LGBTQ Rights

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020
Aimee Stephens in front of the Supreme Court

LGBTQ Rights

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC & Aimee Stephens

Aimee Stephens had worked for nearly six years as a funeral director at R.G. and G.R. Harris Funeral Homes when she informed the funeral home’s owner that she is a transgender woman. She was fired, the EEOC sued on her behalf, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Aimee’s employer engaged in unlawful sex discrimination when it fired her because she’s transgender. We represented Aimee Stephens in front of the U.S. Supreme Court — and won.
R.g. & G.r. Harris Funeral Homes V Eeoc & Aimee Stephens. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
Don Zarda, Melissa Zarda, Bill Moore

LGBTQ Rights

Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda

Don Zarda loved to skydive. He worked as a skydiving instructor at Altitude Express, a company on Long Island, N.Y. He was fired for being gay.
Altitude Express Inc. V. Zarda. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
David Mullins and Charlie Craig

LGBTQ Rights

Religious Liberty

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Jim Obergefell

LGBTQ Rights

Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Freedom to Marry in Ohio

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Ohio and Alphonse Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch have filed suit on behalf of Jim Obergefell and David Michener, two widowers, and Robert Grunn, a funeral director, in a challenge to the Ohio constitutional and statutory marriage recognition bans.
Obergefell, Et Al. V. Hodges - Freedom To Marry In Ohio. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Bourke Family

LGBTQ Rights

Bourke v. Beshear & Love v. Beshear - Freedom to Marry in Kentucky

Bourke v. Beshear is a federal court challenge to Kentucky's constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples, filed by attorneys at Clay Daniel Walton & Adams and Fauver Law Office on July 26, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are four same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their out-of-state marriages.
Bourke V. Beshear & Love V. Beshear - Freedom To Marry In Kentucky. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 LGBTQ Rights Cases

O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina
South Carolina
Jan 2026

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina

Local library patrons, with help from the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof South Carolina, are suing officials in South Carolina’s most populous county for systematically purging literature by and about lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people from its public library collection.
Explore case
O.r. V. Greenville County, South Carolina. Explore Case.
South Carolina
Jan 2026
O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

O.R. v. Greenville County, South Carolina

Local library patrons, with help from the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof South Carolina, are suing officials in South Carolina’s most populous county for systematically purging literature by and about lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people from its public library collection.
O.r. V. Greenville County, South Carolina. Explore Case.
Cross v. State of Montana
Montana
Jan 2026

LGBTQ Rights

Cross v. State of Montana

Transgender adolescents, their parents, and two medical providers who work with transgender youth are challenging a 2023 Montana law that bans gender-affirming care for trans youth. The plaintiffs charge the law with violating their rights under the Montana Constitution, including the right to equal protection, the right to access medical care, and the right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children.
Explore case
Cross V. State Of Montana. Explore Case.
Montana
Jan 2026
Cross v. State of Montana

LGBTQ Rights

Cross v. State of Montana

Transgender adolescents, their parents, and two medical providers who work with transgender youth are challenging a 2023 Montana law that bans gender-affirming care for trans youth. The plaintiffs charge the law with violating their rights under the Montana Constitution, including the right to equal protection, the right to access medical care, and the right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children.
Cross V. State Of Montana. Explore Case.
Little v. Hecox
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2026

LGBTQ Rights

Little v. Hecox

Lindsay is a college student at Boise State University. She wants to run on the track team so she can form friendships with other girls. A new law in Idaho would ban her from doing so because she is transgender.
Explore case
Little V. Hecox. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2026
Little v. Hecox

LGBTQ Rights

Little v. Hecox

Lindsay is a college student at Boise State University. She wants to run on the track team so she can form friendships with other girls. A new law in Idaho would ban her from doing so because she is transgender.
Little V. Hecox. Explore Case.
Gaines v. NCAA
Georgia
Jan 2026

LGBTQ Rights

Gaines v. NCAA

The National Women’s Law Center is intervening in defense of transgender athletes in a lawsuit brought against the National Collegiate Athletics Association attempting to force the organization to implement a nationwide and categorical ban on the participation of transgender college athletes. Founded in 1972, NWLC fights for gender justice working across the issues that are central to the lives of women and girls.
Explore case
Gaines V. Ncaa. Explore Case.
Georgia
Jan 2026
Gaines v. NCAA

LGBTQ Rights

Gaines v. NCAA

The National Women’s Law Center is intervening in defense of transgender athletes in a lawsuit brought against the National Collegiate Athletics Association attempting to force the organization to implement a nationwide and categorical ban on the participation of transgender college athletes. Founded in 1972, NWLC fights for gender justice working across the issues that are central to the lives of women and girls.
Gaines V. Ncaa. Explore Case.
Dylan, a white boy in a black tshirt with blonde hair, and his mom, Joanna, a white women with gray hair and a pink tshirt sitting on a poarch with a peach-painted wood and green stained glass windows.
Arkansas
Dec 2025

LGBTQ Rights

Brandt et al v. Rutledge et al

Four families of transgender youth and two doctors have challenged an Arkansas law that would prohibit healthcare professionals from providing or even referring transgender young people for medically necessary health care. The law would also bar any state funds or insurance coverage for gender-affirming health care for transgender people under 18, and it would allow private insurers to refuse to cover gender-affirming care for people of any age. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges that House Bill 1570 is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Explore case
Brandt Et Al V. Rutledge Et Al. Explore Case.
Arkansas
Dec 2025
Dylan, a white boy in a black tshirt with blonde hair, and his mom, Joanna, a white women with gray hair and a pink tshirt sitting on a poarch with a peach-painted wood and green stained glass windows.

LGBTQ Rights

Brandt et al v. Rutledge et al

Four families of transgender youth and two doctors have challenged an Arkansas law that would prohibit healthcare professionals from providing or even referring transgender young people for medically necessary health care. The law would also bar any state funds or insurance coverage for gender-affirming health care for transgender people under 18, and it would allow private insurers to refuse to cover gender-affirming care for people of any age. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges that House Bill 1570 is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Brandt Et Al V. Rutledge Et Al. Explore Case.
34
5
67...