ICE and Border Patrol Abuses

All Cases

36 ICE and Border Patrol Abuses Cases

Gonzalez v. ICE
California
Sep 2014

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses

Gonzalez v. ICE

Gonzalez v. ICE is a proposed class action lawsuit against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), brought by two U.S. citizens—Gerardo Gonzalez and Simon Chinivizyan—who were subjected to ICE detainers while in custody in Los Angeles County. The lawsuit challenges ICE's practice of lodging detainers—and thereby causing people's extended detention—without a probable cause determination, in violation of the Fourth Amendment. 
Explore case
Gonzalez V. Ice. Explore Case.
California
Sep 2014
Gonzalez v. ICE

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses

Gonzalez v. ICE

Gonzalez v. ICE is a proposed class action lawsuit against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), brought by two U.S. citizens—Gerardo Gonzalez and Simon Chinivizyan—who were subjected to ICE detainers while in custody in Los Angeles County. The lawsuit challenges ICE's practice of lodging detainers—and thereby causing people's extended detention—without a probable cause determination, in violation of the Fourth Amendment. 
Gonzalez V. Ice. Explore Case.
Lopez-Venegas v. Johnson
California
Aug 2014

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses

Lopez-Venegas v. Johnson

In June 2013, a class action lawsuit was filed by the Ƶon behalf of nine Mexican nationals and three immigrant advocacy organizations who challenged deceptive tactics used by Border Patrol agents and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to convince the plaintiffs to sign their own expulsion orders. All of the plaintiffs would have had strong claims to remain in the United States had they gone before an immigration judge instead of being pressured to choose voluntary departure, one of the many ways that the government can swiftly expel someone from the country without a hearing.
Explore case
Lopez-venegas V. Johnson. Explore Case.
California
Aug 2014
Lopez-Venegas v. Johnson

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses

Lopez-Venegas v. Johnson

In June 2013, a class action lawsuit was filed by the Ƶon behalf of nine Mexican nationals and three immigrant advocacy organizations who challenged deceptive tactics used by Border Patrol agents and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers to convince the plaintiffs to sign their own expulsion orders. All of the plaintiffs would have had strong claims to remain in the United States had they gone before an immigration judge instead of being pressured to choose voluntary departure, one of the many ways that the government can swiftly expel someone from the country without a hearing.
Lopez-venegas V. Johnson. Explore Case.
Galarza v. Szalczyk
Court Case
Jun 2014

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses

Galarza v. Szalczyk

In December 2010, the Ƶof Pennsylvania and the ƵImmigrants’ Rights Project filed suit in an Allentown, PA federal court on behalf of Ernesto Galarza, a New Jersey-born U.S. citizen of Puerto Rican descent who was held illegally for three days in the Lehigh County Prison. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents requested his detention on the baseless assertion that he might be an undocumented immigrant from the Dominican Republic. 
Explore case
Galarza V. Szalczyk. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jun 2014
Galarza v. Szalczyk

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses

Galarza v. Szalczyk

In December 2010, the Ƶof Pennsylvania and the ƵImmigrants’ Rights Project filed suit in an Allentown, PA federal court on behalf of Ernesto Galarza, a New Jersey-born U.S. citizen of Puerto Rican descent who was held illegally for three days in the Lehigh County Prison. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents requested his detention on the baseless assertion that he might be an undocumented immigrant from the Dominican Republic. 
Galarza V. Szalczyk. Explore Case.
Utah Coalition of La Raza v. Herbert
Utah
Jun 2014

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses

Utah Coalition of La Raza v. Herbert

Utah was one of five states to pass anti-immigrant laws in 2011. The Utah state legislature approved HB 497 in March, 2011 which, among other provisions, authorized local law enforcement officers to verify the immigration status of individuals they stop, made it a crime to transport or harbor undocumented immigrants, and allowed for the warrantless arrest of individuals an officer has reasonable cause to believe are subject to federal immigration deportation orders.
Explore case
Utah Coalition Of La Raza V. Herbert. Explore Case.
Utah
Jun 2014
Utah Coalition of La Raza v. Herbert

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses

Utah Coalition of La Raza v. Herbert

Utah was one of five states to pass anti-immigrant laws in 2011. The Utah state legislature approved HB 497 in March, 2011 which, among other provisions, authorized local law enforcement officers to verify the immigration status of individuals they stop, made it a crime to transport or harbor undocumented immigrants, and allowed for the warrantless arrest of individuals an officer has reasonable cause to believe are subject to federal immigration deportation orders.
Utah Coalition Of La Raza V. Herbert. Explore Case.
45
6
78