Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020
Department of Homeland Security v. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam

Immigrants' Rights

Department of Homeland Security v. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam

Whether immigrants are entitled to seek judicial review of their 鈥渆xpedited removal鈥 orders in federal court.
Department Of Homeland Security V. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020
Aimee Stephens in front of the Supreme Court

LGBTQ Rights

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC & Aimee Stephens

Aimee Stephens had worked for nearly six years as a funeral director at R.G. and G.R. Harris Funeral Homes when she informed the funeral home鈥檚 owner that she is a transgender woman. She was fired, the EEOC sued on her behalf, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Aimee鈥檚 employer engaged in unlawful sex discrimination when it fired her because she鈥檚 transgender. We represented Aimee Stephens in front of the U.S. Supreme Court 鈥 and won.
R.g. & G.r. Harris Funeral Homes V Eeoc & Aimee Stephens. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2020
Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey/Trump v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey

Religious Liberty

Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey/Trump v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey

Whether the government had statutory authority under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 to expand the conscience exemption to the contraceptive-coverage mandate.
Little Sisters Of The Poor V. Pennsylvania And New Jersey/trump V. Pennsylvania And New Jersey. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2020
Supreme Court

Civil Liberties

Trump v. Mazars/Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG

Whether President Trump should comply with congressional subpoenas and hand over his personal finance documents.
Trump V. Mazars/trump V. Deutsche Bank Ag. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2020
Supreme Court

Civil Liberties

Trump v. Vance

Whether President Trump should comply with a grandy jury subpoena and hand over his personal finance documents.
Trump V. Vance. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
Don Zarda, Melissa Zarda, Bill Moore

LGBTQ Rights

Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda

Don Zarda loved to skydive. He worked as a skydiving instructor at Altitude Express, a company on Long Island, N.Y. He was fired for being gay.
Altitude Express Inc. V. Zarda. Explore Case.

All Cases

17 Supreme Court Cases during the 2019 Term

Ovalles v. Barr & Guerrero-LaSprilla v. Barr
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019

Immigrants' Rights

Ovalles v. Barr & Guerrero-LaSprilla v. Barr

Whether a lawful permanent resident convicted of a crime can appeal a final removal order, where the court denied judicial review because it found that he lacked diligence for equitable tolling purposes.
Explore case
Ovalles V. Barr & Guerrero-lasprilla V. Barr. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
Ovalles v. Barr & Guerrero-LaSprilla v. Barr

Immigrants' Rights

Ovalles v. Barr & Guerrero-LaSprilla v. Barr

Whether a lawful permanent resident convicted of a crime can appeal a final removal order, where the court denied judicial review because it found that he lacked diligence for equitable tolling purposes.
Ovalles V. Barr & Guerrero-lasprilla V. Barr. Explore Case.
A solitary confinement cell
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019

Juvenile Justice

Mathena v. Malvo

Whether a juvenile sentenced to life without parole is entitled to a new sentencing proceeding following the Supreme Court's decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, which have retroactive effect to a previous decision prohibiting mandatory sentences of life without parole for juveniles, where it is unclear whether the original sentence was imposed under a mandatory or discretionary state sentencing scheme.
Explore case
Mathena V. Malvo. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
A solitary confinement cell

Juvenile Justice

Mathena v. Malvo

Whether a juvenile sentenced to life without parole is entitled to a new sentencing proceeding following the Supreme Court's decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, which have retroactive effect to a previous decision prohibiting mandatory sentences of life without parole for juveniles, where it is unclear whether the original sentence was imposed under a mandatory or discretionary state sentencing scheme.
Mathena V. Malvo. Explore Case.
McKinney v. Arizona
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019

Capital Punishment

McKinney v. Arizona

Mr. James Erin McKinney was sentenced to death by a judge who failed to consider significant mitigating evidence concerning Mr. McKinney鈥檚 PTSD.
Explore case
Mckinney V. Arizona. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
McKinney v. Arizona

Capital Punishment

McKinney v. Arizona

Mr. James Erin McKinney was sentenced to death by a judge who failed to consider significant mitigating evidence concerning Mr. McKinney鈥檚 PTSD.
Mckinney V. Arizona. Explore Case.
Puerto Rico and American Flag
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019

Racial Justice

Voting Rights

Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC

The 桃子视频filed an amicus brief in connection with a case addressing the constitutionality of the financial oversight board established for Puerto Rico by Congress in 2016.
Explore case
Financial Oversight And Management Board For Puerto Rico V. Aurelius Investment, Llc. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
Puerto Rico and American Flag

Racial Justice

Voting Rights

Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC

The 桃子视频filed an amicus brief in connection with a case addressing the constitutionality of the financial oversight board established for Puerto Rico by Congress in 2016.
Financial Oversight And Management Board For Puerto Rico V. Aurelius Investment, Llc. Explore Case.
Hernandez v. Mesa
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2019

Immigrants' Rights

Hernandez v. Mesa

Whether the parents of a 15-year old Mexican boy who was fatally shot by a United States Border Patrol Agent can bring a Bivens action against the Agent for using deadly force in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments when there is no alternative remedy.
Explore case
Hernandez V. Mesa. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2019
Hernandez v. Mesa

Immigrants' Rights

Hernandez v. Mesa

Whether the parents of a 15-year old Mexican boy who was fatally shot by a United States Border Patrol Agent can bring a Bivens action against the Agent for using deadly force in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments when there is no alternative remedy.
Hernandez V. Mesa. Explore Case.
12
3
4

How Do Terms Work?

Between October and late June or early July the Supreme Court is 鈥渋n session,鈥 meaning it hears oral arguments, issues written decisions, and decides whether to take additional cases.

Submitting petitions

Our legal team at the 桃子视频files a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, a type of petition that usually argues that a lower court has incorrectly decided an important question of law that violates civil rights and should be fixed to prevent similar confusion in similar cases.

term starts

U.S. Supreme Court decides to take a case

On average, the Court considers about 7,000 鈥 8,000 petitions each term and accepts about 80 for oral argument.

Oral arguments

This is the period where the U.S. Supreme Court listens to our case in court.

U.S. Supreme Court makes final decisions

While the U.S. Supreme Court makes decisions throughout the term, many are released right before the term ends. If a decision doesn't go in our favor, we fight back!