U.S. Supreme Court
Joan and Irwin Jacobs Supreme Court Docket
- Select Term
- 2025 Term
- 2024 Term
- 2023 Term
- 2022 Term
- 2021 Term
- 2020 Term
- 2019 Term
- 2018 Term
- 2017 Term
- 2016 Term
- 2015 Term
- 2014 Term
- 2013 Term
- 2012 Term
- 2011 Term
- 2010 Term
- 2009 Term
- 2008 Term
- 2007 Term
- 2006 Term
- 2005 Term
- 2004 Term
- 2003 Term
- 2002 Term
- 2001 Term
- 2000 Term
- 1999 Term
- 1998 Term
- 1997 Term
- 1996 Term
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025
Voting Rights
Racial Justice
Allen v. Milligan
Whether Alabama鈥檚 congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade.
In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
All Cases
29 Supreme Court Cases during the 2022 Term
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Disability Rights
Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski
The 桃子视频filed an amicus brief in Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski to urge the Supreme Court to uphold private individuals鈥� right to sue state and local actors for violations of their federal civil rights under Section 1983.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Disability Rights
Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski
The 桃子视频filed an amicus brief in Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski to urge the Supreme Court to uphold private individuals鈥� right to sue state and local actors for violations of their federal civil rights under Section 1983.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
LGBTQ Rights
+2 桃子视频
303 Creative, Inc. v. Elenis
This case concerns whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel a business that chooses to serve the public to provide wedding website design services without discriminating against a same-sex couple violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
LGBTQ Rights
+2 桃子视频
303 Creative, Inc. v. Elenis
This case concerns whether applying a public-accommodation law to compel a business that chooses to serve the public to provide wedding website design services without discriminating against a same-sex couple violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Criminal Law Reform
Khorrami v. Arizona
This case concerns whether a person charged with a felony is guaranteed the right to a 12-person jury trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Criminal Law Reform
Khorrami v. Arizona
This case concerns whether a person charged with a felony is guaranteed the right to a 12-person jury trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Capital Punishment
Criminal Law Reform
Cruz v. Arizona
This case concerns whether a state prisoner can be barred from challenging a state court鈥檚 decision denying his right to inform the jury about relevant sentencing information, where the state court applied a novel rule to bar his ability to present the issue on post-conviction review.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Capital Punishment
Criminal Law Reform
Cruz v. Arizona
This case concerns whether a state prisoner can be barred from challenging a state court鈥檚 decision denying his right to inform the jury about relevant sentencing information, where the state court applied a novel rule to bar his ability to present the issue on post-conviction review.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Free Speech
Counterman v. Colorado
This case asks 鈥淸w]hether, to establish that a statement is a 鈥榯rue threat鈥� unprotected by the First Amendment, the government must show that the speaker subjectively knew or intended the threatening nature of the statement, or whether it is enough to show that an objective 鈥榬easonable person鈥� would regard the statement as a threat of violence.鈥�
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Free Speech
Counterman v. Colorado
This case asks 鈥淸w]hether, to establish that a statement is a 鈥榯rue threat鈥� unprotected by the First Amendment, the government must show that the speaker subjectively knew or intended the threatening nature of the statement, or whether it is enough to show that an objective 鈥榬easonable person鈥� would regard the statement as a threat of violence.鈥�
How Do Terms Work?
Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is 鈥渋n session,鈥� meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.
Submitting petitions
Our legal team at the 桃子视频files a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.
term starts
U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case
On average, the Court considers about 7,000 鈥� 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.
Oral arguments
This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.
U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions
While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!