Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2021
Border Asylum Line

Immigrants' Rights

Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf

The 桃子视频, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Gender & Refugee Studies filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 new policy forcing asylum seekers to return to Mexico and remain there while their cases are considered.
Innovation Law Lab V. Wolf. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2021
Trump Declaring National Emergency

Immigrants' Rights

National Security

Sierra Club v. Trump 鈥 Challenge to Trump鈥檚 National Emergency Declaration to Construct a Border Wall

In February 2019, the 桃子视频filed a lawsuit challenging President Trump鈥檚 emergency powers declaration to secure funds to build a wall along the southern border. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition. The lawsuit argues that the president is usurping Congress鈥檚 appropriations power and threatening the clearly defined separation of powers inscribed in the Constitution. On January 20, 2021, President Biden halted further border wall construction. Litigation in this and subsequent related challenges has been paused or deadlines extended while the ACLU鈥檚 clients and the Biden administration determine next steps.
Sierra Club V. Trump 鈥 Challenge To Trump鈥檚 National Emergency Declaration To Construct A Border Wall. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

Free Speech

Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

On September 25, 2017, the ACLU-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
Mahanoy Area School District V. B.l.. Explore Case.

All Cases

24 Supreme Court Cases during the 2020 Term

Robert Andrews v. State of New Jersey
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021

Privacy & Technology

Robert Andrews v. State of New Jersey

Whether the Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment protects an individual from being compelled to recall and truthfully disclose a memorized smartphone passcode, where communicating the passcode may lead to the discovery of incriminating evidence to be used against him in a criminal prosecution?
Explore case
Robert Andrews V. State Of New Jersey. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Robert Andrews v. State of New Jersey

Privacy & Technology

Robert Andrews v. State of New Jersey

Whether the Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment protects an individual from being compelled to recall and truthfully disclose a memorized smartphone passcode, where communicating the passcode may lead to the discovery of incriminating evidence to be used against him in a criminal prosecution?
Robert Andrews V. State Of New Jersey. Explore Case.
Alasaad Family
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021

Privacy & Technology

National Security

Merchant v. Mayorkas

The 桃子视频, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the 桃子视频of Massachusetts have filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security on behalf of 11 travelers whose smartphones and laptops were searched without warrants at the U.S. border.
Explore case
Merchant V. Mayorkas. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Alasaad Family

Privacy & Technology

National Security

Merchant v. Mayorkas

The 桃子视频, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the 桃子视频of Massachusetts have filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security on behalf of 11 travelers whose smartphones and laptops were searched without warrants at the U.S. border.
Merchant V. Mayorkas. Explore Case.
Image of the supreme court building in Washington, DC
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021

Civil Liberties

Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski

Whether a request for nominal damages to redress a past constitutional violation is sufficient to allow the court to rule, where the government has changed the challenged policy so there is no need for forward-looking relief.
Explore case
Uzuegbunam V. Preczewski. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Image of the supreme court building in Washington, DC

Civil Liberties

Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski

Whether a request for nominal damages to redress a past constitutional violation is sufficient to allow the court to rule, where the government has changed the challenged policy so there is no need for forward-looking relief.
Uzuegbunam V. Preczewski. Explore Case.
Image of the supreme court building in Washington, DC
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021

Privacy & Technology

Arthur Gregory Lange v. California

Whether the Fourth Amendment permits the police, in all cases, to pursue an individual into a private home without a warrant while attempting to make a misdemeanor arrest, or whether specific exigent circumstances are required.
Explore case
Arthur Gregory Lange V. California. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Image of the supreme court building in Washington, DC

Privacy & Technology

Arthur Gregory Lange v. California

Whether the Fourth Amendment permits the police, in all cases, to pursue an individual into a private home without a warrant while attempting to make a misdemeanor arrest, or whether specific exigent circumstances are required.
Arthur Gregory Lange V. California. Explore Case.
Lombardo v. City of Saint Louis, 20鈥391
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021

Criminal Law Reform

Lombardo v. City of Saint Louis, 20鈥391

Whether a reasonable jury could find that police officers violate the Constitution鈥檚 prohibition on excessive force when they kill a shackled and handcuffed arrestee inside of a jail cell by holding him face-down on the ground and pressing into his back until he suffocated, also known as compression asphyxiation.
Explore case
Lombardo V. City Of Saint Louis, 20鈥391. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
Lombardo v. City of Saint Louis, 20鈥391

Criminal Law Reform

Lombardo v. City of Saint Louis, 20鈥391

Whether a reasonable jury could find that police officers violate the Constitution鈥檚 prohibition on excessive force when they kill a shackled and handcuffed arrestee inside of a jail cell by holding him face-down on the ground and pressing into his back until he suffocated, also known as compression asphyxiation.
Lombardo V. City Of Saint Louis, 20鈥391. Explore Case.
12
3
45

How Do Terms Work?

Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is 鈥渋n session,鈥 meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.

Submitting petitions

Our legal team at the 桃子视频files a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.

term starts

U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case

On average, the Court considers about 7,000 鈥 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.

Oral arguments

This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.

U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions

While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!