Immigrants' Rights and Detention
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2021
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf
The 桃子视频, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Gender & Refugee Studies filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 new policy forcing asylum seekers to return to Mexico and remain there while their cases are considered.
All Cases
41 Immigrants' Rights and Detention Cases
Court Case
Mar 2020
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
U.T. v. Barr
The 桃子视频, National Immigrant Justice Center, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, and Human Rights First filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 policies regarding so-called 鈥渟afe third country鈥 agreements with Guatemala and other nations that force people fleeing for their lives to seek asylum in the same dangerous region they fled.
Explore case
Court Case
Mar 2020
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
U.T. v. Barr
The 桃子视频, National Immigrant Justice Center, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, and Human Rights First filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 policies regarding so-called 鈥渟afe third country鈥 agreements with Guatemala and other nations that force people fleeing for their lives to seek asylum in the same dangerous region they fled.
Court Case
Dec 2017
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
Hernandez v. Barr
The federal government sets unreasonable bonds for detained immigrants, including asylum seekers, by failing to consider immigrants' financial resources or ability to pay, according to a federal class-action lawsuit
filed by the 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频Foundation of Southern California (桃子视频SoCal).
Explore case
Court Case
Dec 2017
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
Hernandez v. Barr
The federal government sets unreasonable bonds for detained immigrants, including asylum seekers, by failing to consider immigrants' financial resources or ability to pay, according to a federal class-action lawsuit
filed by the 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频Foundation of Southern California (桃子视频SoCal).
Court Case
Apr 2017
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
Castro v. Department of Homeland Security
The 桃子视频filed habeas petitions on behalf of more than two dozen families who fled horrific violence and persecution in Central America and whose applications for asylum in the United States were denied after a cursory expedited review.
Explore case
Court Case
Apr 2017
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
Castro v. Department of Homeland Security
The 桃子视频filed habeas petitions on behalf of more than two dozen families who fled horrific violence and persecution in Central America and whose applications for asylum in the United States were denied after a cursory expedited review.
Massachusetts
Dec 2015
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
Gordon v. Johnson and CASTA脩EDA v. Souza
In Gordon v. Johnson, the 桃子视频and its partners obtained a class action ruling making some 150 Massachusetts detainees a year eligible for individual bond hearings. Rather than being held in 鈥渕andatory鈥 immigration detention, without a bond hearing, these noncitizens may now obtain their release if an immigration judge concludes that they do not pose a danger or flight risk. Since May 2014, the federal district court鈥檚 ruling has allowed more than 100 noncitizens to be released from mandatory detention and remain with their families while their immigration cases are resolved.
Explore case
Massachusetts
Dec 2015
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
Gordon v. Johnson and CASTA脩EDA v. Souza
In Gordon v. Johnson, the 桃子视频and its partners obtained a class action ruling making some 150 Massachusetts detainees a year eligible for individual bond hearings. Rather than being held in 鈥渕andatory鈥 immigration detention, without a bond hearing, these noncitizens may now obtain their release if an immigration judge concludes that they do not pose a danger or flight risk. Since May 2014, the federal district court鈥檚 ruling has allowed more than 100 noncitizens to be released from mandatory detention and remain with their families while their immigration cases are resolved.
California
Oct 2015
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
Rodriguez, et al. v. Robbins, et al.
On October 29, 2015, a federal appeals court affirmed and expanded its prior ruling that immigrants in prolonged detention receive a bond hearing. In Rodriguez v. Robbins, a class-action lawsuit , the court upheld an order requiring bond hearings for detainees locked up six months or longer while they fight their deportation cases. The ruling stands to benefit thousands of immigration detainees across the Ninth Circuit, where an estimated 25% of immigrant detainees are held every year.
Explore case
California
Oct 2015
Immigrants' Rights and Detention
Rodriguez, et al. v. Robbins, et al.
On October 29, 2015, a federal appeals court affirmed and expanded its prior ruling that immigrants in prolonged detention receive a bond hearing. In Rodriguez v. Robbins, a class-action lawsuit , the court upheld an order requiring bond hearings for detainees locked up six months or longer while they fight their deportation cases. The ruling stands to benefit thousands of immigration detainees across the Ninth Circuit, where an estimated 25% of immigrant detainees are held every year.