas families challenging this law come from diverse backgrounds across the state with transgender children and teenagers. The bill’s passage alone resulted in families splitting up or planning to leave Texas to continue treatment for their children. The families are suing pseudonymously to protect themselves and their children, who are transgender Texans between the ages of 9 and 16.
Explore case
Loe V. Texas. Explore Case.
Texas
Mar 2025
Loe v. Texas

LGBTQ Rights

Loe v. Texas

In the spring of 2023, Texas became the largest state in the country to ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth after Governor Greg Abbott signed SB 14. In July 2023, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of five Texas families, three medical professionals, and two organizations representing hundreds of families and health professionals across the state. The five Texas families challenging this law come from diverse backgrounds across the state with transgender children and teenagers. The bill’s passage alone resulted in families splitting up or planning to leave Texas to continue treatment for their children. The families are suing pseudonymously to protect themselves and their children, who are transgender Texans between the ages of 9 and 16.
Loe V. Texas. Explore Case.
56
7
89...