Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

Featured

Court Case
Sep 2022
An illustration featuring a historic photo incarcerated people at Angola next to a modern image of incarcerated people at Angola. The outline of Louisiana is superimposed.

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

Alex A. v. Edwards

The 桃子视频National Prison Project and partner civil rights attorneys filed a federal class-action lawsuit to prevent the transfer of children in the custody of Louisiana's Office of Juvenile Justice to the Louisiana State Penitentiary, commonly known as Angola Prison.
Alex A. V. Edwards. Explore Case.
Texas
Jul 2021
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

Criminal Law Reform

Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al

Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The 桃子视频has been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
Sanchez Et Al V. Dallas County Sheriff Et Al. Explore Case.
Mississippi
Mar 2017
Dockery v. Hall

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

Prisoners' Rights

Dockery v. Hall

The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated in a perpetual state of crisis where prisoners are at grave risk of death and loss of limbs. The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
Dockery V. Hall. Explore Case.

All Cases

14 Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions Cases

Light streaming through a barred window casts a shadow of the bars the floor of a prison cell
Court Case
Jun 2015

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

C.B. et al. v. Walnut Grove Correctional Authority, et. al.

In June 2015, a federal court decided in favor of the 桃子视频position in Walnut Grove. With this federal court ruling, the Mississippi Department of Corrections will be held accountable to their Constitutional mandate to protect the prisoners of Walnut Grove from violence. A victory for prisoner's rights, this decision marks a major blow to the for-profit industrial complex. In April 2015, in federal court, the 桃子视频National Prison Project, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and McDuff & Byrd are all participating in a hearing that seeks to prove that the Mississippi Department of Corrections is violating the Eighth Amendment rights of all prisoners at Walnut Grove Correctional Facility to protection from violence. The department contracts with a for-profit prison operator, Management and Training Corporation (MTC), to run Walnut Grove. Over the years it has been proven that MTC has failed to implement fundamental security measures to ensure prisoner safety, which resulted in two major riots in 2014 that left 25 prisoners seriously injured. Three years ago, the Mississippi Department of Corrections agreed to take specific measures to reduce the violence at Walnut Grove when it settled a federal lawsuit brought by the 桃子视频National Prison Project and the Southern Poverty Law Center. The 2012 case decided that children under the supervision of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) would no longer be housed in a privately run prison or subjected to brutal solitary confinement. The lawsuit charged that conditions at the Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility, operated by GEO Group, Inc., were unconstitutional.
Explore case
C.b. Et Al. V. Walnut Grove Correctional Authority, Et. Al.. Explore Case.
Court Case
Jun 2015
Light streaming through a barred window casts a shadow of the bars the floor of a prison cell

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

C.B. et al. v. Walnut Grove Correctional Authority, et. al.

In June 2015, a federal court decided in favor of the 桃子视频position in Walnut Grove. With this federal court ruling, the Mississippi Department of Corrections will be held accountable to their Constitutional mandate to protect the prisoners of Walnut Grove from violence. A victory for prisoner's rights, this decision marks a major blow to the for-profit industrial complex. In April 2015, in federal court, the 桃子视频National Prison Project, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and McDuff & Byrd are all participating in a hearing that seeks to prove that the Mississippi Department of Corrections is violating the Eighth Amendment rights of all prisoners at Walnut Grove Correctional Facility to protection from violence. The department contracts with a for-profit prison operator, Management and Training Corporation (MTC), to run Walnut Grove. Over the years it has been proven that MTC has failed to implement fundamental security measures to ensure prisoner safety, which resulted in two major riots in 2014 that left 25 prisoners seriously injured. Three years ago, the Mississippi Department of Corrections agreed to take specific measures to reduce the violence at Walnut Grove when it settled a federal lawsuit brought by the 桃子视频National Prison Project and the Southern Poverty Law Center. The 2012 case decided that children under the supervision of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) would no longer be housed in a privately run prison or subjected to brutal solitary confinement. The lawsuit charged that conditions at the Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility, operated by GEO Group, Inc., were unconstitutional.
C.b. Et Al. V. Walnut Grove Correctional Authority, Et. Al.. Explore Case.
Kingsley v. Hendrickson
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2015

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

Kingsley v. Hendrickson

Whether the Constitution protects pretrial detainees against the unreasonable use of force regardless of the subjective motivation of the guards using that force.
Explore case
Kingsley V. Hendrickson. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2015
Kingsley v. Hendrickson

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

Kingsley v. Hendrickson

Whether the Constitution protects pretrial detainees against the unreasonable use of force regardless of the subjective motivation of the guards using that force.
Kingsley V. Hendrickson. Explore Case.
Mass Incarceration
Court Case
Dec 2010

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

+2 桃子视频

桃子视频comments to European Court of Human Rights in Babar Ahmad and Others v. The United Kingdom

Conditions of confinement in a US supermax prison
Explore case
Aclu Comments To European Court Of Human Rights In Babar Ahmad And Others V. The United Kingdom. Explore Case.
Court Case
Dec 2010
Mass Incarceration

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

+2 桃子视频

桃子视频comments to European Court of Human Rights in Babar Ahmad and Others v. The United Kingdom

Conditions of confinement in a US supermax prison
Aclu Comments To European Court Of Human Rights In Babar Ahmad And Others V. The United Kingdom. Explore Case.
Davis, et al. v. Canyon County, Idaho, et al.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2009

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

+3 桃子视频

Davis, et al. v. Canyon County, Idaho, et al.

Six plaintiffs file this action on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of all other persons incarcerated, now or in the future, in the Canyon County Jail in Caldwell, Idaho.
Explore case
Davis, Et Al. V. Canyon County, Idaho, Et Al.. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2009
Davis, et al. v. Canyon County, Idaho, et al.

Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions

+3 桃子视频

Davis, et al. v. Canyon County, Idaho, et al.

Six plaintiffs file this action on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of all other persons incarcerated, now or in the future, in the Canyon County Jail in Caldwell, Idaho.
Davis, Et Al. V. Canyon County, Idaho, Et Al.. Explore Case.
12
3