Smart Justice

Featured

Mississippi
Mar 2017
Dockery v. Hall

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Dockery v. Hall

The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated in a perpetual state of crisis where prisoners are at grave risk of death and loss of limbs. The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
Dockery V. Hall. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Smart Justice Cases

Cayeshia Johnson
South Carolina
Mar 2023

Smart Justice

Racial Justice

Brown v. Lexington County, et al

This case is part of a nationwide fight against criminalization of poverty and, specifically, debtors' prisons. On June 1, 2017, the ACLU's Racial Justice Program, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof South Carolina, and Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC filed a federal lawsuit challenging the illegal arrest and incarceration of indigent people in Lexington County, South Carolina, for failure to pay fines and fees, without determining willfulness or providing assistance to counsel. Those targeted by this long-standing practice could avoid jail only if they paid the entire amount of outstanding court fines and fees up front and in full. Indigent people who were unable to pay were incarcerated for weeks to months without ever seeing a judge, having a court hearing, or receiving help from a lawyer. The result was one of the most draconian debtors’ prisons uncovered by the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµsince 2010.
Explore case
Brown V. Lexington County, Et Al. Explore Case.
South Carolina
Mar 2023
Cayeshia Johnson

Smart Justice

Racial Justice

Brown v. Lexington County, et al

This case is part of a nationwide fight against criminalization of poverty and, specifically, debtors' prisons. On June 1, 2017, the ACLU's Racial Justice Program, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof South Carolina, and Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC filed a federal lawsuit challenging the illegal arrest and incarceration of indigent people in Lexington County, South Carolina, for failure to pay fines and fees, without determining willfulness or providing assistance to counsel. Those targeted by this long-standing practice could avoid jail only if they paid the entire amount of outstanding court fines and fees up front and in full. Indigent people who were unable to pay were incarcerated for weeks to months without ever seeing a judge, having a court hearing, or receiving help from a lawyer. The result was one of the most draconian debtors’ prisons uncovered by the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµsince 2010.
Brown V. Lexington County, Et Al. Explore Case.
Baltimore City Detention Center. Photo: Blink Ofanaye (https://www.flickr.com/photos/blinkofanaye/17638298175/)
Maryland
Jul 2022

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Duvall v. Hogan

The settlement agreement was approved by the court on June 28, 2016.
Explore case
Duvall V. Hogan. Explore Case.
Maryland
Jul 2022
Baltimore City Detention Center. Photo: Blink Ofanaye (https://www.flickr.com/photos/blinkofanaye/17638298175/)

Smart Justice

Prisoners' Rights

Duvall v. Hogan

The settlement agreement was approved by the court on June 28, 2016.
Duvall V. Hogan. Explore Case.
Past Due Bill
Georgia
May 2022

Smart Justice

Mock et al v. Glynn County et al

Explore case
Mock Et Al V. Glynn County Et Al. Explore Case.
Georgia
May 2022
Past Due Bill

Smart Justice

Mock et al v. Glynn County et al

Mock Et Al V. Glynn County Et Al. Explore Case.
Nashville Community Bail Fund v. Gentry
Tennessee
Sep 2021

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Nashville Community Bail Fund v. Gentry

In Nashville, local officials keep money posted as bail to pay fines and fees. This happens even when the person whose bond was posted shows up to their required court dates. Under a local court rule and policies from the criminal clerk, pretrial release is conditioned on future payment, which leverages pretrial freedom to make money for the government.
Explore case
Nashville Community Bail Fund V. Gentry. Explore Case.
Tennessee
Sep 2021
Nashville Community Bail Fund v. Gentry

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Nashville Community Bail Fund v. Gentry

In Nashville, local officials keep money posted as bail to pay fines and fees. This happens even when the person whose bond was posted shows up to their required court dates. Under a local court rule and policies from the criminal clerk, pretrial release is conditioned on future payment, which leverages pretrial freedom to make money for the government.
Nashville Community Bail Fund V. Gentry. Explore Case.
Weber v Grand Rapids
Michigan
Feb 2020

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Hightower v. City of Grand Rapids

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ of Michigan and the ACLU's Criminal Law Reform Project filed a federal lawsuit in May of 2013, on behalf of Plaintiffs Gilbert Weber and Tyrone Hightower, challenging the Grand Rapids Police Department's longstanding practice of arresting innocent people for criminal trespass on commercial property without warning and without the business owner's knowledge. Even where those arrested are patronizing the business in question, police justify these illegal arrests by pointing to form letters signed by business owners months or years prior to the arrest agreeing to prosecute trespassers.
Explore case
Hightower V. City Of Grand Rapids. Explore Case.
Michigan
Feb 2020
Weber v Grand Rapids

Smart Justice

Criminal Law Reform

Hightower v. City of Grand Rapids

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ of Michigan and the ACLU's Criminal Law Reform Project filed a federal lawsuit in May of 2013, on behalf of Plaintiffs Gilbert Weber and Tyrone Hightower, challenging the Grand Rapids Police Department's longstanding practice of arresting innocent people for criminal trespass on commercial property without warning and without the business owner's knowledge. Even where those arrested are patronizing the business in question, police justify these illegal arrests by pointing to form letters signed by business owners months or years prior to the arrest agreeing to prosecute trespassers.
Hightower V. City Of Grand Rapids. Explore Case.
12
3
45...