LGBTQ Rights

Featured

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2020
Aimee Stephens in front of the Supreme Court

LGBTQ Rights

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v EEOC & Aimee Stephens

Aimee Stephens had worked for nearly six years as a funeral director at R.G. and G.R. Harris Funeral Homes when she informed the funeral home’s owner that she is a transgender woman. She was fired, the EEOC sued on her behalf, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Aimee’s employer engaged in unlawful sex discrimination when it fired her because she’s transgender. We represented Aimee Stephens in front of the U.S. Supreme Court — and won.
R.g. & G.r. Harris Funeral Homes V Eeoc & Aimee Stephens. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2019
Don Zarda, Melissa Zarda, Bill Moore

LGBTQ Rights

Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda

Don Zarda loved to skydive. He worked as a skydiving instructor at Altitude Express, a company on Long Island, N.Y. He was fired for being gay.
Altitude Express Inc. V. Zarda. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018
David Mullins and Charlie Craig

LGBTQ Rights

Religious Liberty

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Masterpiece Cakeshop V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Jim Obergefell

LGBTQ Rights

Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Freedom to Marry in Ohio

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµof Ohio and Alphonse Gerhardstein of Gerhardstein & Branch have filed suit on behalf of Jim Obergefell and David Michener, two widowers, and Robert Grunn, a funeral director, in a challenge to the Ohio constitutional and statutory marriage recognition bans.
Obergefell, Et Al. V. Hodges - Freedom To Marry In Ohio. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2015
Bourke Family

LGBTQ Rights

Bourke v. Beshear & Love v. Beshear - Freedom to Marry in Kentucky

Bourke v. Beshear is a federal court challenge to Kentucky's constitutional ban on marriage for same-sex couples, filed by attorneys at Clay Daniel Walton & Adams and Fauver Law Office on July 26, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are four same-sex couples seeking state recognition of their out-of-state marriages.
Bourke V. Beshear & Love V. Beshear - Freedom To Marry In Kentucky. Explore Case.

All Cases

191 LGBTQ Rights Cases

Rumsfeld v. FAIR
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2005

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

Rumsfeld v. FAIR

Reviewing the constitutionality of the Solomon Amendment, which cuts off federal funding to any university that bars military recruiters for failure to comply with the university's nondiscrimination policies.
Explore case
Rumsfeld V. Fair. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2005
Rumsfeld v. FAIR

LGBTQ Rights

Free Speech

Rumsfeld v. FAIR

Reviewing the constitutionality of the Solomon Amendment, which cuts off federal funding to any university that bars military recruiters for failure to comply with the university's nondiscrimination policies.
Rumsfeld V. Fair. Explore Case.
Alaska CLU v. State of Alaska
Court Case
Oct 2005

LGBTQ Rights

Alaska CLU v. State of Alaska

Karen Wood and Terry Tavel are plaintiffs in the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµlawsuit to provide government employee benefits to partners of same-sex couples.
Explore case
Alaska Clu V. State Of Alaska. Explore Case.
Court Case
Oct 2005
Alaska CLU v. State of Alaska

LGBTQ Rights

Alaska CLU v. State of Alaska

Karen Wood and Terry Tavel are plaintiffs in the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµlawsuit to provide government employee benefits to partners of same-sex couples.
Alaska Clu V. State Of Alaska. Explore Case.
Limon v. Kansas
Court Case
Oct 2005

LGBTQ Rights

Limon v. Kansas

In February of 2000, Limon and another male teenager were both students at the same residential school for developmentally disabled youth in Miami County, Kansas. A week after Limon's 18th birthday, he performed consensual oral sex on the other teenager, who was nearly 15 years old - three years, one month and a few days younger. Because Kansas's so-called Romeo and Juliet law gives much lighter sentences to heterosexual teenagers who have sex with younger teens but specifically excludes gay teenagers, Limon was sentenced to 17 years in prison. A heterosexual teenager with the same record would serve no longer than 15 months for the same offense.
Explore case
Limon V. Kansas. Explore Case.
Court Case
Oct 2005
Limon v. Kansas

LGBTQ Rights

Limon v. Kansas

In February of 2000, Limon and another male teenager were both students at the same residential school for developmentally disabled youth in Miami County, Kansas. A week after Limon's 18th birthday, he performed consensual oral sex on the other teenager, who was nearly 15 years old - three years, one month and a few days younger. Because Kansas's so-called Romeo and Juliet law gives much lighter sentences to heterosexual teenagers who have sex with younger teens but specifically excludes gay teenagers, Limon was sentenced to 17 years in prison. A heterosexual teenager with the same record would serve no longer than 15 months for the same offense.
Limon V. Kansas. Explore Case.
GSA
Kentucky
Jul 2005

LGBTQ Rights

Boyd High GSA v. Boyd County Board of Education

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµsettled a lawsuit brought on behalf of several students who wanted to form a gay-straight alliance (GSA) club at Boyd County High School in Ashland, Kentucky. The settlement requires that the district treat all student clubs equally and conduct anti-harassment trainings for all students and staff. Several students had first petitioned the school to form the gay-straight alliance in March 2002. The school initially refused to approve the club, and then later took the extraordinary step of suspending all student clubs rather than recognize the GSA.
Explore case
Boyd High Gsa V. Boyd County Board Of Education. Explore Case.
Kentucky
Jul 2005
GSA

LGBTQ Rights

Boyd High GSA v. Boyd County Board of Education

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµsettled a lawsuit brought on behalf of several students who wanted to form a gay-straight alliance (GSA) club at Boyd County High School in Ashland, Kentucky. The settlement requires that the district treat all student clubs equally and conduct anti-harassment trainings for all students and staff. Several students had first petitioned the school to form the gay-straight alliance in March 2002. The school initially refused to approve the club, and then later took the extraordinary step of suspending all student clubs rather than recognize the GSA.
Boyd High Gsa V. Boyd County Board Of Education. Explore Case.
Hispanic AIDS Forum v. Bruno
New York
Mar 2005

LGBTQ Rights

HIV

Hispanic AIDS Forum v. Bruno

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµbrought the lawsuit on behalf of the Hispanic AIDS Forum (HAF) in 2001 after the agency was forced out of its home of 10 years in New York City because the landlord yielded to complaints from another tenant that the agency's transgender clients were using the wrong restrooms.
Explore case
Hispanic Aids Forum V. Bruno. Explore Case.
New York
Mar 2005
Hispanic AIDS Forum v. Bruno

LGBTQ Rights

HIV

Hispanic AIDS Forum v. Bruno

The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµbrought the lawsuit on behalf of the Hispanic AIDS Forum (HAF) in 2001 after the agency was forced out of its home of 10 years in New York City because the landlord yielded to complaints from another tenant that the agency's transgender clients were using the wrong restrooms.
Hispanic Aids Forum V. Bruno. Explore Case.
3637
38
39