Gerrymandering

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025
Alabama on a map of the United States of America

Gerrymandering

Racial Justice

Allen v. Milligan

Whether Alabama’s congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade. In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
Allen V. Milligan. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Mississippi

Gerrymandering

State Board of Election Commissioners v. Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP

Mississippi has a growing Black population, which is already the largest Black population percentage of any state in the country. Yet. Black Mississippians continue to be significantly under-represented in the state legislature, as Mississippi’s latest districting maps fail to reflect the reality of the state’s changing demographics. During the 2022 redistricting process, the Mississippi legislature refused to create any new districts where Black voters have a chance to elect their preferred representative. The current district lines therefore dilute the voting power of Black Mississippians and continue to deprive them of political representation that is responsive to their needs and concerns, including severe disparities in education and healthcare.
State Board Of Election Commissioners V. Mississippi State Conference Of The Naacp. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Louisiana

Gerrymandering

Louisiana v. Callais (Callais v. Landry)

Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
Louisiana V. Callais (callais V. Landry). Explore Case.
Missouri
Sep 2025
A close up of an "I Voted" sticker.

Gerrymandering

Wise v. Missouri

In unprecedented fashion, the State of Missouri has redrawn the district lines used for electing members of Congress for a second time this decade. These new district lines are gerrymandered and will harm political representation for all Missourians, particularly Black residents in Kansas City, who have been divided along racial lines.
Wise V. Missouri. Explore Case.

All Cases

32 Gerrymandering Cases

Gerrymandering activists gather on the steps of the Supreme Court as the court prepares to hear the the Benisek v. Lamone case on Wednesday, March 28, 2018.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2023

Gerrymandering

Huffman v. Neiman

This case asks whether the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution bars the Ohio state court from enforcing redistricting requirements in the Ohio constitution that prohibit partisan gerrymandering.
Explore case
Huffman V. Neiman. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2023
Gerrymandering activists gather on the steps of the Supreme Court as the court prepares to hear the the Benisek v. Lamone case on Wednesday, March 28, 2018.

Gerrymandering

Huffman v. Neiman

This case asks whether the Elections Clause of the U.S. Constitution bars the Ohio state court from enforcing redistricting requirements in the Ohio constitution that prohibit partisan gerrymandering.
Huffman V. Neiman. Explore Case.
scotus
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2022

Gerrymandering

Moore v. Harper (Amicus)

Can state legislatures draw gerrymandered districts and make other rules for federal elections without any check from state courts applying the rules of their own state constitutions?
Explore case
Moore V. Harper (amicus). Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2022
scotus

Gerrymandering

Moore v. Harper (Amicus)

Can state legislatures draw gerrymandered districts and make other rules for federal elections without any check from state courts applying the rules of their own state constitutions?
Moore V. Harper (amicus). Explore Case.
KS
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2022

Gerrymandering

Alonzo v. Schwab

Does the Constitution prohibit racial discrimination in redistricting regardless of the size of the group targeted by the state?
Explore case
Alonzo V. Schwab. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2022
KS

Gerrymandering

Alonzo v. Schwab

Does the Constitution prohibit racial discrimination in redistricting regardless of the size of the group targeted by the state?
Alonzo V. Schwab. Explore Case.
SC Legislative
South Carolina
May 2022

Gerrymandering

South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. Alexander (State House Map Challenge)

This case -- part of a broader challenge to South Carolina's redistricting after the 2020 Census -- involved a racial gerrymandering claim against the State's House district lines. Plaintiffs the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and an individual voter challenged the drawing of 29 specific districts as unconstitutional racial gerrymanders. In May 2022, the parties settled their dispute over State House maps, which resulted in redrawn districts in Dillon, Horry, Kershaw, Orangeburg, and Richland counties.
Explore case
South Carolina State Conference Of The Naacp V. Alexander (state House Map Challenge). Explore Case.
South Carolina
May 2022
SC Legislative

Gerrymandering

South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. Alexander (State House Map Challenge)

This case -- part of a broader challenge to South Carolina's redistricting after the 2020 Census -- involved a racial gerrymandering claim against the State's House district lines. Plaintiffs the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and an individual voter challenged the drawing of 29 specific districts as unconstitutional racial gerrymanders. In May 2022, the parties settled their dispute over State House maps, which resulted in redrawn districts in Dillon, Horry, Kershaw, Orangeburg, and Richland counties.
South Carolina State Conference Of The Naacp V. Alexander (state House Map Challenge). Explore Case.
A demonstrator at the March On for Voting Rights in Washington D.C. holds up a sign reading "Suppression and Gerrymandering are Not Democracy".
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2019

Gerrymandering

Rucho v. Common Cause/Benisek v. Lamone (Amicus)

Whether partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable and whether the plaintiffs in North Carolina and Maryland established that the legislatures had impermissibly sought to benefit one party over the other, regardless of how voters voted.
Explore case
Rucho V. Common Cause/benisek V. Lamone (amicus). Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2019
A demonstrator at the March On for Voting Rights in Washington D.C. holds up a sign reading "Suppression and Gerrymandering are Not Democracy".

Gerrymandering

Rucho v. Common Cause/Benisek v. Lamone (Amicus)

Whether partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable and whether the plaintiffs in North Carolina and Maryland established that the legislatures had impermissibly sought to benefit one party over the other, regardless of how voters voted.
Rucho V. Common Cause/benisek V. Lamone (amicus). Explore Case.
34
5
67