The Freedom to Marry

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Bourke Family

The Freedom to Marry

Bourke v. Beshear & Love v. Beshear - Freedom to Marry in Kentucky

Bourke v. Beshear is a federal court challenge to Kentucky's constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples, filed by attorneys at Clay Daniel Walton & Adams and Fauver Law Office on July 26, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are four same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their out-of-state marriages.
Bourke V. Beshear & Love V. Beshear - Freedom To Marry In Kentucky. Explore Case.

All Cases

28 The Freedom to Marry Cases

Whitewood v. Wolf - Freedom to Marry in Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
May 2014

The Freedom to Marry

Whitewood v. Wolf - Freedom to Marry in Pennsylvania

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ of Pennsylvania, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, and volunteer counsel from the law firm of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller have filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of 21 Pennsylvanians who wish to marry in Pennsylvania or want the Commonwealth to recognize their out-of-state marriages. The lawsuit alleges that Pennsylvania's Defense of Marriage Act and refusal to marry lesbian and gay couples or recognize their out-of-state marriages violates the fundamental right to marry as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Explore case
Whitewood V. Wolf - Freedom To Marry In Pennsylvania. Explore Case.
Pennsylvania
May 2014
Whitewood v. Wolf - Freedom to Marry in Pennsylvania

The Freedom to Marry

Whitewood v. Wolf - Freedom to Marry in Pennsylvania

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ of Pennsylvania, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, and volunteer counsel from the law firm of Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller have filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of 21 Pennsylvanians who wish to marry in Pennsylvania or want the Commonwealth to recognize their out-of-state marriages. The lawsuit alleges that Pennsylvania's Defense of Marriage Act and refusal to marry lesbian and gay couples or recognize their out-of-state marriages violates the fundamental right to marry as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Whitewood V. Wolf - Freedom To Marry In Pennsylvania. Explore Case.
Windsor v. United States
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2014

The Freedom to Marry

Windsor v. United States

Whether the Defense of Marriage Act violates equal protection by denying married gay couples recognition under federal law.
Explore case
Windsor V. United States. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2014
Windsor v. United States

The Freedom to Marry

Windsor v. United States

Whether the Defense of Marriage Act violates equal protection by denying married gay couples recognition under federal law.
Windsor V. United States. Explore Case.
Griego v. Oliver - Freedom to Marry in New Mexico
New Mexico
Apr 2014

The Freedom to Marry

Griego v. Oliver - Freedom to Marry in New Mexico

Six same-sex couples, represented by the ACLU, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof New Mexico, the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) and Albuquerque law firm Sutin, Thayer & Browne, APC, filed a lawsuit against the State of New Mexico and the Santa Fe and Bernalillo County Clerks seeking the freedom to marry. The lawsuit argues that the New Mexico marriage statutes and the New Mexico Constitution do not bar same-sex couples from marrying, and that the New Mexico Constitution requires the state to allow same-sex couples the freedom to marry.
Explore case
Griego V. Oliver - Freedom To Marry In New Mexico. Explore Case.
New Mexico
Apr 2014
Griego v. Oliver - Freedom to Marry in New Mexico

The Freedom to Marry

Griego v. Oliver - Freedom to Marry in New Mexico

Six same-sex couples, represented by the ACLU, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof New Mexico, the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) and Albuquerque law firm Sutin, Thayer & Browne, APC, filed a lawsuit against the State of New Mexico and the Santa Fe and Bernalillo County Clerks seeking the freedom to marry. The lawsuit argues that the New Mexico marriage statutes and the New Mexico Constitution do not bar same-sex couples from marrying, and that the New Mexico Constitution requires the state to allow same-sex couples the freedom to marry.
Griego V. Oliver - Freedom To Marry In New Mexico. Explore Case.
Lazaro and Matos v. Orr - Freedom to Marry in Illinois
Illinois
Apr 2014

The Freedom to Marry

Lazaro and Matos v. Orr - Freedom to Marry in Illinois

On behalf of nine Illinois couples seeking recognition for their shared love and commitment, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Illinois have filed a lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of Illinois' law that denies gay and lesbian couples the freedom to marry. Currently, Illinois law excludes gay and lesbian couples from the recognition and protections that come with the universally recognized relationship status of marriage, and limits them instead to a separate civil union status.
Explore case
Lazaro And Matos V. Orr - Freedom To Marry In Illinois. Explore Case.
Illinois
Apr 2014
Lazaro and Matos v. Orr - Freedom to Marry in Illinois

The Freedom to Marry

Lazaro and Matos v. Orr - Freedom to Marry in Illinois

On behalf of nine Illinois couples seeking recognition for their shared love and commitment, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ and the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Illinois have filed a lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of Illinois' law that denies gay and lesbian couples the freedom to marry. Currently, Illinois law excludes gay and lesbian couples from the recognition and protections that come with the universally recognized relationship status of marriage, and limits them instead to a separate civil union status.
Lazaro And Matos V. Orr - Freedom To Marry In Illinois. Explore Case.
Hollingsworth v. Perry
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2013

The Freedom to Marry

Hollingsworth v. Perry

Whether California’s Proposition 8, which amended the state constitution to define marriage as solely between a man and a woman, violates equal protection.
Explore case
Hollingsworth V. Perry. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2013
Hollingsworth v. Perry

The Freedom to Marry

Hollingsworth v. Perry

Whether California’s Proposition 8, which amended the state constitution to define marriage as solely between a man and a woman, violates equal protection.
Hollingsworth V. Perry. Explore Case.
34
5
6