The Voting Rights Act

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025
Alabama on a map of the United States of America

The Voting Rights Act

Racial Justice

Allen v. Milligan

Whether Alabama’s congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade. In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
Allen V. Milligan. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Mississippi

The Voting Rights Act

State Board of Election Commissioners v. Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP

Mississippi has a growing Black population, which is already the largest Black population percentage of any state in the country. Yet. Black Mississippians continue to be significantly under-represented in the state legislature, as Mississippi’s latest districting maps fail to reflect the reality of the state’s changing demographics. During the 2022 redistricting process, the Mississippi legislature refused to create any new districts where Black voters have a chance to elect their preferred representative. The current district lines therefore dilute the voting power of Black Mississippians and continue to deprive them of political representation that is responsive to their needs and concerns, including severe disparities in education and healthcare.
State Board Of Election Commissioners V. Mississippi State Conference Of The Naacp. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Louisiana

The Voting Rights Act

Louisiana v. Callais (Callais v. Landry)

Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
Louisiana V. Callais (callais V. Landry). Explore Case.

All Cases

16 The Voting Rights Act Cases

Arkansas
Arkansas
Jan 2024

The Voting Rights Act

NAACP v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment

This case has two key parts: First, the Arkansas House district map diminishes the voting power of Black voters. Second, both the district court and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals radically concluded that voters may not sue to protect their voting rights under Section 2, putting the VRA in further jeopardy and contradicting decades of precedent in which impacted voters — particularly Black voters — have challenged racially discriminatory voting laws.
Explore case
Naacp V. Arkansas Board Of Apportionment. Explore Case.
Arkansas
Jan 2024
Arkansas

The Voting Rights Act

NAACP v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment

This case has two key parts: First, the Arkansas House district map diminishes the voting power of Black voters. Second, both the district court and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals radically concluded that voters may not sue to protect their voting rights under Section 2, putting the VRA in further jeopardy and contradicting decades of precedent in which impacted voters — particularly Black voters — have challenged racially discriminatory voting laws.
Naacp V. Arkansas Board Of Apportionment. Explore Case.
Louisiana
Louisiana
Dec 2023

The Voting Rights Act

Robinson v. Landry

Robinson challenged the congressional map that Louisiana enacted after the 2020 Census. ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand partners represented Plaintiffs the Louisiana State Conference of the NAACP, Power Coalition for Equity and Justice, and several impacted voters, and argued that the enacted plan violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. In June 2022, the district court found Louisiana's congressional map unlawfully denied Black voters a second district in which Black voters had an equal opportunity to elect their candidates of choice. After appeals, the legislature passed a new map containing two majority Black districts in January 2024.
Explore case
Robinson V. Landry. Explore Case.
Louisiana
Dec 2023
Louisiana

The Voting Rights Act

Robinson v. Landry

Robinson challenged the congressional map that Louisiana enacted after the 2020 Census. ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand partners represented Plaintiffs the Louisiana State Conference of the NAACP, Power Coalition for Equity and Justice, and several impacted voters, and argued that the enacted plan violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. In June 2022, the district court found Louisiana's congressional map unlawfully denied Black voters a second district in which Black voters had an equal opportunity to elect their candidates of choice. After appeals, the legislature passed a new map containing two majority Black districts in January 2024.
Robinson V. Landry. Explore Case.
scotus
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021

The Voting Rights Act

Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (Amicus)

Whether limitations on ballot collection and out-of-precinct voting under Arizona law violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by denying or abridging the right to vote in a manner that has a racially discriminatory effect.
Explore case
Brnovich V. Democratic National Committee (amicus). Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021
scotus

The Voting Rights Act

Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (Amicus)

Whether limitations on ballot collection and out-of-precinct voting under Arizona law violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by denying or abridging the right to vote in a manner that has a racially discriminatory effect.
Brnovich V. Democratic National Committee (amicus). Explore Case.
Black Lives Matter protest
Court Case
Sep 2017

The Voting Rights Act

Voting Rights Trial in Ferguson

On December 18, 2014, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµfiled a federal lawsuit challenging the Ferguson-Florissant School District’s at-large electoral system used to elect school board members.
Explore case
Voting Rights Trial In Ferguson. Explore Case.
Court Case
Sep 2017
Black Lives Matter protest

The Voting Rights Act

Voting Rights Trial in Ferguson

On December 18, 2014, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµfiled a federal lawsuit challenging the Ferguson-Florissant School District’s at-large electoral system used to elect school board members.
Voting Rights Trial In Ferguson. Explore Case.
Shelby County v. Holder
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2014

The Voting Rights Act

Shelby County v. Holder

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is one of our nation’s most critical federal civil rights statutes. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which is a key element of the Act, requires certain jurisdictions that have a history of discriminatory voting practices to get advance approval from the federal government before changing their election laws.
Explore case
Shelby County V. Holder. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2014
Shelby County v. Holder

The Voting Rights Act

Shelby County v. Holder

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is one of our nation’s most critical federal civil rights statutes. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which is a key element of the Act, requires certain jurisdictions that have a history of discriminatory voting practices to get advance approval from the federal government before changing their election laws.
Shelby County V. Holder. Explore Case.
12
3
4