Human Rights
FOIA Case Seeking the Trump Administration鈥檚 Legal Justification for Deadly Boat Strikes
The Department of Justice鈥檚 Office of Legal Counsel (鈥淥LC鈥�) authored a legal opinion that reportedly claims to justify the Trump administration鈥檚 illegal lethal strikes on civilians in boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean. Media reports indicate that, in addition to claiming that the strikes are lawful acts in an alleged 鈥渁rmed conflict鈥� with unspecified drug cartels, the OLC opinion also purports to immunize personnel who authorized or took part in the strikes from future criminal prosecution. Because the public deserves to know how our government is justifying these illegal strikes, and why they think the people who carried them out should not be held accountable, the 桃子视频is seeking immediate release of the OLC legal opinion and related documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn About Human Rights
Featured
Washington, D.C.
Jun 2019
Human Rights
Weir v. U.S.
The 桃子视频 filed a federal lawsuit in June 2019 against the United States and the head of the U.S. Coast Guard on behalf of four Jamaican fishermen, who were forcibly removed from their fishing boat and detained for over a month at sea on four U.S. Coast Guard ships in patently inhumane conditions.
All Cases
27 Human Rights Cases
Court Case
May 2010
Human Rights
+3 桃子视频
Request for Hearing on U.S. Felon Disfranchisement Laws to the IACHR
The felony disfranchisement laws, policies and practices of the United States violate the right to vote free from discrimination under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.
Explore case
Court Case
May 2010
Human Rights
+3 桃子视频
Request for Hearing on U.S. Felon Disfranchisement Laws to the IACHR
The felony disfranchisement laws, policies and practices of the United States violate the right to vote free from discrimination under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2010
Human Rights
Smart Justice
20th Anniversary of the Convention on the Rights of the Child
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2010
Human Rights
Smart Justice
20th Anniversary of the Convention on the Rights of the Child
Court Case
Aug 2009
Human Rights
+2 桃子视频
KC v Nedelkoff
On June 12, 2008 the 桃子视频filed a class action lawsuit challenging inhumane practices - punitive solitary confinement, routine strip searches, and other forms of abuse - at the Brownwood State School, a youth prison in central Texas.
Explore case
Court Case
Aug 2009
Human Rights
+2 桃子视频
KC v Nedelkoff
On June 12, 2008 the 桃子视频filed a class action lawsuit challenging inhumane practices - punitive solitary confinement, routine strip searches, and other forms of abuse - at the Brownwood State School, a youth prison in central Texas.
Court Case
Aug 2009
Human Rights
National Security
Case Profile: Enforced Disappearance of Mustafa Setmariam Nassar
Mustafa Setmariam Nassar is a Spanish citizen of Syrian origin who was forcibly disappeared some time in October 2005.
Explore case
Court Case
Aug 2009
Human Rights
National Security
Case Profile: Enforced Disappearance of Mustafa Setmariam Nassar
Mustafa Setmariam Nassar is a Spanish citizen of Syrian origin who was forcibly disappeared some time in October 2005.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2006
Human Rights
+3 桃子视频
New Jersey Men and Women Prohibited from Voting Pursuant to State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies and Practices Petition the IACHR
The felony disfranchisement laws, policies and practices of the United States violate the right to vote free from discrimination under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2006
Human Rights
+3 桃子视频
New Jersey Men and Women Prohibited from Voting Pursuant to State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies and Practices Petition the IACHR
The felony disfranchisement laws, policies and practices of the United States violate the right to vote free from discrimination under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.