U.S. Supreme Court
Joan and Irwin Jacobs Supreme Court Docket
- Select Term
- 2025 Term
- 2024 Term
- 2023 Term
- 2022 Term
- 2021 Term
- 2020 Term
- 2019 Term
- 2018 Term
- 2017 Term
- 2016 Term
- 2015 Term
- 2014 Term
- 2013 Term
- 2012 Term
- 2011 Term
- 2010 Term
- 2009 Term
- 2008 Term
- 2007 Term
- 2006 Term
- 2005 Term
- 2004 Term
- 2003 Term
- 2002 Term
- 2001 Term
- 2000 Term
- 1999 Term
- 1998 Term
- 1997 Term
- 1996 Term
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2021
Immigrants' Rights
Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf
The 桃子视频, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Gender & Refugee Studies filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 new policy forcing asylum seekers to return to Mexico and remain there while their cases are considered.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2021
Immigrants' Rights
National Security
Sierra Club v. Trump 鈥� Challenge to Trump鈥檚 National Emergency Declaration to Construct a Border Wall
In February 2019, the 桃子视频filed a lawsuit challenging President Trump鈥檚 emergency powers declaration to secure funds to build a wall along the southern border. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition. The lawsuit argues that the president is usurping Congress鈥檚 appropriations power and threatening the clearly defined separation of powers inscribed in the Constitution. On January 20, 2021, President Biden halted further border wall construction. Litigation in this and subsequent related challenges has been paused or deadlines extended while the ACLU鈥檚 clients and the Biden administration determine next steps.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021
Free Speech
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
On September 25, 2017, the ACLU-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
All Cases
24 Supreme Court Cases during the 2020 Term
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Criminal Law Reform
Edwards v. Vannoy
Whether the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, holding that the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a unanimous jury verdict, applies retroactively to cases on federal collateral review.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Criminal Law Reform
Edwards v. Vannoy
Whether the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, holding that the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a unanimous jury verdict, applies retroactively to cases on federal collateral review.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Criminal Law Reform
Oliva v. Nivar
Whether individuals can challenge the conduct of federal officials engaged in standard law enforcement operations as unconstitutional under Bivens or whether such claims present a new context unless they involve narcotics officers 鈥渕anacling the plaintiff in front of his family in his home and stripsearching him in violation of the Fourth Amendment,鈥� as the Fifth Circuit held.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Criminal Law Reform
Oliva v. Nivar
Whether individuals can challenge the conduct of federal officials engaged in standard law enforcement operations as unconstitutional under Bivens or whether such claims present a new context unless they involve narcotics officers 鈥渕anacling the plaintiff in front of his family in his home and stripsearching him in violation of the Fourth Amendment,鈥� as the Fifth Circuit held.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Juvenile Justice
Jones v. Mississippi
Whether the Eighth Amendment requires a judge or jury to make a finding that a juvenile is 鈥減ermanently incorrigible鈥� before imposing a sentence of life without parole.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Juvenile Justice
Jones v. Mississippi
Whether the Eighth Amendment requires a judge or jury to make a finding that a juvenile is 鈥減ermanently incorrigible鈥� before imposing a sentence of life without parole.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Civil Liberties
Transunion v. Ramirez
Whether 8,185 people who were all falsely labeled terrorists by TransUnion, a credit reporting company, can be represented in a class action consistent with Article III and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Civil Liberties
Transunion v. Ramirez
Whether 8,185 people who were all falsely labeled terrorists by TransUnion, a credit reporting company, can be represented in a class action consistent with Article III and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Criminal Law Reform
Brownback v. King
Whether the district court鈥檚 dismissal of a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) claim against the United States for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction bars adjudication of simultaneously filed constitutional claims against the individual officers responsible for the plaintiff鈥檚 injuries.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Criminal Law Reform
Brownback v. King
Whether the district court鈥檚 dismissal of a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) claim against the United States for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction bars adjudication of simultaneously filed constitutional claims against the individual officers responsible for the plaintiff鈥檚 injuries.
How Do Terms Work?
Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is 鈥渋n session,鈥� meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.
Submitting petitions
Our legal team at the 桃子视频files a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.
term starts
U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case
On average, the Court considers about 7,000 鈥� 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.
Oral arguments
This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.
U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions
While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!