Voting Rights

Featured

Mississippi
Dec 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

White v. Mississippi State Board of Elections

District lines used to elect Mississippi’s Supreme Court have gone unchanged for more than 35 years. We’re suing because the current lines crack the Mississippi Delta and dilute the voting strength of Black Mississippians in state Supreme Court elections, in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
White V. Mississippi State Board Of Elections. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2025
Alabama on a map of the United States of America

Voting Rights

Racial Justice

Allen v. Milligan

Whether Alabama’s congressional districts violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act because they discriminate against Black voters. We succeeded in winning a new map for 2024 elections which, for the first time, has two congressional district that provide Black voters a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choosing despite multiple attempts by Alabama to stop us at the Supreme Court. Despite this win, Alabama is still defending its discriminatory map, and a trial was held in February 2025 to determine the map for the rest of the decade. In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama's 2023 congressional map both violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted by the Alabama Legislature with racially discriminatory intent.
Allen V. Milligan. Explore Case.
Washington, D.C.
Oct 2025
trump

Voting Rights

League of Women Voters Education Fund v. Trump

On March 25, 2025, in a sweeping and unprecedented Executive Order, President Trump attempted to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress and the States. Among other things, the Executive Order directs the Election Assistance Commission—an agency that Congress specifically established to be bipartisan and independent—to require voters to show a passport or other citizenship documentation in order to register to vote in federal elections. If implemented, the Executive Order would threaten the ability of millions of eligible Americans to register and vote and upend the administration of federal elections. On behalf of leading voter registration organizations and advocacy organizations, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµand co-counsel filed a lawsuit to block the Executive Order as an unconstitutional power grab.
League Of Women Voters Education Fund V. Trump. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Mississippi

Voting Rights

State Board of Election Commissioners v. Mississippi State Conference of the NAACP

Mississippi has a growing Black population, which is already the largest Black population percentage of any state in the country. Yet. Black Mississippians continue to be significantly under-represented in the state legislature, as Mississippi’s latest districting maps fail to reflect the reality of the state’s changing demographics. During the 2022 redistricting process, the Mississippi legislature refused to create any new districts where Black voters have a chance to elect their preferred representative. The current district lines therefore dilute the voting power of Black Mississippians and continue to deprive them of political representation that is responsive to their needs and concerns, including severe disparities in education and healthcare.
State Board Of Election Commissioners V. Mississippi State Conference Of The Naacp. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2025
Louisiana

Voting Rights

Louisiana v. Callais (Callais v. Landry)

Whether the congressional map Louisiana adopted to cure a Voting Rights Act violation in Robinson v. Ardoin is itself unlawful as a gerrymander.
Louisiana V. Callais (callais V. Landry). Explore Case.
Missouri
Sep 2025
A close up of an "I Voted" sticker.

Voting Rights

Wise v. Missouri

In unprecedented fashion, the State of Missouri has redrawn the district lines used for electing members of Congress for a second time this decade. These new district lines are gerrymandered and will harm political representation for all Missourians, particularly Black residents in Kansas City, who have been divided along racial lines.
Wise V. Missouri. Explore Case.

All Cases

190 Voting Rights Cases

Young v. Hosemann
Mississippi
Sep 2008

Voting Rights

Racial Justice

Young v. Hosemann

Explore case
Young V. Hosemann. Explore Case.
Mississippi
Sep 2008
Young v. Hosemann

Voting Rights

Racial Justice

Young v. Hosemann

Young V. Hosemann. Explore Case.
Bartlett v. Strickland
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2008

Voting Rights

Bartlett v. Strickland

Whether minority voters who are deprived of the opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice when a state court rejects a legislative district where coalition building has been successful can assert a vote dilution claim under the Voting Rights Act, even if minority voters do not represent 50 percent of the population in the proposed district? DECIDED
Explore case
Bartlett V. Strickland. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2008
Bartlett v. Strickland

Voting Rights

Bartlett v. Strickland

Whether minority voters who are deprived of the opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice when a state court rejects a legislative district where coalition building has been successful can assert a vote dilution claim under the Voting Rights Act, even if minority voters do not represent 50 percent of the population in the proposed district? DECIDED
Bartlett V. Strickland. Explore Case.
Riley v. Kennedy
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2008

Voting Rights

Riley v. Kennedy

Whether voting changes that result from a state court decision need to be precleared under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. DECIDED
Explore case
Riley V. Kennedy. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2008
Riley v. Kennedy

Voting Rights

Riley v. Kennedy

Whether voting changes that result from a state court decision need to be precleared under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. DECIDED
Riley V. Kennedy. Explore Case.
New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2007

Voting Rights

New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres

Whether New York State's method for electing judges is unconstitutional because it deprives insurgent candidates and their supporters of a meaningful opportunity to participate in the electoral process. DECIDED
Explore case
New York State Board Of Elections V. Lopez Torres. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2007
New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres

Voting Rights

New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres

Whether New York State's method for electing judges is unconstitutional because it deprives insurgent candidates and their supporters of a meaningful opportunity to participate in the electoral process. DECIDED
New York State Board Of Elections V. Lopez Torres. Explore Case.
New Jersey Men and Women Prohibited from Voting Pursuant to State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies and Practices Petition the IACHR
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2006

Voting Rights

+3 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

New Jersey Men and Women Prohibited from Voting Pursuant to State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies and Practices Petition the IACHR

The felony disfranchisement laws, policies and practices of the United States violate the right to vote free from discrimination under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.
Explore case
New Jersey Men And Women Prohibited From Voting Pursuant To State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies And Practices Petition The Iachr. Explore Case.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2006
New Jersey Men and Women Prohibited from Voting Pursuant to State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies and Practices Petition the IACHR

Voting Rights

+3 ÌÒ×ÓÊÓÆµ

New Jersey Men and Women Prohibited from Voting Pursuant to State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies and Practices Petition the IACHR

The felony disfranchisement laws, policies and practices of the United States violate the right to vote free from discrimination under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man and the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights.
New Jersey Men And Women Prohibited From Voting Pursuant To State Disfranchisement Laws, Policies And Practices Petition The Iachr. Explore Case.
3536
37
38